When will Democrats stop killing unarmed black Americans?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Racism being alive and well in central Florida is a fact, not conjecture. The level of racism, and by which races against which other races is open for discussion. For you to claim otherwise makes you even stupider than I thought, and that was a very low standard to begin with. I have been threatened by Blacks, Whites, and various ethnic groups in Florida pleanty of times. Sometimes it is about my skin color, sometimes it's been because I don't hate "them" enough. Stupidity, bias, anger, hatred, or a mix of all: whatever your reason for denying racism exists in central FL it all serves the same sick end. The nicest explaination I can give for your actions is stupidity, and that itself is sad.

And case where a man was shot to death under questionable circumstances--and it does not go to a GJ when the shooter is known--does reek of closed door politics. Maybe it is justified, maybe not. The point is we don't know. But what we do know is you are now openly in support of non-open innocent and guilty verdicts. Welcome to the Gulag, Comrade! Papa Joe appreciates your support of his tactics to control the masses! With sympathizers like you, democracy will never win! What part of "open" do you disagree with, Comrade? You approve of the DA acting this way, so I ask why? Why is this better than letting the public see it air out in the open?

You also object to my stating my opinions/beliefs about life in FL that were formed from first hand knowledge and observation. Kind of you to once again claim that individuals are not allowed to have opinions unless approved by you. Yes, Comrade, I understand. The first rule of Comrade Che was to control the minds of the children, teach them that the Party always knows best and the Party will tell them what to think. You have learned well, Comrade.

No, Old-goaT, your posts in this thread have been nothing more than judgmental lies and suppositional distortions -- that is NOT a mere difference of opinion. That post at #98 truly revealed your predisposed biases and exposed the roots of your other lies and distortions.

[Old-T]

Learn to read, and maybe--just occasionally--answer a question.

Why do you think disposing of a case involving the death of a man should be done of behind closed doors?

Why do you feel so threatened by people having opinions that differ from yours?

What gives you the right to claim other people's opinions and experiences do not count if they are contrary to yours?

Three simple questions.

I'm waiting.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Learn to read, and maybe--just occasionally--answer a question.

Why do you think disposing of a case involving the death of a man should be done of behind closed doors?

Why do you feel so threatened by people having opinions that differ from yours?

What gives you the right to claim other people's opinions and experiences do not count if they are contrary to yours?

Three simple questions.

I'm waiting.

All you are doing is attempting to deflect from your lies and distortions. Your lies and distortions do not represent a 'difference of opinion', and they never will.

[Old-T]

Bravo Hypocrite Boy! You are nothing if not a broken record: you ignore hard questions that you can't answer, and you deny anyone else the right to think differently than you.

I'll pose the 3 questions again and see if you answer them--I don't want to be accused of not giving the simple minded a little extra time to think. It they turn out to be too hard for you to answer I'll post the answer key in a while.

Carry on comrade.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Bravo Hypocrite Boy! You are nothing if not a broken record: you ignore hard questions that you can't answer, and you deny anyone else the right to think differently than you.

I'll pose the 3 questions again and see if you answer them--I don't want to be accused of not giving the simple minded a little extra time to think. It they turn out to be too hard for you to answer I'll post the answer key in a while.

Carry on comrade.

...............

All you are doing is attempting to deflect from your lies and distortions. Your lies and distortions do not represent a 'difference of opinion', and they never will.

[dearhunter]

When you two are done..........the answer to the "why no GJ" question is quite simple.

The Special Prosecutor is removing the possibility that a GJ might return a "No Bill" on the request for indictment........which would be a political nightmare for someone......why worry about the law at this point.......she does not need a GJ to move to trial......just give that mexican jewish democrat a jury of black democrats and let the system work.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

When you two are done..........the answer to the "why no GJ" question is quite simple.

The Special Prosecutor is removing the possibility that a GJ might return a "No Bill" on the request for indictment........which would be a political nightmare for someone......why worry about the law at this point.......she does not need a GJ to move to trial......just give that mexican jewish democrat a jury of black democrats and let the system work.

I will reserve final judgement until we see if Zimmerman is brought to trial or not. I am betting on the "not", but will be pleasantly surprised if he is.

If it gets to a trial I would be very upset if it were a jury of 12 blacks--just as I would be upset if it were a jury of 12 mexican jews. Both would be a travesty of the system.

And if it goes to a fair and open trial, I will not care much which way it comes out.

[WTF]

Fat chance he will get a fair trial with 12 mexican jews!

[gnadfly]

His mother is Ecuadorian, not Mexican. Sweet summer rain.

[dearhunter]

My bad.........southern mexican jew

[gnadfly]

Southern Mexican Pre-Messianic Christian Card Carrying Democrat please. SSR.

[dearhunter]

"Pre-Messianic Christian"......the sons of Ham will string the bitch up......heh

[Jackie S]

Peruvian? Isn't that the Incas. Didn't they practice Human Sacrifice?

Good luck finding 12 jurors who still do that.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

Peruvian? Isn't that the Incas. Didn't they practice Human Sacrifice?

Good luck finding 12 jurors who still do that.

I bet there are a few on here who would be willing to. If they could pick the sacrifice.