Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
Starscream66 |
280 |
George Spelvin |
267 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70797 | biomed1 | 63351 | Yssup Rider | 61063 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48697 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42854 | CryptKicker | 37223 | The_Waco_Kid | 37195 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
01-18-2013, 09:31 AM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 843
|
Yep, O'Blunder Cares About Jobs...riiiigghht.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/01/obama-jobs-council-hits-year-without-official-meeting-154524.html
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 11:18 AM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
|
He's a warrior!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 12:42 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.
His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."
Hes a fuckstick!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 01:01 PM
|
#4
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.
His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."
Hes a fuckstick!
|
Not a fan of Boehner, he's a spineless RINO. But regardless, having a budget and getting the Federal fiscal house in order is a large part of economic recovery and creating jobs. The House has passed a budget every year of O'Blunders term. Not one of them has even been voted on by the Senate, run by Dirty Harry, possibly the only person in D.C. more economically illiterate than O'Blunder. The only budgets voted on in the Senate have been O'Blunders, all of which went down in bipartisan flames.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 01:19 PM
|
#5
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
Not a fan of Boehner, he's a spineless RINO. But regardless, having a budget and getting the Federal fiscal house in order is a large part of economic recovery and creating jobs. The House has passed a budget every year of O'Blunders term. Not one of them has even been voted on by the Senate, run by Dirty Harry, possibly the only person in D.C. more economically illiterate than O'Blunder. The only budgets voted on in the Senate have been O'Blunders, all of which went down in bipartisan flames.
|
apparently, youre too stupid to understand why the senate refuses to vote on house budgets
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 01:26 PM
|
#6
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
apparently, youre too stupid to understand why the senate refuses to vote on house budgets
|
OK, you explain it to me. House budgets pass easily, Senate doesn't even have an up-or-down vote on it for show. Yet, O'Blunders proposals get ZERO votes from anyone in either chamber for three years running. Enlighten me, what am I missing??
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 01:59 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
OK, you explain it to me. House budgets pass easily, Senate doesn't even have an up-or-down vote on it for show. Yet, O'Blunders proposals get ZERO votes from anyone in either chamber for three years running. Enlighten me, what am I missing??
|
uhhh, try the fact the house budget contained i.e. making the tax cuts permanent, and deep cuts in social programs, basically EVERYTHING that was on the republican agenda, and EVERYTHING the dem senate opposed..
if a senate budget was or had been handed to the house that contained EVERYTHING the dems wanted and NOTHING the republicans wanted, do you honestly believe the house would sign off on said budget and let the dems have their way?
I dont think so ..
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:26 PM
|
#8
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 843
|
Lower taxes and cuts in government deficit spending...oh my!! The Senate doesn't initiate the budget, the House does. The Senate is supposed to take what the House passes, mark it up, negotiate, etc., then send it back. Not shove it under Dirty Harry's desk like it never happened. Damn, CBJ, you're really showing your ignorance. I almost feel bad for ya. This is Civics 101, you should really educate yourself.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:31 PM
|
#9
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
Lower taxes and cuts in government deficit spending...oh my!! The Senate doesn't initiate the budget, the House does. The Senate is supposed to take what the House passes, mark it up, negotiate, etc., then send it back. Not shove it under Dirty Harry's desk like it never happened. Damn, CBJ, you're really showing your ignorance. I almost feel bad for ya. This is Civics 101, you should really educate yourself.
|
exactly ! up to the dirty harry point...
congress as a whole plays political football with a budget, and at the end of the day the house yammers how the senate refused to pass a budget knowing full well the republican base is stupid enough to lay it off in the dem senate .. welcome to stupid ET
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:42 PM
|
#10
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 843
|
Damn, CBJ, you should just stop digging. You're in way over your head. How can a budget pass through both Houses, or not, if it's never put forward for a vote in one of those Houses??
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:48 PM
|
#11
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
Damn, CBJ, you should just stop digging. You're in way over your head. How can a budget pass through both Houses, or not, if it's never put forward for a vote in one of those Houses??
|
the Ryan budget is a perfect example ... you thing the dems would vote on that budget as is, amend it, or as a majority ignore it?
put the budget shoe on the other foot (dem majority house) (republican majority senate) and tell me the senate if wouldnt do the same damn thing ..
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:55 PM
|
#12
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
tyell ya what ET ... since youre the board budget expert, you explain to the board exactly why the 109th congress failed to pass a budget ... BTW, the republicans had a majority in BOTH houses
you have the floor sir
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 02:56 PM
|
#13
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 6, 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,939
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
the Ryan budget is a perfect example ... you thing the dems would vote on that budget as is, amend it, or as a majority ignore it?
put the budget shoe on the other foot (dem majority house) (republican majority senate) and tell me the senate if wouldnt do the same damn thing ..
|
We have had a dem majority house and a republican majority senate before and funny I don't recall this ever happening. Keep digging CBJ7.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 03:46 PM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
We have had a dem majority house and a republican majority senate before and funny I don't recall this ever happening. Keep digging CBJ7.
|
how about you laughing boy, in your infinite wisdom (snick) please tell everyone why a republican majority house and senate failed to pass a budget ..
It happened with the budgets for fiscal years 1999, 2003, 2005 and 2007. And remember that the budget for any given fiscal year is something dealt with during the prior calendar year. That means the fiscal year 2007 budget was dealt with in the Republican 109th Congress.
source: the Congressional Research Service (PDF).
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
01-18-2013, 04:12 PM
|
#15
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Ahead of you.
Posts: 856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.
His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."
Hes a fuckstick!
|
" The House has approved more than 15 bills that, if enacted, would immediately help to grow the economy without more failed stimulus spending."
http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/11/10...-bills-stalled
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|