Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Before you click on the link mentioned, this will tell you all you need to know:
rumble.com
Rumble.com is an online video platform. The cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users
Rumble is for sure not somewhere I would expect to hear any Liberal perspectives but it was an interesting watch.
Point #1 - Trump was winning.... before he was losing. All those 'anomalies' mentioned because of course if Biden is gaining votes that must be tinkering. Same old bullshit.
The video from State Farm Arena that supposedly shows ballots 'hidden under tables' has been debunked. Anyone caring enough to fact check that can easily see the longer clip.
Then we cut to someone arrested in Texas for voter fraud which there is some evidence supporting the claim but last I heard the Texas AG office had been disqualified from prosecution and the case was set for dismissal. All 38 electors from Texas went to Trump.
Then the video makes a case that the encryption levels of voter machines may have allowed something to happen. Possibly.
It is a big nothing burger with extra sauce and very little meat.
Before you click on the link mentioned, this will tell you all you need to know:
rumble.com
Rumble.com is an online video platform. The cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users
Rumble didn't produce the video they only featured it on their platform. So it doesn't matter what Rumble's political leanings are. Youtube wouldn't feature it because it is Liberal orientated.
Maybe that's why I can't verify the OP claim by fact checking.
Seems to be a few people here with some knowledge go ahead and
link some supporting commentary? Would be cool to take a deeper
dive into this error rate issue.
Before you click on the link mentioned, this will tell you all you need to know:
rumble.com
Rumble.com is an online video platform. The cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users
That an information source is "popular" with a constituency on either end of the political spectrum does not in and =of itself impugn the verity of any specific story.
If the report of something is accurate but distasteful to Socialists, that story and probably its source will also be "unpopular" to them. The converse is also true, regardless of one's political views.
I enjoy looking at a variety of media outlets. It is the viewer's choice to filter and assess any bias as well as fact check the information. We will all find our own truth on some level but often I see people just accepting what is reported or searching for information to support a conclusion.
When the claims of voter interference surfaced I wanted Justice. Biden is someone I could not vote for and felt was an awful choice by Dems but Trump did drive away many moderates and didn't work seeking re-election in ways he did the first run to bring in voters who might not normally lean Republican. I do not denounce the claims of stolen election due to political preference its about evidence. What I do find unproductive and often dangerous is the continued effort to cling to those claims and let it dictate how people want to move forward. We have to let go at some point and play the game in front of us.
If we let Biden or someone from his circle sit in the Oval Office another 4 years because our energy was spent on what did or didn't happen in 2020 what have we done?
That an information source is "popular" with a constituency on either end of the political spectrum does not in and =of itself impugn the verity of any specific story.
If the report of something is accurate but distasteful to Socialists, that story and probably its source will also be "unpopular" to them. The converse is also true, regardless of one's political views.
You have got to be kidding me.
These biased, alternate sites, of all political leanings, would never run a story that does not support their biased view.....and likely not a neutral story. You already know what you are going to get before reading it. And unfortunately, many sites run stories with unsupported "facts", and outright lies.
Ear wax build up, maybe. Or is it something else??
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaMan
Before you click on the link mentioned, this will tell you all you need to know:
rumble.com
Rumble.com is an online video platform. The cloud services business hosts Truth Social, and the video platform is popular among American right and far-right users
So you're saying it is not controlled by your team and must therefore be wrong. 'Cause that's what I heard you say.
Let me try my gooder ear: So you're saying since you cannot censor or control it - it is the Devil.
Wtf dudes. It's a well known fact that the election was rigged. It's also a really really well known "proven" fact that the moron megas cant do shit about it except getting indicted again and again and...
Fucked up gop can only focus on hunter and barbi and showing the world how putin fucked up the gop. Now that's some serious shit...billion dollar barbi
Believe in point, more like and totally beside the point. One can always discuss with fact, point and counter point - but as soon as you claim it's false solely because you do not subscribe to the source then you are censoring. Well.. you are being told to censor - which is worse.
Example on a totally different topic, though it includes Rumble as the source platform. Point is not to watch it or even comment on the topic presented. The point is to see the censorship only.
The video is wrong. The 68% voting machine error rate was debunked long ago. Trump quoted a report with multiple errors in his tweet that claimed the 68% rate.
The fact check is a long one so I'm not going to put it all in here. The link will take you to the fact check that clearly explains why the numbers are wrong.
"In a Dec. 15 tweet, Trump claimed there was a "68% error rate in Michigan Voting Machines. Should be, by law, a tiny percentage of one percent."
"Trump was reacting to a consultant’s report that a judge made public Monday in connection with an election lawsuit in Antrim County, in northern Michigan, where a misapplied software update initially led to incorrect unofficial results being reported on election night. But Trump’s tweet misinterprets the findings of the report, which itself presents a misleading picture."
"State and county officials say the reporting error, which was corrected soon after the election, was the result of human error by County Clerk Sheryl Guy, a Republican, before the election."
Very little evidence I guess....
