Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!
FIND GIRLS
Shemales
HOT SEARCH
REGISTER
REPORT TRAFFICKING
Image Scrapbook
BROWSE BIO PAGES
Available Now
SEARCH LADIES
PAY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS
DISCOUNTED BANNER SUBSCRIPTIONS
SEARCH
M.ECCIE.NET

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
Reload this Page Who Put Classified Docs in Trump’s Desk
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70817
biomed163540
Yssup Rider61173
gman4453311
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48776
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43048
The_Waco_Kid37303
CryptKicker37227
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 3 4 5 6
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2022, 05:04 PM   #61
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... uh... any charges... where are they??

#### Salty
You haven't a clue about the process, have you.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:10 PM   #62
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,752
Encounters: 10
Default Lawnorder for Trump... But Not for Hillary or BLM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
That is not even close to what he meant.
Mind-reading again?

Why don't you let Mr. Rules-for-Thee-But-Not-For-Me answer the question himself?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:12 PM   #63
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Mind-reading again?

Why don't you let Mr. Rules-for-Thee-But-Not-For-Me answer the question himself?
You aren't going to understand it if you couldn't understand the last....

If you need help , just ask.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:14 PM   #64
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,752
Encounters: 10
Default Don't Google It, Just Recite Off the Top of Your Head
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
You haven't a clue about the process, have you.
And you do have a clue?

Please walk us through the history of the DOJ convicting anyone under the Espionage Act.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:18 PM   #65
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,752
Encounters: 10
Default That Sounds Like "Weak-Minded Arrogance"
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If you need help, just ask.
Like you always do?

Oh wait, I forgot - you're beyond help.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:20 PM   #66
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,245
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
You haven't a clue about the process, have you.
... What process is that?
The one where the Special Master decides what stays
and what goes?

### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:33 PM   #67
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
And you do have a clue?

Please walk us through the history of the DOJ convicting anyone under the Espionage Act.
I'll let 1b1 explain exactly what he meant ....and it wasn't wtf you assumed.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:33 PM   #68
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,001
Encounters: 2
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Did he break the law when the 4 corners of the law are read?
If he did, then he should be indicted. If not, then he didn’t evidently break the law.

If he is indicted they should move forward with a prosecution and proves beyond a reasonable doubt his guilt. A jury will decide whether they’ve been successful in doing so.

The fact that he was a former president shouldn’t make any difference. We’re 2 years away from an election that he will be part of. Being afraid to prosecute him now would be silly. If the prosecutors believe he is guilty they should proceed.

The fact that he has nut bag followers that will riot if he’s prosecuted doesn’t and shouldn’t matter either. That’s how a nation of laws knows it’s doing the right thing. When we start letting people walk because people will be mad that a criminal is prosecuted we may as well stop having a justice system we claim is fair.

Trump can defend himself in court like everyone else that gets prosecuted.
Well argued. Basically "no one is above the law." If not for my anarcho capitalist tendencies (lol) I'd probably agree with you.

I wouldn't send Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton to jail for violating statutes related to confidential records. But I could see the poetic justice, given the "Lock her Up" chants he encouraged.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:36 PM   #69
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... What process is that?
The one where the Special Master decides what stays
and what goes?

### Salty
Actually the SM is just going to eliminate attorney/client material.
Not sure why....they've already seen it.

I think there will be a trial after the midterm election....or Trump will plead out.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:49 PM   #70
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,752
Encounters: 10
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
I wouldn't send Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton to jail for violating statutes related to confidential records. But I could see the poetic justice, given the "Lock her Up" chants he encouraged.
I'm inclined to agree with your first sentence but not the second.

There's a difference between over-heated campaign rhetoric and actually prosecuting someone.

Two weeks after he was elected in 2016, Trump said he wouldn't push for Hillary's prosecution.

He even said "I think it would be very very divisive for the country" and "I don't want to hurt" her. Those are direct quotes, however un-trumpy-like they may sound.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:54 PM   #71
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,752
Encounters: 10
Default Another Cop-Out
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I'll let 1b1 explain exactly what he meant ....
So you admit you haven't a clue about the process, yet you're arrogant enough to accuse Salty of being as clueless as you are.

Got it!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 05:56 PM   #72
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 9,001
Encounters: 2
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Two weeks after he was elected in 2016, Trump said he wouldn't push for Hillary's prosecution.

He even said "I think it would be very very divisive for the country" and "I don't want to hurt" her. Those are direct quotes, however un-trumpy-like they may sound.
I didn't know that. Yes, I think Trump sometimes does try to push the "tough guy" image, but doesn't follow through when he realizes it's not the wise course of action.

This is a little off topic, but I wonder if something similar were going on when he recalled the jets that were sent to bomb Iran. I don't think he ever intended to attack Iran. He just wanted the Iranians to think he was crazy enough to do it. Same with the Little Rocket Man. So was this inspired foreign policy or reckless? I suspect the former.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 06:08 PM   #73
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
So you admit you haven't a clue about the process, yet you're arrogant enough to accuse Salty of being as clueless as you are.

Got it!
I briefly explained to Salty and I bowed out to let 1b1 explain what he meant to you. Two different things but I'm not suprised you're confused again.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 06:17 PM   #74
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default
You two do understand that Trump is not the one who makes that decision....nor does Biden.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 09-05-2022, 06:19 PM   #75
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
Well argued. Basically "no one is above the law." If not for my anarcho capitalist tendencies (lol) I'd probably agree with you.

I wouldn't send Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton to jail for violating statutes related to confidential records. But I could see the poetic justice, given the "Lock her Up" chants he encouraged.
Trump's case is significantly different than HRC's.

1. Out of 150,000 plus emails, only two paragraphs had a sentence marked with a "C" for classified.

2. The other documents that did contain classified information were not marked classified. The burden is on the sender to properly mark classified information. It's not on the recipient to figure out if a document that is not marked classified has classified material. This is what Comey based his ruling on. It was reckless for HRC to not realize she had classified material, but it was not properly marked. So, there was no intent to illegally possess classified material.

3. Even former Atty General Barr has said Trump had no business hording classified material at the MAR A lago.

4. General Petraus got into trouble for giving top secret information to his mistress so she could write a book. He did not have to go to jail.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 3 4 5 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved

Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Forum Guidelines - Top