Conservatives attack Thurston Howell Romney (and I love it!)

[CuteOldGuy]

God, Timmy, you're an idiot. I don't use anything, and I don't advocate it. I just think people should be free to do what they want.

I was even told by a doctor that medical marijuana would help me with a condition I have, and I refused. Now why don't you STFU with the personal attacks about things you know nothing about.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

God, Timmy, you're an idiot. I don't use anything, and I don't advocate it. I just think people should be free to do what they want.

I was even told by a doctor that medical marijuana would help me with a condition I have, and I refused. Now why don't you STFU with the personal attacks about things you know nothing about.

I knew that would hit a nerve. Sorry if the truth hurts. You do admit that Johnson has admitted that he is a huge stoner who has a history of drug and alcohol abuse. You admit that, right? Because it is the truth.

I don't know why you just don't admit it. It's OK with me, I don't care. I agree with your stoner candidate's position on the issue. I think all Americans should be free to use drugs like him....I just don't want a stoner to be President.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by timpage

I knew that would hit a nerve. Sorry if the truth hurts. You do admit that Johnson has admitted that he is a huge stoner who has a history of drug and alcohol abuse. You admit that, right? Because it is the truth.

I don't know why you just don't admit it. It's OK with me, I don't care. I agree with your stoner candidate's position on the issue. I think all Americans should be free to use drugs like him....I just don't want a stoner to be President.

Good lord, Simpleton Timmy!!! The president you elected -- Odumbo -- is a self-admitted former member of the "Choom Gang", and *he wrote* that he stayed stoned through high school and college! You're ridiculous!

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by timpage

I just don't want a stoner to be President.

isn't that statement contradictory????

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Good lord, Simpleton Timmy!!! The president you elected -- Odumbo -- is a self-admitted former member of the "Choom Gang", and *he wrote* that he stayed stoned through high school and college! You're ridiculous!

we already have 2 stoners as president, Clinton & Obama.

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

isn't that statement contradictory????



we already have 2 stoners as president, Clinton & Obama.

Let's not forget GWB the coke-head alcoholic.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by markroxny

Let's not forget GWB the coke-head alcoholic.

do you have a cite on the claim that GWB was a coke-head? I know he's ex-alcoholic.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

do you have a cite on the claim that GWB was a coke-head? I know he's ex-alcoholic.

You can decide for yourself if it is true.


http://www.salon.com/1999/10/18/cocaine/

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

You can decide for yourself if it is true.


http://www.salon.com/1999/10/18/cocaine/

Your statement, "You can decide for yourself if it is true", points to a singularly distinguishing difference between Bush 43 and Odumbo. In one case, you have a third party -- with an agenda -- making highly questionable allegations based on "hear-say" evidence from unnamed sources against Bush 43. In Odumbo's case, well Odumbo openly admitted to his drug use in his biographies. Yep, this is an instance where it's pretty easy to "decide for yourself" which one is true and which one isn't true.

[i'va biggen]

What was it that scrambled your brains IB coke or hash or just token???

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

What was it that scrambled your brains IB coke or hash or just token???

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You are so confused, Ekim the Inbred. Keep trying. One of these days you might post something clever or insightful, but it isn't happening today. Now go take your nap.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You are so confused, Ekim the Inbred. Keep trying. One of these days you might post something clever or insightful, but it isn't happening today. Now go take your nap.

Kicked your dumb ass again..poor IB

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Kicked your dumb ass again..poor IB

Stop wasting your breath, Ekim the Inbred. You'll need it for your blow-up date later this evening.

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

a singularly distinguishing difference between Bush 43 and Odumbo.

Yes, one admits openly to their mistakes and the other has them covered up.

Poor IB

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-s...l_b_37786.html

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your statement, "You can decide for yourself if it is true", points to a singularly distinguishing difference between Bush 43 and Odumbo. In one case, you have a third party -- with an agenda -- making highly questionable allegations based on "hear-say" evidence from unnamed sources against Bush 43. In Odumbo's case, well Odumbo openly admitted to his drug use in his biographies. Yep, this is an instance where it's pretty easy to "decide for yourself" which one is true and which one isn't true.

I think they are both true. That is wtf I decided. You may decide something different based on the facts as we know them.

I think Obama told the truth and I think Bush Sr had the good sense to seal the record for Jr.

I understand the difference. One admitted it and the other did not. My point was we each can decide if the article has merit. I think it does. Folks have been convicted on less evidence.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by markroxny

Yes, one admits openly to their mistakes and the other has them covered up.

Poor IB

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-s...l_b_37786.html

Nothing but more innuendo, marks-rocks-with-pee. However, here are a few choice remarks from the article that you would do well to heed: ". . .the cocaine accusations against Bush have never been proven beyond a doubt . . ." and "Rumors about past drug use have dogged Governor Bush since his first days running for governor, but rumors should be regarded as only rumors until proven otherwise."

Furthermore, the author's suggestion that Bush 43's "fitness" for the presidency should be diminished by the unproven use of drugs is hypocritical. There's no doubt John Seery, the article's author, and you -- who offered this POS article as proof of anything -- voted for Odumbo in 2008 knowing Odumbo used drugs frequently.