Romney tops Obama

[Yssup Rider]

I'll only say it comes from Fox News if it comes from Fox News. No reason to give the credit to anybody less worthy. Odd.

Frankly, you won't find such a post on Fox News. You'll have to look elsewhere. Like the Heritage Foundation. American Family Association. Eagle Forum. Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas. Perhaps the most crazy of them all is the National Republicans themselves. Maybe even some of the YouTube channels suggested by some of the more outspoken new members of this forum. Somewhere like that. Fox is WAY too mainstream for that.

Of course, if you want to post a link, we'll happily discuss where it's from.

Just in case anybody else has a problem with this -- ENGLISH PLEASE! And click the blue letters with underlines!

[kaitanic]

Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

It is only fact in these guys books if you post a link that is in support of the progressive movement to socialism. If you post a link that is in support of smaller government and less spending they we then tell you that it came from Fox News....

Now Wyldeman, what you stated above is what we call a "fact."

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

It is only fact in these guys books if you post a link that is in support of the progressive movement to socialism.
Can you repost a link that states support for moving to socialism?


If you post a link that is in support of smaller government and less spending they we then tell you that it came from Fox News....
Links go where they go. Why would we say it went someplace it doesn't? Moot point since you don't post them.

You are using the word "support" as a verb. We're using it as a noun.

What's the difference? Figure it out.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by kaitanic

Now Wyldeman, what you stated above is what we call a "fact."

Good call. You guys state "facts".

We state facts.

If you find a fact of mine to be a "fact", let me know and I'll correct it or retract it.

You gotta prove it though.

[Yssup Rider]

+1

[Booth]

After watching last night's Republican debate in New Hampshire, I'm not sure how Romney is going to beat out Bachmann for the nomination. I disagree with just about everything that comes out of her mouth but she presented herself very well last night. Anybody else watch?

[Yssup Rider]

This Michele Bachmann?



http://youtu.be/FyLoRhf_gk8

[Booth]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

This Michele Bachmann?



http://youtu.be/FyLoRhf_gk8

Yes, the same one who won last night's debate. Doesn't that say a lot about her competition....

[WyldemanATX]

Do y'all have mommy issues? It seems as though all progressives are afraid of Michele and Sarah....

[Booth]

I said that she did very well. How do you read fear into that?

[WyldemanATX]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Good call. You guys state "facts".

We state facts.

If you find a fact of mine to be a "fact", let me know and I'll correct it or retract it.

You gotta prove it though.

I have only stated facts! I can't help it that progressives are so narrow minded and think only their networks are legit and the one other is fake....

Progressives also only believe the left side of the internet. Conservatives on the other hand only trust the right side.

Prove it hell you guys have not proven shit. I do not have to prove anything I just know it doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know that if you spend more than what you take in and if you over tax your people the ones that can will leave. If that does not make sense then I do not know what to tell ya except I think you are on your own. When shit here starts happen like it did in Greece, well lets just say I am prepared...

[budman33]

Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

I have only stated facts! I can't help it that progressives are so narrow minded and think only their networks are legit and the one other is fake....

Progressives also only believe the left side of the internet. Conservatives on the other hand only trust the right side.

Prove it hell you guys have not proven shit. I do not have to prove anything I just know it doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know that if you spend more than what you take in and if you over tax your people the ones that can will leave. If that does not make sense then I do not know what to tell ya except I think you are on your own. When shit here starts happen like it did in Greece, well lets just say I am prepared...

I find it funny people like to overuse the Rocket Scientist bit. As a someone who went to school in that field I can safely say that Rocket Scientists don't know a lot about a SHITLOAD things. lol

We're not overtaxing the people, we're under taxing corporations, because they are really good at not paying any. 2/3 of them pay none at all. lobbyists and off-shoring profits, that's what I'd like to see fixed. Never gonna happen and why?

The entire govt is full of elitist scumbags. 261 members of congress are millionaires and the longer they stay in congress the richer they get. Some have net worth's of 10's and hundreds of millions. Are they really of and for the people?

Every 2-4 years we get up in arms about the left and the right and the middle, and yet they are all the same.

I generally think of the Republicans and the Democrats just like I do the NFC and the AFC. we can argue all day about which one is better, but the truth is their all a bunch of spoiled idiots who only care about themselves, not the fans who have to pay 7 bucks for a fucking draft beer.

[Yssup Rider]

Well, on behalf of the progressives AND liberals, I'm glad you're expanding your bull's eye, Vyldeman. Guess you got tired of lumping everybody into one sack. Now you're using two! "Their networkS are legit and the other ONE is fake?" I'm going crosseyed here!

I don't have any issue with a woman being president of the United States. I supported Hillary Clinton last time around. But I do have problems with stupid people serving in that office. Don't mind assholes. Don't mind arrogant assholes. But to equate a concern with Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin with mommy issues is asinine... I think a lot of progriberals would favor having a woman in office ... just neither of those ignorant bimbos.

I don't think the internet has "sides." Only people who use it do.

You continue saying you don't need to prove anything. Like it or not, you're proving a lot of things in these threads.

(I recommend a cup of coffee and a couple of Ibuprofen.)

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You are using the word "support" as a verb. We're using it as a noun.

What's the difference? Figure it out.

It seems to me that you are making an assumption that he knows the difference between a noun and a verb. That might be a far reach!

[Booth]

Back to the debate last night, less than 1% of our population watched. It looks like Republican debates spell ratings disaster for CNN. Am I the only one here who watched it? Did most people stay tuned to FOX while it was going on?