Petraeus and Bhengazi

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by bigtex

Thatis what is more commonly referred to as the LL slight of hand? You can't dazzle them with your brilliance so you choose instead to baffle them with your bullshit! Some may fall for it. But don't consider me to be among them!

Bottom line: One has nothing to do with the other! Need I remind you that the 4,500+ American soldiers who lost their lives in Iraq, did not die because of "the towers, the pentagon, and in the ground in Pennsylvania."

They died because GW lost his focus upon the perpetrators of "the towers, the pentagon, and in the ground in Pennsylvania" and decided instead to search for WMD's in Iraq that no longer existed. Unfortunately over 4,500 U.S. citizens ended up losing their lives because of GW's ill fated and ill advised mistake made during the spring of 2003!

Assuming you're being truthful, you voted for GW twice!

And you call yourself a Democrat!

You're comparison is complete and utter bullshit BigKoTex. 9/11 2001 was more akin to December 7, 1941, than to 9/11 2012. How many died on December 7, 1941, and during the ensuing years under FDR? And since we're on absurd comparisons, what about the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Incident, BigKoTex? How many innocents died under LBJ because of that "attack"? And 128 Americans died on the Lusitania during the Wilson administration -- even though the Germans published a threat in the newspapers which Wilson, et al, ignored.

Benghazi-gate: four men died; Odumbo lied! APPEASEMENT!!!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're comparison is complete and utter bullshit ...

BT is not known for logical comparative examples when he is either ...

.......... obsessing or imbibing.

When he does both at the same time, it is unbearable.

But IBH, you do realize that BT knew there were no WMD's BEFORE any invasion in 2003.

BT: "....decided instead to search for WMD's in Iraq that no longer existed." (See, BT knew.)

Like Obminable, he just didn't say anything about it. He knew it was a waste of time, money, and people to look for something that was no longer there; rather than to expend that time, money, and people looking for OBL in Afghanistan where BT knew he was all along, and also neglected to mention it to Congress or the President as to OBL's whereabouts.

My theory is that BT kept quiet to assure failure on Bush's part, because he was (and is) still angry about Bush defeating McCain in the primaries in 2000. There is another "theory" to explain why he kept quiet, but that might involve questioning his ... err.... omniscience.....which simply angers him more deeply and antagonizes him unnecessarily into childish tirades of changing the subject to my political affiliation.

Bush beat McCain (VN Vet) and Bush beat Kerry (VN Vet) and Bush wasn't even in the "real military" .... which apparently pissed off BT. So when McCain comes up again in 2008 BT didn't support him against Obaminable, because Obaminable WAS in the "real military" .... wait ... sorry ........ Obaminable wasn't even in the "fake military"!!!

Which might shed some light on why he supported Clinton over Bush I (WWII vet) and Dole (WWII vet).

Go figure. Obsession and anger runs illogically deep. He's a Democrat?

But McCain is a Republican! .......... obsessing or imbibing ... yet again.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You know, when I ask you for a link, you always respond with "look it up yourself." You're an asshole, who is unable to comprehend simple concepts. Since I've no doubt you have trouble looking anything up yourself, because that would take at least a small amount of creativity and intelligence, which you don't have, I will do your work for you.

Try this.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/13/wo...pagewanted=all




Asshole.

Was a very good article told why he was there and looks like it was his call for not having more security.I think all who are blaming Obie should read this and STFU...

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

BT is not known for logical comparative examples when he is either ...

.......... obsessing or imbibing.

When he does both at the same time, it is unbearable.

But IBH, you do realize that BT knew there were no WMD's BEFORE any invasion in 2003.

BT: "....decided instead to search for WMD's in Iraq that no longer existed." (See, BT knew.)

Like Obminable, he just didn't say anything about it. He knew it was a waste of time, money, and people to look for something that was no longer there; rather than to expend that time, money, and people looking for OBL in Afghanistan where BT knew he was all along, and also neglected to mention it to Congress or the President as to OBL's whereabouts.

My theory is that BT kept quiet to assure failure on Bush's part, because he was (and is) still angry about Bush defeating McCain in the primaries in 2000. There is another "theory" to explain why he kept quiet, but that might involve questioning his ... err.... omniscience.....which simply angers him more deeply and antagonizes him unnecessarily into childish tirades of changing the subject to my political affiliation.

Bush beat McCain (VN Vet) and Bush beat Kerry (VN Vet) and Bush wasn't even in the "real military" .... which apparently pissed off BT. So when McCain comes up again in 2008 BT didn't support him against Obaminable, because Obaminable WAS in the "real military" .... wait ... sorry ........ Obaminable wasn't even in the "fake military"!!!

Which might shed some light on why he supported Clinton over Bush I (WWII vet) and Dole (WWII vet).

Go figure. Obsession and anger runs illogically deep. He's a Democrat?

But McCain is a Republican! .......... obsessing or imbibing ... yet again.

Yes. Been following BigKoTex's posts for about two years now. Every thing you've noted, he has done.

It’s funny how BigKoTex cannot fathom that the President of the United States IS as much the C-in-C of the Texas Air National Guard as he is the United States Air Force, and BigKoTex has never spoke disparagingly of CPT Harry S. Truman’s service on the Western Front as a member of the Missouri National Guard. There’s more than a little hypocrisy in BigKoTex.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yes. Been following BigKoTex's posts for about two years now.

Damn. You're lucky.

My "punishment" began in the ASPD days.

He's still obsessed with me. Then he moved to Austin!

Years ago I tried to get him to quit the sauce while posting.