College Girls On Break

[Jet Streams]

Back when ads were permitted on this board, every May/June college girls in need of tuition money for the fall would post ads. I know the need hasnt changed, so where does a monger go to fill this need? Has OF taken over? God help us if it has.

[Wile E Coyote]

Unfortunately it has along with a few other avenues that providers can place ads on (OH2, Tryst, ect.).

I feel so lucky that I have my go to providers and I do not have to scan ads looking for a provider to spend my money on. Most of the time, they contact me first.

[oldbutstillgoing]

Hot ones have OF. Many are far better at SM. They troll IG, X, Snap, YouTube, etc. SA gets a bump this time of year. And apparently, those venues do a very good job of connecting them to well healed guys that can support the much higher prices they are getting now. Some still use other platforms that allow advertising. Not only are there fewer gals by far on here, but there are far fewer guys and hence far fewer reviews to help with making wise choices

[Sir Lancehernot]

I've seen nothing to indicate an uptick at SA. In fact, I keep broadening my search criteria and don't see significantly more or better results. I get hit on by girls from Manila to Kyiv, and Hartford to San Francisco, but, aside from a few from Dallas who either can't read or choose not to, very little from women west of 360. It is indeed the Western Wastelands. Maybe they are indeed all camming and OFing. Shrug.

[TinMan]

I can very much believe OF has changed the sex industry for the worse for those interested in p4p. There is good money to be made there, particularly for the naughty sexy coed.

I wouldn’t be surprised, though, if Congress one day unwittingly comes to our rescue and curbs the activities of sites like OF. The puritans will think they have won a battle against sin, only to drive more of them back to traditional SW.

[jonas1_2]

Originally Posted by TinMan

if Congress one day unwittingly comes to our rescue and curbs the activities of sites like OF

OnlyFans is just independent porn, and porn isn't going anywhere.

[Ruth484]

I'm on Seeking here and there and not seeing anything great. The ones that are good looking on there are have high expectations.

[TinMan]

Originally Posted by jonas1_2

OnlyFans is just independent porn, and porn isn't going anywhere.

I don’t know. Ken Paxton is making enough noise that I could see that effort gathering steam and engulfing OF.

Imagine if some of the longstanding internet protections get struck down (there is bipartisan support for that, and both sides have said it’s too easy for children to access pornography.

There will be workarounds (thank you Opera!), but if they put a big enough dent in the traffic the impact on wallets may be severe enough that good old-fashioned whoring will come back in style.

[oldbutstillgoing]

Originally Posted by TinMan

I don’t know. Ken Paxton is making enough noise that I could see that effort gathering steam and engulfing OF.

Imagine if some of the longstanding internet protections get struck down (there is bipartisan support for that, and both sides have said it’s too easy for children to access pornography.

There will be workarounds (thank you Opera!), but if they put a big enough dent in the traffic the impact on wallets may be severe enough that good old-fashioned whoring will come back in style.

While there is some explicit content on OF for free, the vast majority of it is behind a paywall. That satisfies the states age verification process for viewers. At least for now

[TinMan]

Originally Posted by oldbutstillgoing

While there is some explicit content on OF for free, the vast majority of it is behind a paywall. That satisfies the states age verification process for viewers. At least for now

I had not considered that. Damn, I was hoping for a quick fix.

[Arcane]

Middling young women aren't hawking their OFs for $5/month. It's more FOSTA/SESTA and being a felony preventing them from mildly being fucked by old guys who think they can fuck for a half hour and pay them $300, i.e., 60x whatever OFs is

[oldbutstillgoing]

Originally Posted by Arcane

Middling young women aren't hawking their OFs for $5/month. It's more FOSTA/SESTA and being a felony preventing them from mildly being fucked by old guys who think they can fuck for a half hour and pay them $300, i.e., 60x whatever OFs is

Those who treat OF as a job can make far more than any escort. That $5 per person? Multiply that by a few thousand a month. Why fuck any guys for even $500 an hour when you can make $5000, $10,000 or far more a month without fucking anyone? But it takes work to get to that point. Some of those women are making millions a year. Why wouldn't a good-looking gal want to try that instead of hooking or stripping? And that $5 is not the norm unless they are doing a promo. $20, $30 a month is very common. And before someone cries simp, so what? its their money to spend as they want, they could care less that some don't agree. And calling simp will not change that.

[jonas1_2]

Originally Posted by oldbutstillgoing

Those who treat OF as a job can make far more than any escort.

Lol. No: there is a very small percentage of OnlyFans models who can actually make a decent living from their OF content alone, and an even tinier percentage of women who get rich from it. The vast, vast majority of wannabe models are in the same boat as the vast, vast majority of wannabe actors: supporting their dream by working odd jobs for low wages in the hopes they'll eventually catch their big break.

The vast majority of OnlyFans models make very little from their online content, so they would make more money if they instead focused on meetups. If a model has 50 subscribers paying her $10 per month, that's only $500 per month. An average escort can make that in just 2-4 sessions, which can be done in a single day.

[Arcane]

Originally Posted by oldbutstillgoing

Those who treat OF as a job can make far more than any escort. That $5 per person? Multiply that by a few thousand a month. Why fuck any guys for even $500 an hour when you can make $5000, $10,000 or far more a month without fucking anyone? But it takes work to get to that point. Some of those women are making millions a year. Why wouldn't a good-looking gal want to try that instead of hooking or stripping? And that $5 is not the norm unless they are doing a promo. $20, $30 a month is very common. And before someone cries simp, so what? its their money to spend as they want, they could care less that some don't agree. And calling simp will not change that.

It's simple. The least work for the most money. The ceiling for OF is obviously very high but most aren't even close - https://xsrus.com/the-economics-of-onlyfans.

The Gini index of OnlyFans is 0.83. The most unequal society in the world, South Africa, has a Gini index of 0.68. OnlyFans is less equal than an ex-apartheid state. OnlyFans is so unequal because chancers make accounts with zero fans, while big Instagram stars take their following with them.

The most realistic/approachable/feasible way for them to get a bag is to fuck for $300.

If they want to fight against https://www.reddit.com/u/Queenliviaa00, https://www.reddit.com/u/cutefruit18, https://www.reddit.com/u/littleredzoe, https://x.com/jasminxie, https://x.com/reillysandersOF, https://www.reddit.com/u/hannahsh0rny, or the retired (IG) https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-google&sca_esv=33f9500253f9057 3&sca_upv=1&q=rubysole628+redd it&udm=2&fbs=AEQNm0CULmqP1GYo0 NaXM6bNItKRa0EFyP9pUTMpqCaCR-wIGX5KA-seSsEHxAaBYKDcg-PBSB6ztGab3uDfBTn2lBKQzNyCgQOB pRaQq-yvZQwReHWVhARCZpoKX-i6AdTCfz-Pxvjw6unekMApoPJo5s5Dwqn-39AhiZZf18hehNH9BxBjj7WoSkbkcG ryc85zWZV4B6NlIULex0Xopg0cCMIl Kao_5w&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2yrrt7 PCGAxWD8MkDHex8Cy0QtKgLegQICxA B&biw=393&bih=676&dpr=2.75, good luck!

Not sure why you think they can just post nudes and simps will flock to them while charging $30/month - market is flooded AF with dimes and 18 year olds...

[Sir Lancehernot]

Originally Posted by oldbutstillgoing

Why fuck any guys for even $500 an hour when you can make $5000, $10,000 or far more a month without fucking anyone?

The primary (maybe only) rational reason I can think of is plausible deniability and risk mitigation. We're talking college girls here, remember. Most of them have, for the moment, aspirations of careers or marriage and families or both. I know there are differences between OF and regular porn, some of which mitigate against the widespread exposure that's inherent in doing porn, but any girl who makes millions isn't going to be able to fade back to being an unknown student very easily. Even less successful girls face the same risk of people they might not want to know finding out. With that $5 fee comes the necessity of putting your content out there so that millions of people can see you and be interested enough to fork over that amount.


As an escort, you're still able to shield yourself from completely showing your face or other identifying parts of your anatomy in whatever ads you appear in, so that you can always say, "That's not me!" It's also easy to work in one geographic area that's far enough away from your regular stomping grounds that the risk of discovery is lessened. I've met a few dancers who were (allegedly) college girls who drove to DFW on weekends to work because they were pretty much assured that no one in their "civilian" lives would walk into the club they were working in.


Escorting, dancing, and even sugar dating (I think that's where many of the girls the OP is asking about are.) can be done to so as to lessen the risk of exposure for those who care about it. Porn and OF depend on widespread exposure for the performer's success.


Just my 1/50th of a dollar, and worth what you paid for it,