Democrats Lawfare is American Fascism.

[berryberry]

This is how silly the leftists have become. They are outraged that the Supreme Court is to use their words ‘interfering in democracy’ by…allowing people to actually vote for a candidate and stopping the leftists illegal law fare

[DNinja69]

So SCOTUS has already heard the case and issued a ruling?

They will not exempt Trump from prosecution in Georgia but the ruling may dissolve any action taken in the form of removal from ballots unless Trump is found guilty.

I would hope to see him on the ballot in every state. Then the people can make their choice.

[berryberry]

Democrats Are Furious That Due Process Is Ruining Their Lawfare Schedule

Key points

Though the court expedited the case, arguments won’t be heard until April, with a decision likely to come in late June — making it unlikely, though not impossible, that there will be a trial before the 2024 election.

With this news, scores of left-wing pundits accused the justices of conspiring to help Trump win the election. By granting Smith’s request, Chris Hayes complained it “was a clear, unmistakable sign from the MAGA majority of the Trump-created court that they are with him. That they are going to use their power to make sure that he does not face trial in an election year for attempting to end American democracy.”

Sometimes, I wonder if Hayes and the others who happily watch constitutional protections and procedures dismantled when it suits their partisan needs know they are engaged in a mass act of projection.

Consider that Hayes demands SCOTUS render a judgment on a historic immunity case on a schedule that comports with the partisan objectives of Democrats – namely, putting Trump in front of a judge at the height of a 2024 presidential campaign. Or, in other words, Hayes wants the court to do the very thing he contends is corrupt for the court to do.

Notice, as well, that a “MAGA majority” court can only be legitimate if it rules in favor of the left. Like every institution, the contemporary left’s consequentialist outlook demands partisan outcomes. By “Trump-created,” of course, Hayes means the duly elected president nominated justices, and then the duly elected Senate confirmed them as prescribed by the Constitution. The self-styled guardians of “democracy” have spent years delegitimizing members of the court with a slew of smears and ginned-up non-controversies. Beats debating issues, I guess.

[DNinja69]

Trump did make some legit legal efforts to uncover election interference in 2020:

https://campaignlegal.org/results-la...2020-elections

But the 'lawfare' began when Donald Trump launched the initial salvo:

"President Trump demanded that I use my authority as vice president presiding over the count of the Electoral College to essentially overturn the election by returning or literally rejecting votes"

I would think most Americans would disavow the concept of using legal maneuvers to unduly influence the outcome of elections. This is not currently the case in 2024 but I continue to have hope that a moment of clarity is coming. Many Democrats would argue the current onslaught of indictments and attempts to remove Trump from ballots are things he provoked and brought upon himself.

Benjamin Rush once wrote that two wrongs don't make a right. They don't make a left either.

[Salty Again]

... Too right, Berry... With the Biden Presidency, there's been
NO adherence to the Law... When Joe gets slapped down by
Congress or the Courts, he just ignores them and creates
his-own rules by Executive Order.

Biden has further weaponised the FBI/DOJ against his foes there
just as OBama surely started the practice.

And THIS is where America is as a nation...
Which will now create a tit-for-tat situation - Next Year! ...

#### Salty

[berryberry]

9-0 Decision Shows How Far Removed Democrat Lawfare And Its Media Cheerleaders Are From Reality

[DNinja69]

The 9-0 vote has zero relevance to either party or just how delusional and misguided Trump enablers have become.

In other news Allen Weisselberg has pleaded guilty to perjury. Another one bites the dust.