Spin this with your number of people who have dropped out!

[Little Stevie]

23 STRAIGHT months of job GROWTH according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics

[Little Stevie]

in the PRIVATE SECTOR!

Hey, Obama haters, this doesn't sound like the definition of Socialism to me!

[1NEMESIS]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

in the PRIVATE SECTOR!

Hey, Obama haters, this doesn't sound like the definition of Socialism to me!

HELL YEAH! OBAMA/BIDEN 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Little Stevie]

Duplicate post deleted

[Little Stevie]

Just wait, Nemesis.

The low intelligence posters will soon be here to defecate on this irrefutable chart with more of their hate speak and misinformation.

[waverunner234]

Hey Stevie, I have dropped out. Not because I can't find a job, just because I don't want a job.
But I'm still counted because I still get my extended unemployment check from Texas. ($415 every week)
(That's the only good thing Texas has ever done for me)

[Little Stevie]

Originally Posted by waverunner234

Hey Stevie, I have dropped out. Not because I can't find a job, just because I don't want a job.
But I'm still counted because I still get my extended unemployment check from Texas. ($415 every week)
(That's the only good thing Texas has ever done for me)

Then you are still being counted as unemployed if you are receiving unemployment benefits.

Come on, Somebody SPIN the Bureau of Labor Statistics chart showing 23 STRAIGHT MONTHS of POSITIVE PRIVATE SECTOR JOB CREATION figures under the hated Barack Obama.

Gee, I guess he just couldn't figure out a way to force job losses in the private sector even with the Teapublicans helping slow down the economy by obstructing every jobs bill introduced!

[waverunner234]

That's right, I'm VERY unemployed. And I am counted in the UE Statistics.
In the meantime, my currency business is thriving.
But hey, they don't ask the right questions on that form I have to fill out every 2 weeks.
So there is no way I can put my profits in there. Fortunately.

Hey man, LIFE IS GREAT

And having sex in between!

[CuteOldGuy]

It's a campaign spin, but the growth still looks pretty anemic. But I will admit that it is better than jobs decreasing. That's not enough to get me to support Obama, but I'm glad the trend appears to be that way. I still think unemployment is being underreported, but that is a tradition in Washington that has gone on for a number of administrations.

Get the President to repeal Section 1030 of the NDAA of 2011, and then we'll talk support.

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

Just wait, Nemesis.

The low intelligence posters will soon be here to defecate on this irrefutable chart with more of their hate speak and misinformation.

You beat us all to it little stevie.

[CuteOldGuy]

Hold on, I thought this information was irrefutable. I guess no one told these guys, and they make more sense.

http://www.reagancoalition.com/artic...t-numbers.html

I already know you are going to make fun of the source, so let's just stipulate to that. Respond with facts, please.

[Little Stevie]

No one ever says anything about baby boomers retiring or the labor pool's shrinkage from other reasons. They always want to slam Obama. Neither does the right address job numbers growth without examining their own methodology in arriving at the size of the labor pool. They also dismiss the fact that stimulus money saved U.S. jobs that led to growth in both support industries and jobs associated with that growth here in the U.S.

The BLS is non-partisan no matter what your righty site says.

I see the economy improving even here in Texas where so much rides on the price of oil.

Services that report new construction and large remodel projects like the Dodge Reports are listing more activity here in Texas now than was happening 6 months ago. In other words, businesses are building brick and mortar establishments at a greater rate than they were six months ago.

[Texas Contrarian]

Did we really need another thread attempting to put some sort of happy spin on Obama's economic "recovery" plan? There's already one that was started by Fast Gunn Friday.

Do you guys realize that this has been the lamest economic recovery in modern U.S. history? Even more to the point, do you Kool-Aid imbibers have any idea why? Judging from some of the stuff you clowns post, I doubt it.

But as long as you're challenging people to spin things, Little Stevie, why don't you try spinning this?

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=2138400&postcount=59

Since you insinuated that those who disagree with you are "low-intelligence" posters, surely you will not have any trouble summarily destroying my simple, to-the-point arguments.

Come on Little Stevie, show us some brilliance. Fill this forum with your intelligence!

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Little Stevie

No one ever says anything about baby boomers retiring or the labor pool's shrinkage from other reasons. They always want to slam Obama. Neither does the right address job numbers growth without examining their own methodology in arriving at the size of the labor pool. They also dismiss the fact that stimulus money saved U.S. jobs that led to growth in both support industries and jobs associated with that growth here in the U.S.

The BLS is non-partisan no matter what your righty site says.

I see the economy improving even here in Texas where so much rides on the price of oil.

Services that report new construction and large remodel projects like the Dodge Reports are listing more activity here in Texas now than was happening 6 months ago. In other words, businesses are building brick and mortar establishments at a greater rate than they were six months ago.

Things are going well in Texas? Hmmm . . . maybe Governor Perry is doing a good job!

[Little Stevie]

Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight

Do you guys realize that this has been the lamest economic recovery in modern U.S. history?

It may be the lamest but those policies also stopped the threat of the largest global depression since the 1929 crash (or WORSE).

But as long as you're challenging people to spin things, Little Stevie, why don't you try spinning this?

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=2138400&postcount=59

I don't categorically disagree with the fundamental theory of too much government spending although I think it is horribly misapplied without major budget changes. It also forgets that revenue could also be added to pay for spending if we weren't controlled by interests who are still trying to sell a fundamentally crippled theory of supply-side economics.

The answer does NOT lie in continuing the Status Quo with huge Super PACS and a K Street army that has bought 90% of all politicians.

Since you insinuated that those who disagree with you are "low-intelligence" posters, surely you will not have any trouble taking apart my simple, to-the-point arguments.

This country has worked from day one with a BLENDED capitalistic and socialistic economy and governance. It is only when those things get out of balance that we have problems. Not since the 1890's have we had this much corporate/industry/financial control of legislation, regulation, taxation and wealth.

Capitalism cannot succeed without a social conscience and and neither could Socialism succeed without a its own components of capitalistic concepts.

Failure of those who are unwilling to protect the infrastructure rather than dismember it for short term profits will eventually plunge this nation into chaos and collapse.