80 Million. Trump the Sexusl Assaulter

[1blackman1]

$80,000,000 is a lot of money, even for a billionaire. He'd have come out better by just admitting he did it.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

$80,000,000 is a lot of money, even for a billionaire. He'd have come out better by just admitting he did it.

Do you believe there's a greater than 50% probability he pays the $83 million?

He may have done it and he may not have. But she doesn't deserve $83 million from Trump, or any of the other twenty-one "hideous men" who she claims sexually and verbally assaulted her. Especially if she went into a dressing room in a department store to model a see-through body suit for the Donald, as she claims.

https://www.thecut.com/article/donal...805.1706308717

[Salty Again]

... 80-some Million! ... ... Is THAT it?
They shoulda made it 105 Million - 'cause "Over 100 Million!" surely
has more SHOCK value...

... 'Course I shouldn't need to explain to a barrister such-as YOU
that there's a difference between a judgement and COLLECTING on one.

So you understand and I understand that the appeal is coming.

(Oh, and Trump Didn't do it, mate. ... He's Innocent)

#### Salty

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

$80,000,000 is a lot of money, even for a billionaire. He'd have come out better by just admitting he did it.

83 but close enough.


what if Trump didn't assault that woman Carroll? Trump haters will believe anything negative about Trump but that doesn't mean is true does it?


you do know that Carroll has accused over 20 men of sexual assault? yet it's only Trump she sued in court.


it's also worth noting she had decades to make this claim and didn't until after Trump ran for president and that Reid Hoffman a billionaire major Dem supporter bankrolled her legal expenses?


nothing political here yeah?


Carroll also couldn't remember when exactly this supposedly happened in her court testimony changing the date several times.


most rape victims typically don't forget the time and date when it happened.


and if im not mistaken Carroll could only bring this civil charge long after the fact because New York passed their "metoo" law allowing a window for it.


and there is another possibility that she and Trump did have consensual sex and she just got vindictive that Trump wouldn't see her again.


if that's the case then not only is it clearly a sham political stunt it's also making false claims of a crime by Carroll


bahahahhaa

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

(Oh, and Trump Didn't do it, mate. ... He's Innocent)

#### Salty

Judge and jury both said he did.

Fact of the business is that he's a slanderer and a sexual assaulter. He has committed public defecation, errr, defamation and continues to shite on the laws of this country.

Why don't we re-litigate the entire case right here on ECCIE, like the missing GA ballots? Or the moon landing, for that matter!

LOLLING!

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Judge and jury both said he did.

Fact of the business is that he's a slanderer and a sexual assaulter. He has committed public defecation, errr, defamation and continues to shite on the laws of this country.

Why don't we re-litigate the entire case right here on ECCIE, like the missing GA ballots? Or the moon landing, for that matter!

LOLLING!

are juries infallible?

asking for my avatar


bahahaha

[Yssup Rider]

Only Trump is infallible, right?

baahbaaahblacksheeeeep

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Only Trump is infallible, right?

baahbaaahblacksheeeeep

i've never said Trump is infallible



see my post and tiny's .. the woman is a serial sexual assault accuser and as i recall even claimed her then husband assaulted her.



that article in Carroll's own words .. reads like a gold digging slut in a 4th rate romance novel

[VitaMan]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

i've never said Trump is infallible

if you say so

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

like they say in Missouri ... show me

[VitaMan]

Prove it

We are waiting

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

Prove it

We are waiting

are we in Italy where you are guilty until proven innocent? search function are back online again .. you find it.


everyone has flaws .. including you, me and Lord Trump. doesn't mean he's guilty

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

83 but close enough.


what if Trump didn't assault that woman Carroll? Trump haters will believe anything negative about Trump but that doesn't mean is true does it?


you do know that Carroll has accused over 20 men of sexual assault? yet it's only Trump she sued in court.


it's also worth noting she had decades to make this claim and didn't until after Trump ran for president and that Reid Hoffman a billionaire major Dem supporter bankrolled her legal expenses?


nothing political here yeah?


Carroll also couldn't remember when exactly this supposedly happened in her court testimony changing the date several times.


most rape victims typically don't forget the time and date when it happened.


and if im not mistaken Carroll could only bring this civil charge long after the fact because New York passed their "metoo" law allowing a window for it.


and there is another possibility that she and Trump did have consensual sex and she just got vindictive that Trump wouldn't see her again.


if that's the case then not only is it clearly a sham political stunt it's also making false claims of a crime by Carroll


bahahahhaa

Nobody knows what if anything happened at the Department Store except Carroll and Trump. But Trump and his attorneys weren’t allowed to question whether Carroll was lying at the trial. The jury had to accept with certainty that Trump raped her. Is that Orwellian or what? If I weren’t posting from a cell phone I’d link to LustyLad’s Kangaroo Court post.

[Yssup Rider]

This trial wasn't about the sexual assault.

This judgment was for defamation. Trump is the poster child for defamation.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

This trial wasn't about the sexual assault.

This judgment was for defamation. Trump is the poster child for defamation.

For the sake of argument say he didn’t sexually assault her. If that’s the case, should he have to pay damages for defamation?

This is a whole lot different from Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. We can be pretty confident they weren’t lying. I suspect Carroll was lying or exaggerating.