Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 391
Harley Diablo 375
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 274
George Spelvin 264
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70708
biomed162527
Yssup Rider60367
gman4453224
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48437
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino41515
CryptKicker37179
Mokoa36491
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35879
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2017, 05:18 PM   #91
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua View Post
I only call serial LIARS liberals EKIM ! Those that change their screen names to hide their shame over their candidate losing the election, those that claim to be veterans, those that claim to be high-end home builders, those who were defenders of odummer's attack on America, those who swore up and down that shrilLIARy was gonna win the election and ALL of YOU that are in the reach-around crew ! So, when YOU change YOUR name again, why not try one more " realistic " to YOUR "station in life". Like Pete R. Puffer !


You are a serial liar lemming, deflecting will not help your lying dingle berry infested ass.
Your station in life is a cocksucker, and you are content with it.
bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 01:50 PM   #92
myemailaddress75248
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 11, 2012
Location: dallas
Posts: 9
Encounters: 1
Default

When the source of your facts are questionable and extremely bias... the conclusions you derive will tend to be the same.
myemailaddress75248 is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 07:41 PM   #93
dilbert firestorm
Premium Access
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bamscram View Post
ya shot my squirrel ya meany!!!! dat squirrels got friends. LOL!

dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 07:48 PM   #94
bamscram
Valued Poster
 
bamscram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
ya shot my squirrel ya meany!!!! dat squirrels got friends. LOL!

bamscram is offline   Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 11:14 PM   #95
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 60,367
Encounters: 67
Default

OK! So Twitler DID shoot down another American missle...
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 01:54 AM   #96
Cowboy9269
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 8, 2013
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 60
Encounters: 5
Default

I don't know if a lot of Americans get this, but Trump has, and to some extent still does, take a lot of direction from analysis of American media, demographics, and big data and.

During his campaign, Trump didn’t have a lot of ‘Here is my agenda, here is my narrative, I have to persuade people to it.

In a very simplistic way of putting it, the Trump world throughout his campaign was, “Let’s say a lot of different things, they don’t even necessarily need to be coherent, and observe, through the wonderful new platforms that allow you to observe how people respond and observe what works, and whatever squirrel everyone chases, that’s going to become our narrative, our agenda, our message.”

To an extent this appears to be Trump’s approach to the public eye concerning his statements and governing as well.

And it makes sense. He's been aiming for an eight year term from the get go.

Basically, he has, and continues his approach of electioneering in the age of big data and social media

If you don't understand, look at his process and what he has used to get into office.
He continues to use this approach, as he is looking to the 2020 election.

In the course of the 2016 election, the Trump campaign ended up relying on three voter databases: the one supplied by Cambridge Analytica, with its 5,000 data points on 220 million Americans including, according to its website, personality profiles on all of them; theRNC’s enhanced Voter Vault, which claims to have more than 300 terabytes of data, including 7,700,545,385 microtargeting data points on nearly 200 million voters; and its own custom-designed one, called Project Alamo, culled in part from the millions of small donors to the campaign and e-mail addresses gathered at rallies, from sales of campaign merchandise, and even from text messages sent to the campaign. Eventually, Project Alamo also came to include data from the other two databases.

According to one estimate by a campaign insider, the Trump team spent in the high eight figures just on persuasion.

Cambridge Analytica came late to American elections, its British parent company, Strategic Communications Laboratories (SCL), has been a client of the United States government for years.SCLhas “provided intelligence assessments for American defense contractors in Iran, Libya and Syria,” according to theTimes, and developed so-called influence campaigns forNATOin Afghanistan.
Also in Afghanistan,SCLengaged in “target audience analysis” for the United States Department of Defense, identifying who was susceptible to American propaganda. The firm’s methodology, according to its website, has been approved by the UK Ministry of Defence, the US State Department, Sandia National Laboratories, andNATO. It seeks “to understand empirically what the right levers or ‘triggers and filters’ in a given population are, based on a penetrating psychological understanding.”SCLis currently seeking contracts with at least a dozen US agencies, andThe Washington Postrecently reported that it has already secured work with the State Department.

Cambridge Analytica is largely controlled by Robert Mercer, one of Trump’s major donors. According toThe Guardian, Mercer now owns 90 percent of the company, withSCLowning the remaining 10 percent. (Mercer is also the money behind Breitbart News, the website credited with serving up fake and hyped-up articles to incite Trump’s base.) Steve Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist and the former executive chairman of Breitbart News, was on the Cambridge Analytica board until he became the Trump campaign’s chief executive. Robert Mercer’s daughter, Rebekah, served on Trump’s transition team and has stayed on as a Trump adviser. She now runs Making America Great, a pro-Trump advocacy organization largely funded by her father that is dedicated to creating influence campaigns to push what has been called a nationalist—anti-immigration, anti-government—agenda. Its day-to-day director is Emily Cornell, who stepped down as Cambridge Analytica’s senior vice-president for political affairs to take the position.

Cambridge Analytica is also vying to create influence campaigns on behalf of the Trump Organization, the parent company of Trump’s various business interests.


Trumpsteam also figured out how to use all the marketing tools of Facebook, as well as Google, the two biggest advertising platforms in the world, to successfully sell a candidate that the majority of Americans did not want.

They understood that some numbers matter more than others—in this case the number of angry, largely rural, disenfranchised potential Trump voters—and that Facebook, especially, offered effective methods for pursuing and capturing them.

Facebook dark posts, used in tandem with more traditional attack ads, were part of the Trump team’s concerted effort to dissuade potential Clinton voters from showing up at the polls.

Unlike a regular Facebook advertisement, which appears on one’s timeline and can be seen by one’s friends, dark posts are invisible to everyone but the recipient. Facebook promotes them as “unpublished” posts that “allow you to test different creative variations with specific audiences without overloading people on your Page with non-relevant or repetitive messages.”


There were also three major voter suppression operations. One targeted idealistic white liberals—primarily Bernie Sanders’s supporters; another was aimed at young women—hence the procession of women who claimed to have been sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton and harassed by the candidate herself; and a third went after African-Americans in urban centers where Democrats traditionally have had high voter turnout.


Trump’s digital team was also aided by the candidate’s unbridled use of Twitter, by WikiLeaks, by fake news generators like Breitbart, and by an army of so-called “Twitter bots,” automated Twitter accounts—many of which are thought to have emanated from Russia and at least one thousand of which the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer claimed to have created. Together, all this sent a river of pro-Trump and anti-Clinton messages coursing into cyberspace, giving the Trump campaign a continually self-reinforcing narrative. And then there was the candidate himself and his blustery, contradictory pronouncements, often pandering to voters’ racially tinged resentments


Applying Cambridge Analytica’s algorithms, Trump’s data scientists built a model they called Battleground Optimizer Path to Victory to rank and weight the states needed to get to 270 electoral college votes, which was used to run daily simulations of the election. Through this work, the digital team identified 13.5 million persuadable voters in sixteen battleground states, and modeled which combinations of those voters would yield the winning number.

Near the end the data showed that people who lived in Rust Belt states had the most likely chance of delivering the presidency to Trump, Parscale’s digital team focused all its resources in those last few weeks on these voters. This included sending the candidate himself to Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania in the days before the election, even though those states were considered by most observers likely to be unsympathetic to him, because the reweighted Cambridge Analytica algorithms were pointing there, and those algorithms dictated the candidate’s travel schedule.

Trump still owns the database that was built, and it continues to serve him well. In the first three months of his presidency, when only 36 percent of the country gave him a favorable rating, Trump and the Republicans raised $30 million toward his reelection. As a point of reference, this is twice as much as Obama raised in the first three months of his first term, while enjoying much higher approval ratings.


Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but winning the popular vote does not automatically lead to the White House, and Trump was never going to try to appeal to the entire electorate.

What our Facebook president has discovered is that it actually pays only to please some of the people some of the time. The rest simply don’t count.
Cowboy9269 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 02:23 AM   #97
Cowboy9269
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Oct 8, 2013
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 60
Encounters: 5
Default

Something to think about:
When you look at history, a recurring strategy used to weaken a nation is to rile up different groups by amplifying their differences and quieting the the things they all agree to. Mix in some propaganda and "fake news" and it just accelerates the process.
If it's effective, groups within the country begin to attack eachother. Once there's enough confusion and infighting, they're attacked from the outside.
Basically divide and conquer.

This is why, however you feel about Trump, or "fake news" or Russian interference in our media, public opinion and election process, it's important to focus on what all Americans agree about. We have great wealth in this country, a high standard of living, opportunities, and FREEDOM to name a few things that most Americans would agree are good things.

A president gets 4 years in office, maybe 8. He's one branch of 3 branches of government. There are checks and balances. A lot of what he or she does domestically can potentially be strengthened, or reversed. Support the institutions, read the bills that are voted on in Congress, see who votes for what.


Figure out what you stand for and vote for people who you agree with- dont just let media, emotional manipulation, and social engineering drive your decisions on who to vote for.

Donald Trump made a lot of statements, but as his time in office progresses, his actions and decisions will give a clear idea of what he's really about.
You can't pass legislation and then do or say something opposite without it being clearly evident.
Cowboy9269 is offline   Quote
Old 07-07-2017, 11:11 AM   #98
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy9269 View Post

What our Facebook president has discovered is that it actually pays only to please some of the people some of the time. The rest simply don’t count.
Fascinating how articles like this BS analysis completely avoids speaking about how hildebeest overtly blew off voters she knew she couldn't win and those she wrongly "imagined" could never vote for a Republican. Hildebeest cancelled an event at Notre Dame alienating many Catholics (hildebeest's opinion of "believers" is well known), she didn't visit Louisiana after the 2016 flood (after all, what do conservative southerners have to offer her?) and she wholly ignored Wisconsin (because she thought she had them in the bag). So, it is very evident that hildebeest was the candidate that crassly calculated that some voters "just don't count."

Granted, what Breibart publishes has to be examined with scrutiny, but there have been times in the recent past where Briebart has published legitimate stories that the rest of the lame-stream media has attempted to suppress. To date, there's not one lame-stream media outlet that hasn't advocated the "Fake News" "collusion" story. Nothing illustrates this point better than how after a year of promoting that story CNN has yielded no proof to back up its claims. Conversely, in a matter of days CNN was able to track down and reveal the identity of a kid who made an unflattering meme about CNN. To pointedly criticize Breitbart without mentioning the "Fake News" of other lame-stream media sites is laughably disingenuous. And it remains a fact that it was hildebeest's dim-retard crew that wrote those emails and actively colluded against Bernie Sanders: not the Russians.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 03:11 AM   #99
Rey Lengua
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
Encounters: 21
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Remember how the resident assholes squealed when they caught President Obama in what they perceived to be a lie?

Well as of May 13, not one of them have acknowledged that Twitler might be bending the truth.

Maybe they're just using time to "prime the pump!"

I feel sorry for you dipshits. Your ignorance and arrogance have enabled Twitler to put you in an untenable position.

Who'll be the first to admit the emperor is wearing no clothes ... of course that's maybe because the disgusting bloat can't find anything that fits!
When he DOES find clothes, will YOU lying liberals want to " critique " his choice of "
threads " like YOU ALL did shrilLIARy's attire ? And, more importantly, Mr. DOTY 4 TIMES ! , will YOU or another member of the reach-around crew be picking his dinglebrrries prior to him enrobing ?
Rey Lengua is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 03:43 AM   #100
LexusLover
Valued Poster
 
LexusLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy9269 View Post

Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, ....
This is a broad, over-simplification of her "accomplishment," because her "winning" margin came from California and a county or two in New York state, and the result is exactly why the "Electoral College" was implemented to assure that a couple of highly populated States wouldn't end up selecting the POTUS.

Example: Just saw a report yesterday that Marin County, California, when 70% for HillariousNoMore!
LexusLover is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 08:23 AM   #101
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover View Post
This is a broad, over-simplification of her "accomplishment," because her "winning" margin came from California and a county or two in New York state, and the result is exactly why the "Electoral College" was implemented to assure that a couple of highly populated States wouldn't end up selecting the POTUS.

Example: Just saw a report yesterday that Marin County, California, when 70% for HillariousNoMore!
WTF 04-17-2017, 09:16 AM Post #38
ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
Thousands take to the streets to demand


WTF Stated: "…. LL....I'll fuck you up , you jack with me.”
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 08:27 AM   #102
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post


Granted, what Breibart publishes has to be examined with scrutiny, but there have been times in the recent past where Briebart has published legitimate stories that the rest of the lame-stream media has attempted to suppress. To date, there's not one lame-stream media outlet that hasn't advocated the "Fake News" "collusion" story. Nothing illustrates this point better than how after a year of promoting that story CNN has yielded no proof to back up its claims.
Give the investigation time...

Next, I'm wondering if someone associated with this Admin. is circulating fake documents hoping a news organization will bite so the Trump Admin can call into question legitimate news? It does appear someone is doing that. It will interesting to see who that someone is....
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 09:40 AM   #103
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Give the investigation time...

Next, I'm wondering if someone associated with this Admin. is circulating fake documents hoping a news organization will bite so the Trump Admin can call into question legitimate news? It does appear someone is doing that. It will interesting to see who that someone is....
The FBI began its investigation of this Russia hacking thing in 2015. Meanwhile, CNN tracked down and outed a kid for creating an unflattering meme about CNN just hours after it was first publicized. It's incumbent on the journalists and lame-stream media outlets to vet their sources before they go to print. The U.S. hasn't seen this type of "Yellow Journalism" since the 1890s.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 09:43 AM   #104
IIFFOFRDB
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
Default

IIFFOFRDB is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2017, 10:05 AM   #105
the_real_Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2017
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 5,453
Encounters: 34
Default

In 2003 the Florida Marlins beat the New York Yankees 4 games to 2. The New York Yankees scored 21 runs in the series compared to the 17 runs scored by the Marlins. Trump won the electoral college and that is the only vote total that counts.
the_real_Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved