BENGHAZI: OBAMA PROMISED ALL THOSE INVOVLED IN THE ATTACK WOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE .....HAHAHAHA !

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

More lame-ass finger pointing from the Master Lame-Ass Finger Pointer!

And he calls himself a Democrat!!!!!

Looking for solutions to "persuade" those disgruntled, disenchanted have nothings to leave us alone ....

.. how about this one?


If "we" could just get them to drink beer! We could settle everything in the backyard.

What do you think, BT? Work? Or are you still sticking to the "investigation mode" of problem solving?

Of course, we then have the problem of who to actually invite over for a beer .. don't we BT?


BTW.. the guy in the black outfit ... "doesn't exist" ... he is a mere figment of a digital imagination.

It is no wonder that your Fearful Leader is confused and chooses to simply pretend "they" don't exist.

See, it's real easy in picture No. 1. who is the "good guy" and who is the "bad guy" ... isn't it?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Actually, you are factually and historically wrong, again.

http://cryptome.org/bin-laden-aw.htm

And it's not God's fault either ...

... so using his name in a derogatory manner doesn't enhance your 100% incorrect response.

Since I know about these things and you have proven that you do not, the criminal case was filed 1998 and the arrest warrant was filed of record (in June 2000), which in case you have forgotten was when Bush was still Governor.

So, your buddy Clinton DIDN'T GET HIM. Remember the "Sudan"?

And if that "ain't" enough .... here's some more FACTS!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv...pect082998.htm

August 1998 ...

"The complaint also details two religious edicts, or "fatwas," issued by bin Laden, one declaring a jihad, or holy war, against Americans in August 1996, another encouraging Muslims to kill Americans "anywhere in the world where they can be found." Odeh, the complaint said, was well aware of the fatwas, and of bin Laden's provocative anti-American press interviews."

Here is the 1998 Grand Jury Indictment against Bin Laden:

http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/11/indict1.pdf

It alleges the known evidence against him by the Clinton Administration, which even fired missiles "at OBL"

.. but actually only killed some goats!

Have you ever seen Bush at the Twin Towers site proclaiming to get those responsible for this act?

Or were you digging through stupid Monika blue dress DNA?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Have you ever seen Bush at the Twin Towers site proclaiming to get those responsible for this act?

Yes, I did see it, and I heard it. So, why do you desire to skip over the reality.

To make another negative point about Bush. The bottom line is: If Clinton had gotten him it may have prevented 911 and the necessity of Bush to stand there and make that statement.

Three years later (after a warrant).. WTC .. went down ... if Clinton hadn't been so worried about getting his nob polished and his "reputation" .. all of that and the aftermath may have been avoided .... you can blame Bush for every fucking thing in the world ... and give everyone else a pass ...

... did Bush help get Zimmerman "off" too?

BTW .. did we hear the same committee hearings on 911? And did we read the same conclusions/recommendations?

Go back to the 1996 airline safety report by your man, Gore! Did you read Kerry's statement? Good grief, man.

Get a dose of reality .... you are focusing on a pep-rally to boost spirits and some other knitwit is reading banners!

History is repeating itself right in front of you .. and you are addicted to blaming Bush ... The final result was the culmination of years of intelligence work to locate OBL ... the hard work was done to cultivate a snitch and then it was wait for the right moment without telegraphing to the world we knew where he was. It was a joint effort .. it had NOTHING to do with "refocusing" or "loosing focus" ... it has to do with finding a needle in a haystack.

But killing OBL was never the cure all for defeating Al Qaeda .. anyone who thinks so ... is naïve.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yea, right. Keep trying. It shows.

Speaking of screen names Lexus Lover is that your phallic symbol or do you just whack off in the car?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Speaking of screen names Lexus Lover is that your phallic symbol or do you just whack off in the car?

No she whacks me off ... or better. Ever have the pleasure of knowing her?

She's not partial to assholes, so you really don't have much of a chance at it. She has standards.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Have you ever seen Bush at the Twin Towers site proclaiming to get those responsible for this act?

Yea.

And within a month paratroopers were on the ground in Afghanistan in the South while horseback riding special ops were in the North. We were there even though Clinton handed Bush a "2nd rate, ill-equipped military, with poor equipment for urban, desert fighting". Remember: Clinton was touting a "surplus" in the budget .. saving money.

The Clinton administration story-line during the hearings. Why they couldn't put ...

"boots on the ground"! (Makes me want to throwup!).

They couldn't get "permission" from the Pakistanis for "air space"????? Pussies.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yes, I did see it, and I heard it. So, why do you desire to skip over the reality.

To make another negative point about Bush. The bottom line is: If Clinton had gotten him it may have prevented 911 and the necessity of Bush to stand there and make that statement.

Three years later (after a warrant).. WTC .. went down ... if Clinton hadn't been so worried about getting his nob polished and his "reputation" .. all of that and the aftermath may have been avoided .... you can blame Bush for every fucking thing in the world ... and give everyone else a pass ...

... did Bush help get Zimmerman "off" too?

BTW .. did we hear the same committee hearings on 911? And did we read the same conclusions/recommendations?

Go back to the 1996 airline safety report by your man, Gore! Did you read Kerry's statement? Good grief, man.

Get a dose of reality .... you are focusing on a pep-rally to boost spirits and some other knitwit is reading banners!

History is repeating itself right in front of you .. and you are addicted to blaming Bush ... The final result was the culmination of years of intelligence work to locate OBL ... the hard work was done to cultivate a snitch and then it was wait for the right moment without telegraphing to the world we knew where he was. It was a joint effort .. it had NOTHING to do with "refocusing" or "loosing focus" ... it has to do with finding a needle in a haystack.

But killing OBL was never the cure all for defeating Al Qaeda .. anyone who thinks so ... is naïve.

I'm not blaming Bush for not getting Osama any more than you idiots are not blaming Obama for not getting the mastermind(s) of Benghazi...oh wait, you are! I was pointing out the hypocrisy in this thread.
.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

I'm not blaming Bush for not getting Osama any more than you idiots are not blaming Obama for not getting the mastermind(s) of Benghazi...oh wait, you are! I was pointing out the hypocrisy in this thread. .

You need to do a little updating on your knowledge base.

OBL was not "in custody" during the Bush administration.

It is CURRENTLY reported by Congressmen ....

... that the FBI will NOT interview those Benghazi perpetrators who ARE in custody.

Secondly, I never saw any reports that 911 was caused by a riot from a video!

Which might explain why the FBI doesn't want to do an "interview" of the arrestees!

(Read up on John O'Neill, who died on 911 at WTC as far as "getting someone" overseas.)

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Secondly, I never saw any reports that 911 was caused by a riot from a video!

Which might explain why the FBI doesn't want to do an "interview" of the arrestees!

.)

Speaking of updating your knowledge base....you do not even know why 9/11 happened.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

Speaking of updating your knowledge base....you do not even know why 9/11 happened.

Yep! A bunch of sexually uptight, homophobic, Islamic dudes can't deal with the daily stress of capitalist commercialism as expressed by bikini clad females selling feminine hygiene products on TVs in their communities -- let's not mention the disdain these dudes have for the misogynistic lyrics in rap songs and videos blaring and drowning out, and distracting from, the call to prayer.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

I'm not blaming Bush for not getting Osama any more than you idiots are not blaming Obama for not getting the mastermind(s) of Benghazi...oh wait, you are! I was pointing out the hypocrisy in this thread.
.

Actually, the CIA pretty much blames itself for that failure. See @:


https://www.cia.gov/library/center-f...sis_Iraq_5.htm

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Speaking of updating your knowledge base....you do not even know why 9/11 happened.

Actually, I do. The 1993 effort failed to bring down the WTC.

Which is similar to the reason why the 2003 invasion of Iraq happened ...

.. the 1991 cease fire deal didn't hold according to the U.N. resolutions.

http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0687.htm

If folks don't "finish" a job, they generally will come back and finish it, if they are determined.

The U.S. "problem" has been since WWII that "we" lack the resolve to finish.

Consistent with this thread, "we" even lack the resolve to protect our own diplomatic corps.

Our current clown for a President would rather tuck tail and run than stand toe-to-toe with a piece of crap.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

No she whacks me off ... or better. Ever have the pleasure of knowing her?

She's not partial to assholes, so you really don't have much of a chance at it. She has standards.

I did some checking around and there is a TS named Lexus working in Texas. You should have a review so we can see how good He/she is.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I did some checking around and there is a TS named Lexus working in Texas. You should have a review so we can see how good He/she is.

Don't be lying now.

The one you've known and enjoyed all these years is not a "she" ... mine is!

Do you always have your mind on you butt fucking and sucking cock?

Try some opposite sex activities for a change.

Sooner or later you will figure out what you are...after you mature a bit.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by lostincypress

Bin Ladin: We have seen in the last decade the decline of the American government and the weakness of the American soldier. Should read: "Weakness of the lib-retard MSM and panty-waisted dimotards." He is ready to wage cold wars but unprepared to fight hot wars. This was proven in Beirut when the Marines fled after two explosions, showing they can run in less than twenty-four hours. This was then repeated in Somalia. We are ready for all occasions, we rely on God.

http://www.meforum.org/435/usama-bin...e-paper-tigers


And it gave terrorists a major victory. The bombing drove the military from its peacekeeping mission in Lebanon and provided a blueprint for attacking Americans. The retreat of U.S. forces inspired Osama bin Laden and sent an unintended message to the Arab world that enough body bags would prompt Western withdrawal, not retaliation.
"There's no question it was a major cause of 9/11," said John Lehman, the then-secretary of the Navy, who today is a member of the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks.
"We told the world that terrorism succeeds."

On February 7, 1984, President Reagan ordered the withdrawal of US forces from Lebanon after some light shelling of suspected Shia positions and some brief French air attacks in the Bekaa Valley. How anyone can qualify a ten-hour barrage from the U.S.S. New Jersey as "light shelling" is unfathomable! The New Jersey’s 16 inch (406mm) guns fired shells, 2,700 lb shells with the mass of a Volkswagen, at the rate of four per minute for approximately ten hoursL ". . . these massive projectiles rained down on a Syrian command post in the Bekaa Valley east of Beirut, killing the general commanding Syrian forces in Lebanon and several other senior officers." (wiki) A raid on a camp where Iranian Revolutionary Guards were believed to be training Shia jihadists was called off by President Reagan because little evidence existed at the time that Iran was involved in the bombing.
The weak responses to the bombing by the US are believed to have emboldened jihadists around the world and contributed to the rise of Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed extremists in Lebanon.

http://michellemalkin.com/2012/10/23...racks-bombing/

Although New Jersey performed her job expertly during the intervention in Lebanon some have criticized the decision to have New Jersey shell Druze and Syrian forces. Members of this camp allege that this action forced a shift in the previously neutral U.S. forces by convincing local Lebanese Muslims that the United States had taken the Christian side;[33][34] New Jersey's shells had killed hundreds of people, mostly Shiites and Druze.[35] In his memoir, General Colin Powell (at the time an assistant to Caspar Weinberger) noted that "When the shells started falling on the Shiites, they assumed the American ‘referee’ had taken sides."[36]
The accuracy of New Jersey's guns was also called into question. This is wholly a lib-retard quibble. Those guns were just as accurate in 1983-84 as they had been in 1942-45. An investigation into New Jersey's gunfire effectiveness in Lebanon, led by Marine Colonel Don Price, found that many of the ship's shells had missed their targets by as much as 10,000 yards (9,140 m) and therefore may have inadvertently killed civilians. Tim McNulty, a correspondent for the Chicago Tribune based in Lebanon said, "Everybody loved the New Jersey until she fired her guns. Once she fired, it was obvious she couldn't hit anything."[37] The inaccuracy is believed to have resulted because the ship's main gunpowder had been remixed by the Navy, under the direction of Captain Joseph Dominick Miceli at the Naval Weapons Support Center, and rebagged. Powder lots (an individual production of powder) burn at different rates. Therefore, remixing the powder lots could cause the guns to fire inconsistently. The problem was apparently resolved after the Navy was able to locate additional powder supplies which had not been remixed.[38]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_New_Jersey_(BB-62)

Unknown to us at the time, the National Security Agency had made a diplomatic communications intercept on 26 September (the same date as the cease-fire ending the September War) in which the Iranian Intelligence Service provided explicit instructions to the Iranian ambassador in Damascus (a known terrorist) to attack the Marines at Beirut International Airport. The suicide attackers struck us 28 days later, with word of the intercept stuck in the intelligence pipeline until days after the attack.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/23/...ting-the-dots/

Mugniyah died in a mysterious car bombing in Damascus last year that may have been an Israeli counter-terrorist operation. Your point? He's dead! Mugniyah was the suspected mastermind behind the MNF attacks in 1983. What else do you want?

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/23/...ting-the-dots/

BTW, why were the Iranians even involved? Maybe, if that dimotard -- Jimmy the Peanut -- had supported a staunch U.S. ally rather than publicly ridiculing him, things in Iran would be different then . . . and today.