Review repudiation is, generally speaking, an ill-conceived marketing tactic, but I completely understand the urge to beat up a keyboard in self-defense when less than flattering (or downright offensive) remarks are made against one's reputation. The result of review rebuttals, unfortunately, is often the worsening of a bad situation. I believe the majority of the membership here, providers and hobbyists alike, agree that the best way for a provider to reject a negative review is to allow the review to die quietly, even if the review is dishonest. I am among that majority.
That being said, it has come to my attention that a recent review of my service presents inaccuracies which may adversely affect a certain demographic's decision to give me their hard-earned dollars. At 400 of those dollars for an introduction, this is no small issue and emotions may run high upon discovery of the truth.
The information to which I object is in the public portion of the review under "physical description." Before I point out the inaccuracy, I ask you to consider the following descriptions against which I have no dispute:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtabsw
Showcase stats are accurate - 5'8 & 135 ; 36C-30-36
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwy69
5'7-8" 135 ish lbs. and in very good shape. Nice perky and responsive nipples, a few unobtrusive tattoos and a nice clean kitty with just the right amount of ass to hold or to watch bounce a little. Very pretty face!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shy guy
5'8" average, fits her profile. Very pretty
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crashkopf
I'd say around 5'7, 34b, maybe 140lbs.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdiemaker59
web site says 5' 8" 125. I think she has put a few on!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigk91
Nice lips, nice smooth legs, and a cute little ass cheeks that fit perfectly in my hand, and on my face.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gluteman
5'7", 130 lbs, carrying just a tad extra these days but I like her with a little meat in that ass. Pretty face, smile and eyes. Sexy cum catching dimples.
|
The description posted in my showcase:
Ethnicity :Caucasian / White
Build: Curvy
Measurements: 36C-30-36
Breasts Enhanced: No
Height: 5' 8"
Weight: 135lbs
Eyes: Brown
Hair: Other (Long)
Piercings: Ears
Tattoos: A Few
Grooming: Bare
Smoking: Occasional / Social
I've never asked any of my clients to lie about my appearance and I don't condone white knight behavior. I haven't the slightest idea why anyone would describe me as
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holen1
5'7" - Athletic plus build. Huge awesome tits
|
But it the description does a disservice to the men here and does me no favors, especially sans recommendation. Obviously, I can't speak for the accuracy of the ROS, but (for me) the physical description given calls the entire review into question.
Call this post a threAD if you want. With review comments like
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimballs12
I'm curious on that too. Her profile says C's and the few pics I've seen don't seem to indicate giant knockers. Being a boob guy, those would bump her from Must See to Must See Now status for me.
|
I'm calling it a public service announcement.