Is Obama a Marxist?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

So, you're agreeing that Obama is a Marxist?

Another good one!

[Doove]

Originally Posted by WTF

Another good one!

Yeah, i'll give him that one.

[JONBALLS]

Obummer is leninist
Bush was a democrat

[Guest123018-4]

So when they take all of the rich people's shit and spend all that money where are they going to get the money to keep the ball rolling?
The first step is to attack a "class" until that "class" is decimated?
Then what?

They are not paying their fair share.
At some point you will have made enough money.

From each according to their ability....
Well when they take it all or even most of it, what happens to the ability?

Sounds like a Marxist to me.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by The2Dogs

So when they take all of the rich people's shit and spend all that money where are they going to get the money to keep the ball rolling?
The first step is to attack a "class" until that "class" is decimated?
Then what?

They are not paying their fair share.
At some point you will have made enough money.

From each according to their ability....
Well when they take it all or even most of it, what happens to the ability?

Sounds like a Marxist to me.

Social welfare recipients, who are able to work but choose not to, are nothing but parasites. Eventually the parasites will become so numerous that they kill the host. Democrats know that rewarding people for being parasites will destroy the country and they don't care. Social welfare is just a way to buy votes.

A dog can live with a dozen ticks but not with a thousand. When the dog dies, the parasites die too. That's where the social welfare state will take us if we don't reign it in. Our economy will be essentially dead. Then there won't be any wealth left to transfer. Margaret Thatcher said that socialism always fails because sooner or later you run out of other people's money.

The fundamental flaw of Marxism is that it destroys the incentive to work. People will not work if the government confiscates the fruit of their labor and gives it to someone else. Marxism is not consistant with human nature. People are not motivated by the common good; they are motivated by self interest.

[IIFFOFRDB]

This is FUNNY!

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

Obummer is leninist
Bush was a democrat

[Guest123018-4]

Exactly why there are "motivational camps".
Stalin
Lenin
Mao
Pol Pot
Ho Chi Min


BHO??

[Munchmasterman]

I clearly stated what I would need as proof. I then asked you what you would accept as proof.
And you weasled out of an answer again.

You love to ask those questions that you are unwilling to answer yourself. In your response below, you say "I asked the question first." Everyone knows that. I answered it.

I don't understand why you won't answer that question. Will you answer or should I just speculate why you decline?

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I asked the question first.

[essence]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Okay, lets settle this. This is for Dovebar, Munchie, OMG, and the RGOI; what would it take for you to except that Obama is a marxist other than an open admission from him? Tell us all what it would take. What action, what paper trail, what words by whom would convince you?

What would it take for you to convince us that you have stopped beating your wife/gf etc? Photos of umarked ass? Video testament from partner? Video of you getting beaten in SDM session?

Should i except (sic) an open admission from you?

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by essence

What would it take for you to convince us that you have stopped beating your wife/gf etc? Photos of umarked ass? Video testament from partner? Video of you getting beaten in SDM session?

Should i except (sic) an open admission from you?

Your "have you stopped beating your wife" ploy doesn't work in this scenario. The point of the "have you stopped beating your wife" joke is that a completely innocent man is being asked an unfair question.

It's a different situation when you ask a chronic wife beater if he's stopped beating his wife. Your free to believe or not believe that the evidence supporting Obama being a Marxist is conclusive; no reasonable person can contend that there is no evidence.

[JD Barleycorn]

Yes, I was right...I wasted my time going back and looking. Munchie did not answer the question. I asked (again) what would convince you that Obama was a socialist? Not the format or the venue. How about a signature of Obama on the convention list the Communist Party USA? Would that convince you? A picture of Obama in a Russian fur hat standing next to a statue of Lenin? What would you have to see? Now answer the question.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

Your free to believe or not believe that the evidence supporting Obama being a Marxist is conclusive; no reasonable person can contend that there is no evidence.

And no reasonable person can contend that there is no evidence that you're a racist.

You clearly are one, by the way.

[Af-Freakin]

Originally Posted by Doove

And no reasonable person can contend that there is no evidence that you're a racist.

You clearly are one, by the way.

+10000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by Doove

And no reasonable person can contend that there is no evidence that you're a racist.

You clearly are one, by the way.

I'm attaching a link to illustrate what happens when cultures care more about political correctness than defending innocent people from violent crime. If you were living in Great Britain, I have no doubt which side of the controversy you'd be on.

Don't forget, according to The United States Department of Justice, 37,000 white women are raped or sexually assaulted by black men every year in America. The number of black women, raped by white men, is close to zero. If those numbers were reversed, blacks would be outraged and they would demand that something be done; no one would expect them to remain silent.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ng-racist.html

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/read...px?ARTID=26368

[Can I Play Too???]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I'm attaching a link to illustrate what happens when cultures care more about political correctness than defending innocent people from violent crime. If you were living in Great Britain, I have no doubt which side of the controversy you'd be on.

Don't forget, according to The United States Department of Justice, 37,000 white women are raped or sexually assaulted by black men every year in America. The number of black women, raped by white men, is close to zero. If those numbers were reversed, blacks would be outraged and they would demand that something be done; no one would expect them to remain silent.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ng-racist.html

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/read...px?ARTID=26368

I was with you until this post. What kind of logic is this?