Odumbo lies again!

[I B Hankering]

Today, at a White House briefing, Odumbo double-downed on his debate lie wherein he falsely claimed he'd deemed the Benghazi attack an act of terror the day after the attack. Despite CBS documentation to the contrary, Odumbo made that same false statement again today: he lied again.

[Seedy]

Every time he opens his mouth, he either lies, or is sucking cock.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Today, at a White House briefing, Odumbo double-downed on his debate lie wherein he falsely claimed he'd deemed the Benghazi attack an act of terror the day after the attack. Despite CBS documentation to the contrary, Odumbo made that same false statement again today: he lied again.

despite the words "act of terror" directly out of his mouth at the 1;00 minute mark on the tape from the speech he gave the day after,, youre an idiot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ILstYEZfus

[i'va biggen]

Ida Bell posts more shit and seedy wants a dick to suck. Typical wingers.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Ida Bell posts more shit and seedy wants a dick to suck. Typical wingers.

none of these fuckrs know wtf theyre talking about, but they expect people to believe them

fukem

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

despite the words "act of terror" directly out of his mouth at the 1;00 minute mark on the tape from the speech he gave the day after,, youre an idiot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ILstYEZfus

This is what CBS finally reported, CBJ7:

October 17, 2012.

"Let's look at the transcript of those September 12 comments in the Rose Garden, as the president suggested.

"It shows that the president did refer to "acts of terror" - but not specifically in reference to the Libya attack. . . .

"You can make the case that the president was referring to the Libya attacks as well as other "acts of terror," since he made the comment in the course of a statement about those attacks. But the stronger case would seem to be that the president did not specifically refer to the attack as an act of terror - as Romney said."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...terrorist-act/

Later, CBS released a tape dated 12 September 2012 that clearly showed Odumbo denying Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

CBS under fire for withholding Obama's Benghazi remarks

November 5, 2012.

"CBS News is continuing to draw fire for withholding footage of a Sept. 12 interview with President Barack Odumbo in which he said it was "too early to tell" whether or not the previous day's attack in Benghazi, Libya, had been an act of terror.

"That remark, which was not included in the "60 Minutes" package that first aired on Sept. 23, was also left out of a subsequent package that aired in the days following the second presidential debate, when President Obama said that he had called the attack "an act of terror" in his Rose Garden address on Sept. 12, which took place before the interview."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...ks-148513.html


BTW CBJ7, does Odumbo pay you as much as he pays Carney to lie?

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This is what CBS finally reported, CBJ7:

October 17, 2012.

"Let's look at the transcript of those September 12 comments in the Rose Garden, as the president suggested.

"It shows that the president did refer to "acts of terror" - but not specifically in reference to the Libya attack. . . .

"You can make the case that the president was referring to the Libya attacks as well as other "acts of terror," since he made the comment in the course of a statement about those attacks. But the stronger case would seem to be that the president did not specifically refer to the attack as an act of terror - as Romney said."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...terrorist-act/

Later, CBS released a tape dated 12 September 2012 that clearly showed Odumbo denying Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

CBS under fire for withholding Obama's Benghazi remarks

November 5, 2012.

"CBS News is continuing to draw fire for withholding footage of a Sept. 12 interview with President Barack Odumbo in which he said it was "too early to tell" whether or not the previous day's attack in Benghazi, Libya, had been an act of terror.

"That remark, which was not included in the "60 Minutes" package that first aired on Sept. 23, was also left out of a subsequent package that aired in the days following the second presidential debate, when President Obama said that he had called the attack "an act of terror" in his Rose Garden address on Sept. 12, which took place before the interview."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...ks-148513.html


BTW CBJ7, does Odumbo pay you as much as he pays Carney to lie?

watch the tape, pay close attention at 1;00, THEN STFU

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

watch the tape, pay close attention at 1;00, THEN STFU

Watch the video, pay close attention to where Odumbo says "too early to tell," then STFU.


http://michellemalkin.com/2012/11/05/cbs-video/

http://www.isthatbaloney.com/obama-w...rview-segment/

[CJ7]

at 100 he proves youre an idiot

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

at 100 he proves youre an idiot

The professional reporter's opinion is:

At 1:00 "the stronger case would seem to be that the president did not specifically refer to the attack as an act of terror - as Romney said."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...terrorist-act/

[CJ7]

congrats, once again you have just reached the level of stupidity that surpasses my patience. Rather than have a conversation with me in the future go find a wall.

The E-N-D.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

congrats, once again you have just reached the level of stupidity that surpasses my patience. Rather than have a conversation with me in the future go find a wall.

The E-N-D.

It's not patience you are exercising, CBJ, it's obstinate ignorance. These are the facts:

A professional -- libertard -- reporter's opinion on what Odumbo said in the Rose Garden, on 12 September 2012, is:

At the 1:00 mark "the stronger case would seem to be that the president did not specifically refer to the attack as an act of terror - as Romney said."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-...terrorist-act/

Later that same day, 12 September 2012, CBS interviewed Odumbo, and Odumbo refused to refer to the Benghazi attack as an act of terrorism. Still a fact!!!! Here's the interview:

KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word terrorism in connection with the Libya Attack, do you believe that this was a terrorism attack?

OBAMA: Well it’s too early to tell exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans. And we are going to be working with the Libyan government to make sure that we bring these folks to justice, one way or the other.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...or_attack.html


Fact!!! Every time Odumbo has since stated that he did call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism on 12 September has been a lie, and Odumbo lied again today. Fact!!!

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by CJ7

congrats, once again you have just reached the level of stupidity that surpasses my patience. Rather than have a conversation with me in the future go find a wall.

The E-N-D.

A conversation with Ida Bell is like being on a merry-go-round....

[JD Barleycorn]

So if a cop was talking about "acts of rape" you would automatically assume that he was talking about your gay rapist?

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So if a cop was talking about "acts of rape" you would automatically assume that he was talking about your gay rapist?

And she finds a way to sneak "gay rapist" into this thread too.

So does this rapist rape gays?

Is the rapist gay?

Is he a happy rapist?

Or is he just your kind of rapist?