If I get arrested....

[Cynamon]

Maybe Shyster or some other lawyers can correct me if I'm wrong.

But, If I ever get in trouble...I'm going to take it to the supreme court and argue under Lawrence v. Texas its unconstitutional to prohibit consensual adult private conduct.

I think I would win.

[bradjbeale]

Not to burst your bubble, but if you tried that you'd be sitting in the pokie for a while.

First, Lawrence v. Texas specifically says its holding does not apply to prostitution, and it is an equal protection/substantive due process case anyway. We all know the issue with hobbying isn't the "consensual adult private conduct", it's the paying for it. That's a Commerce Clause issue, and each and every Commerce Clause case you read will say basically the same thing: the Legislative branch can regulate just about any market they damn well please, even the pussy market. But feel free to do some more researching on that if you'd like (and take a gander at the Mann Act, too)....I'm always up for some interesting legal arguments/discussions

[Cynamon]

Originally Posted by bradjbeale

Not to burst your bubble, but if you tried that you'd be sitting in the pokie for a while.

First, Lawrence v. Texas specifically says its holding does not apply to prostitution, and it is an equal protection/substantive due process case anyway. We all know the issue with hobbying isn't the "consensual adult private conduct", it's the paying for it. That's a Commerce Clause issue, and each and every Commerce Clause case you read will say basically the same thing: the Legislative branch can regulate just about any market they damn well please, even the pussy market. But feel free to do some more researching on that if you'd like (and take a gander at the Mann Act, too)....I'm always up for some interesting legal arguments/discussions

Yes sir. But I would pave the way for my fellow sex workers. I'm aware that it would be a long process. I'm a escort. So, I don't understand half of what you just said. But, I'm trying. I did post this to get a response from educated men, such as yourself to gather more information. I believe the Lawrence V. Texas case still represents a good argument. When I read of it I got happy inside.

Say, it did turn out to be relevant. I was vindicated by the Supreme Court. I wonder if I could sue the state that wrongfully imprisoned me?

I don't think I could. The law was not settled.

I guess I won't walk in to a sting operation just yet.

[Cynamon]

Originally Posted by bradjbeale

Not to burst your bubble, but if you tried that you'd be sitting in the pokie for a while.

First, Lawrence v. Texas specifically says its holding does not apply to prostitution, and it is an equal protection/substantive due process case anyway. We all know the issue with hobbying isn't the "consensual adult private conduct", it's the paying for it. That's a Commerce Clause issue, and each and every Commerce Clause case you read will say basically the same thing: the Legislative branch can regulate just about any market they damn well please, even the pussy market. But feel free to do some more researching on that if you'd like (and take a gander at the Mann Act, too)....I'm always up for some interesting legal arguments/discussions

I'm looking up the Mann Act now.

[sweet.treat69]

How many look at me threads are you going to make?? What's your quota exactly?

[AmericanIdiot]

Originally Posted by Cynamon

Say, it did turn out to be relevant. I was vindicated by the Supreme Court. I wonder if I could sue the state that wrongfully imprisoned me?

I don't think I could. The law was not settled.

I guess I won't walk in to a sting operation just yet.

While I don't know the whole story behind the Dallas PD shooting spree yesterday, the father of the guy said it best, "we have a legal system, not a justice system".

While going up against city hall is admirable just keep in mind that the likelihood of being a martyr is pretty high and that subsequent martyrs of a greater magnitude are going to be required to move a corrupt system.

[Cynamon]

Sweet.treat69,

Do you have anything to offer about the Lawrence Vs. Texas case or have you taken this opportunity to make yourself look like a bitch. For the 1000th time.

Go take your meds before you start calling/texting random clients begging to be their ATF. I don't feel like reading any bullshit apology thread about how you've changed your life tomorrow.

I don't give 2 fucks about what you do for marketing or entertainment. I'm here to book clients and fuck them. I have no fucking idea what you post. Stay in your lane.

More marketing/educational posts to come.

[Cynamon]

[QUOTE=AmericanIdiot;1056834040]While I don't know the whole story behind the Dallas PD shooting spree yesterday, the father of the guy said it best, "we have a legal system, not a justice system".

While going up against city hall is admirable just keep in mind that the likelihood of being a martyr is pretty high and that subsequent martyrs of a greater magnitude are going to be required to move a corrupt system.[/QUOTE

Yes. I understand that. Surely, this will never happen. I really wanted to gain a little knowledge about whether or not the lawyers here thought this could fly at some point. I'm guessing most people don't want to sit in Prison to make a point. I was wondering if that is why this case has not ever been brought up to argue a prostitution case. I could be wrong in assuming its relevancy. But, it seemed appropriate.

[Prolongus]

[/QUOTEYes. I understand that. Surely, this will never happen. I really wanted to gain a little knowledge about whether or not the lawyers here thought this could fly at some point. I'm guessing most people don't want to sit in Prison to make a point. I was wondering if that is why this case has not ever been brought up to argue a prostitution case. I could be wrong in assuming its relevancy. But, it seemed appropriate.[/QUOTE]

There has to be some form of "evidence" otherwise how would they convict you? Maybe a lawyer could say all LE needed was "probable cause". Anybody here have any experience in getting "busted" and how the cops proved their case?

As stupid as some of the laws are, surely a smart lawyer could figure this out and defend you.

[pyramider]

A Supreme Court case out of a misdemeanor? Are you aware of how much it costs for a case just to reach the Supremes? You would be better off spending your time posting taint photos.

[Hercules]

I think your real problem would be expense. Getting something to the Supreme Court takes a LOT of money. Or even finding a legal team willing to do it for bragging rights would still incur a lot of fees.

[Cynamon]

Originally Posted by Hercules

I think your real problem would be expense. Getting something to the Supreme Court takes a LOT of money. Or even finding a legal team willing to do it for bragging rights would still incur a lot of fees.

To most people. I have a lawyer in my family. Very near and dear. She would have interest in this. She is the one who referred me to the case and proposed the defense.

[Cynamon]

Originally Posted by pyramider

A Supreme Court case out of a misdemeanor? Are you aware of how much it costs for a case just to reach the Supremes? You would be better off spending your time posting taint photos.

In oklahoma the "computer use" part has become a felony. I believe.

[pyramider]

But you are in TX.

[Cynamon]

Originally Posted by pyramider

But you are in TX.

I live also work In oklahoma. I also work in texas.