Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 389
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 273
George Spelvin 260
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70672
biomed162316
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453215
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48375
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41213
CryptKicker37175
Mokoa36491
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2013, 09:08 AM   #106
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninasastri View Post
Can the mods please delete the names in the headlines? It`s kind of strange to have fake names on top. I think the ones did not do it and now are scared

http://videos.huffingtonpost.com/tee...pect-517750242
That's a good idea and I am the thread starter. And deleted their name in my first post.

Replace their names with XXXXXX XXXXXXX.

ChicaChaser?
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 09:27 AM   #107
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Apparently, the surviving bomber is awake and communicating in writing:

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/bos...html?hpt=hp_t1

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's first words were: "My throat hurts. What's wrong with my tongue?"
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 12:37 PM   #108
Chica Chaser
Premium Access
 
Chica Chaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 18, 2009
Location: Mesaba
Posts: 31,149
Encounters: 7
Default

Why would I delete the names? They are in the public domain on sites of all types across the internet. Google returns over 223,000 hits on those names https://www.google.com/search?q=Suni...hrome&ie=UTF-8

Perhaps we should delete the word Obama or Bush from all threads? Those are someones names after all.
Chica Chaser is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 01:23 PM   #109
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Good idea then we can refer to them as idiot#1 and idiot #2
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 08:21 PM   #110
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
Apparently, the surviving bomber is awake and communicating in writing:

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/bos...html?hpt=hp_t1

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's first words were: "My throat hurts. What's wrong with my tongue?"
Yep! Questioned on Sunday and Mirandized on Monday: the U.S. justice system stumbled.

Federal agents at first questioned Tsarnaev without reading him his Miranda rights, under an exception to the rule invoked when authorities believe there is an imminent public safety threat, a Justice Department official said over the weekend.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/22/us/bos...html?hpt=hp_t1


Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post

Thank you. Captain Obvious.
Evidently it wasn't "obvious" enough, because you insinuated otherwise at:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
That's twice you mentioned "this administration" rather than the FBI.

Which I suspect is the real source of the problem for you.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 11:00 PM   #111
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Evidently it wasn't "obvious" enough, because you insinuated otherwise at:
What are you talking about? "Captain Obvious" referred to your statement that Slate was a liberal outlet.

What did you think it referred to?
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 11:03 PM   #112
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Yep! Questioned on Sunday and Mirandized on Monday: the U.S. justice system stumbled.
Really? How so? Have they used his statements against him?

Because if they don't, then there is no "stumble" except in your mind.
Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 01:37 PM   #113
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post
What are you talking about? "Captain Obvious" referred to your statement that Slate was a liberal outlet.

What did you think it referred to?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExNYer View Post

Really? How so? Have they used his statements against him?

Because if they don't, then there is no "stumble" except in your mind.
You'll find the answers to your questions already explained above, and as mentioned before, you “obviously” have reading comprehension problems. BTW, re-read this post if you feel you are compelled to re-post the same, redundant questions.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 03:35 PM   #114
Guest032516
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Apr 1, 2009
Location: TBD
Posts: 7,435
Encounters: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'll find the answers to your questions already explained above, and as mentioned before, you “obviously” have reading comprehension problems. BTW, re-read this post if you feel you are compelled to re-post the same, redundant questions.

I have no idea what that obfuscation means. But clearly you won't clarify your statement because you can't.

You informed us that Slate was a liberal outfit. I replied "Thank you Captain Obvious".

We all KNOW Slate is a liberal outfit. That's like telling us water is wet.But, apparently you didn't get the joke, because you then posted some reply to the effect that:

"Evidently it wasn't "obvious" enough, because you insinuated otherwise at:"

You then reposted my comments about how you twice mentioned "this administration" rather than "the FBI" when you were assigning blame for the lack of Miranda warnings. I was implying that you were just reflexivley blaming Obama for everything.

So just WHAT does THAT have to do with the wisecrack about "Captain Obvious"?

I doubt you can explain it, otherwise you would have already.

Guest032516 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved