Quote:
Originally Posted by moneytalksny
I keep reminding myself that the well is pretty deep and there are a lot more experiences to be had. Once the well runs dry I gonna have to bump the rule up to two visits  . But there's a long way to go especially with the likes of Frankie Fine, Veronica Boyt, etc...
When I do bump up to two at the top of my list are:
SexyDeeDee, Krystal Kurves, and hmmm can't think of another at the moment. in the past I found that by visit three providers were already asking for rides, meals, loans, etc... I tend to be more on the soft side so I've done what I could to help but the one visit rule offsets my weakness.
By the way, there have been a few recent exceptions |
MTNY,
Here we seem using the term 'providers' in manner slightly tinged with emotion, and past [hurtful?] experiences, none of which is a bad thing. But do not providers, much like their patrons, come in an extremely bewildering variety of characters? Or, are there some few common features that are true for all providers, regardless of the past personal histories, economic and educational backgrounds, etc. that compel them into this profession? And does this clutch of characteristics make them generally unstable in specific ways and mostly unfit as partners, mates and long-term romantic and life companions? Would it be fair to say that those are the questions we are asking?
Can we say that if their patrons are drawn from a general population and share no specific features that can pin them down as "johns" vs. the "virtuous rest of the world", the same may or may not be true of providers as well?
Just for argument's sake, let us assume, that providers also come from this general population without any specific defining attributes. Then, like their patrons, will they also not fall along a simple Gaussian distribution, i.e. a "Bell Curve" albeit one having different shapes according to different initial assumptions, like "providers often are reacting to childhood sexual abuse" etc.
But even in the stereotypical bell-shaped curve, there are the outliers, the exceptions. The exaggerated middle is often an artefact and often misleading, and if tamped down, will increase the proportions of the "outlier" populations! Both the really "good" ones and the really "bad" ones will then tend to increase!
Hollywood has a fascination with the "Hooker with the Golden Heart" and since the 40s, I believe there have been more than a dozen classic movies made on this theme. Are these completely imagination, or is there some truth to these drawn from corresponding elements in the real world? I have no idea.
Is everyone only out there for the money?
Do only psychologically afflicted women enter the business or does the business make their existing psychological vulnerabilities worse to the point where they cannot create a loving relationship with patrons, nor patrons with them?
We have heard of cases on ECCIE where a provider has turned around and become a successful housewife and hotel manager, but not with a former client. Very important point.
Would be very interested in hearing more about these questions, since not a single lady here is under any compulsion, like child trafficking, so prevalent in other societies.
