Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 389
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 273
George Spelvin 260
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70672
biomed162316
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453216
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48375
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41213
CryptKicker37176
Mokoa36491
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2012, 08:44 PM   #1
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default Dr Susan Gratia-Hupp - Survivor of the 1991 Kileen TX Lubys Shooting

This is her testimony before Congress. It's a little over 5 minutes, but the sentence on here is priceless, as is her testimony.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sEYGcXSmpQ
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 02:37 AM   #2
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
This is her testimony before Congress. It's a little over 5 minutes, but the sentence on here is priceless, as is her testimony.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sEYGcXSmpQ
At the time, it was illegal to carry a loaded gun in your car. She was already in violation of the law.

She was right. It was stupid to carry a gun in her car but not keep it on her person.

She was as guilty as any party she mentioned. She chose to only violate the law a little bit.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 07:01 AM   #3
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
At the time, it was illegal to carry a loaded gun in your car.
In Texas in 1991?

Here's a commentary in 1981:
http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/R_Newman.html

It was considered a defense to prosecution if one was traveling and they had one in their vehicle. There is all kinds of different "Reader's Digest" explanations of "what is traveling" but there was no hard-in-fast rule, which was part of the problem. The legislature finally saw fit to give some guidance for consistency throughout the state ... and prevent the necessity of raising a defense after being arrested ...

but your flat statement has to be modified accodingly.

I also think you will not find "loaded" or "unloaded" in the Texas Penal Code ...

.. an "unloaded" firearm for the purposes of self-defense is a club.... and that's about all.... although if one points an unloaded weapon at another persion (who doesn't KNOW it is unloaded) it can be aggravated assault AND justify the use of deadly force against the person pointing the unloaded weapon .. at another.

If it even LOOKS like a firearm it is sufficient to justify deadly force in response to being confronted with it.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 07:18 AM   #4
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
At the time, it was illegal to carry a loaded gun in your car. She was already in violation of the law.

She was right. It was stupid to carry a gun in her car but not keep it on her person.

She was as guilty as any party she mentioned. She chose to only violate the law a little bit.
Didn't watch the video, did you, Münchausenman?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 07:33 AM   #5
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
She was as guilty as any party she mentioned. She chose to only violate the law a little bit.
This does not make much sense to me. As guilty as the shooter? As guilty as those that passed a bad law leaving her defenseless?
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 11:12 AM   #6
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz View Post
As guilty as those that passed a bad law leaving her defenseless?
Considering the general scope of things, it was not a "bad" law. She could have obtained a CHL and taken adequate traning afterwards to draw down on and elimiate the threat when she saw it ... she chose not to do so.... oh wait ... I guess she couldn't get one!

So, she is brought up why?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 12:33 PM   #7
Laz
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
Considering the general scope of things, it was not a "bad" law. She could have obtained a CHL and taken adequate traning afterwards to draw down on and elimiate the threat when she saw it ... she chose not to do so.... oh wait ... I guess she couldn't get one!

So, she is brought up why?
I don't think the CHL law was in existence at that time.
Laz is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:53 PM   #8
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz View Post
I don't think the CHL law was in existence at that time.
I think you are correct ....

Originally Posted by LexusLover
Quote:
Considering the general scope of things, it was not a "bad" law. She could have obtained a CHL and taken adequate training afterwards to draw down on and elimiate the threat when she saw it ... she chose not to do so.... oh wait ... I guess she couldn't get one!
Quote:

So, she is brought up why?"
I regret her losses, and I regret her failure to have her handgun in her purse. But that is not to say that the result would have been any different. And I'm not "anti-carry" by any stretch of the imagination.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 06:58 PM   #9
mansfield
Valued Poster
 
mansfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 19, 2010
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 773
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
But that is not to say that the result would have been any different.
But it MIGHT have been, and that fighting chance is one that all law abiding citizens deserve.
mansfield is offline   Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 09:08 PM   #10
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

There's a saying in other fields: You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 05:26 AM   #11
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mansfield View Post
But it MIGHT have been, and that fighting chance is one that all law abiding citizens deserve.
If I had been born with wings, it would save me some airline fare, but there would be others out there with wings, and the airspace would be treacherous and "unforgiving."

(The toll roads are "treacherous" enough with idiots driving ... well ... like idiots.)

All citizens deserve a fighting chance ... she made a decision ... and had she had CHL at the time ... it is just as likely that Lubby's would put up a sign advising ALL CITIZENS, consistent with the authority of the CHL rules and regulations, to LEAVE THEIR HANDGUNS OUTSIDE!

FYI: Have you seen those signs before?

Or are you one of those CHL carriers who are ....

..... NOT LAW ABIDING?

LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 05:32 AM   #12
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidewinder View Post
There's a saying in other fields: You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.
There's a reality in shooting:

What's your percentage of hits when under fire?

Where do your misses go?
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 07:54 AM   #13
mansfield
Valued Poster
 
mansfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 19, 2010
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 773
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
it is just as likely that Lubby's would put up a sign advising ALL CITIZENS, consistent with the authority of the CHL rules and regulations, to LEAVE THEIR HANDGUNS OUTSIDE!
Actually it's not very likely at all. Lubys still doesn't post those signs, nor do most places. They are actually pretty rare in Texas. You see them a lot at corporate type office buildings but pretty rarely at restaurants, retail stores, etc.

I have carried pretty much 100% of the time since the CHL was put in place in Texas and I just dont' run into those signs as I go about my business and, if I do run into a sign on occasion, I don't use that business anymore.

But the truth is the sign is pretty rare here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LL
What's your percentage of hits when under fire?
The average person with training will hit about 1 out of 4 in a gunfight. The misses do go somewhere, which is what the training is for. You don't shoot at a guy standing in front of 20 people.

There are no guarantees in this world. If you can't take a shot without endangering innocents then you don't take the shot. There is no rule that says a concealed carrier HAS to fire. In fact if you look nationwide you will see that concealed carriers hit bystanders less often than cops in shootouts because cops tend to feel like they HAVE to shoot. Having the option, as a law abiding citizen, to defend ourselves with a firearm, hasn't caused harm to the general population in any of the states with concealed carry laws so your fretting about "what if" is bullshit, the concealed carry programs have been around long enough that if they caused the blood of the innocents to flow in the streets we would have seen it by now. It simply didn't happen.

But the reality is that it's often just the presence of a firearm that is enough for defensive use. I have drawn my carry gun twice and did not have to fire either time. The second time in particular I know for a fact that the 2 guys approaching me were going to kill me, they told the cops as much. But when they saw I was not easy prey they changed their minds and were arrested a few minutes later running like hell. One had a gun and one had a knife.

Why didn't the want to fight? Because they expected to see an unarmed victim. Bad guys don't WANT to get in gunfights. they go into situations expecting they will be the only ones with guns. All people like you want to do is make sure they are able to do that, since the criminals will ignore all your pretty gun laws anyway.

That's sort of the textbook definition of "criminal".
mansfield is offline   Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 09:38 AM   #14
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mansfield View Post
Actually it's not very likely at all.

But the truth is the sign is pretty rare here.



The average person with training will hit about 1 out of 4 in a gunfight. The misses do go somewhere, which is what the training is for. You don't shoot at a guy standing in front of 20 people.


That's sort of the textbook definition of "criminal".
Yes, that's why they wear body armour is because they don't expect anyone to carry a firearm when they enter. The rest of your post is speculation, just like mine.

As for your "average person" estimate, 25% is poor, failing, and an excellent statistic to prohibit the carrying of firearms by trained, "average people." But I appreciate your support for my years of posting that CHL training is inadequate for carry purposes.

As for life ... and things going wrong ... it is by definition murder to shoot at someone, miss that person, and hit another innocent person who dies from that hit. So in a Lubby's restaurant, a school, or a move theater, based on your analysis there is a 75% chance of a round striking another innocent person by the "average person" and that does not factor in pass throughs.

We are talking shoot outs in high occupancy facilities.
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 09:49 AM   #15
Yssup Rider
BANNED
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,189
Encounters: 67
Default

Why are we talking about this?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved