Who Won Final Presidential Debate?

[tttalinky]

General Norman Schwarzkopf Jr, stated in an interview after he kicked ass in the first Gulf War.

" I never fight a battle with the enemy which has no strategic importance"

I think after watching tonights debate that Gov. Romney must have remembered that strategy!

[markroxny]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It remains, Odumbo's comment on bayonets was a lie,

Wrong again DIPSHIT.

http://www.popsci.com/technology/art...r-fix-bayonets

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Obama did nothing to reverse the momentum of Romney.

Romney won.

I think Mitt's strategy was to play it safe and be presidential. Obama was petty and appeared to be desparate; he didn't seem presidential. Romney did exactly what he intended to do. Romney will be the next president.

[tttalinky]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I think Mitt's strategy was to play it safe and be presidential. Obama was petty and appeared to be desparate; he didn't seem presidential. Romney did exactly what he intended to do. Romney will be the next president.

I agree JOE BLOE.....tonight we were able to see the next President of the United States at his best.......President Romney!

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I think Mitt's strategy was to play it safe and be presidential. Obama was petty and appeared to be desparate; he didn't seem presidential. Romney did exactly what he intended to do. Romney will be the next president.

This is pretty well the way I saw it. The president kept interrupting, and would simply fall back to the same old lame crap that we have seen for 4 years. Trying to explain away his "apology tour" was comical.

The "Jerry Springer" crowd will see the President as the winner, where rudeness and crass behavior is the order of the day. But Gov Romney kept his composure, acted Presidential, and gave the best closing, showing that if you re-elect the President, not only will you get what you have had for 4 years, but even more.

Who the heck wants that?

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

And so what exactly is your point?

. . . SNL laughs at the absurd, like Dan Quayle, remember?

SNL ridicules conservatives and props up liberals. It would be easy for SNL to make Obama out to be a fool. They never try to make him look bad.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by markroxny

Wrong again DIPSHIT.

http://www.popsci.com/technology/art...r-fix-bayonets

No, marks-rocks-with-pee, Odumbo lied when he said there were not as many bayonets today as there were in 1916. There are nearly 765,000 soldiers and Marines today, whereas there were fewer than 250,000 in June 1916. In both instances, the soldiers and Marines are/were ISSUED bayonets.

[markroxny]

You didn't read did you Dipshit.

That's ok, I love it when a debate happens and your guy loses and the best you have is a bayonet count.

Oh, and why didn't Romney attack Obama on Benghazi DIPSHIT?

Here's why..

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...falling-apart/

[tttalinky]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

I think Mitt's strategy was to play it safe and be presidential. Obama was petty and appeared to be desparate; he didn't seem presidential. Romney did exactly what he intended to do. Romney will be the next president.

Originally Posted by markroxny

You didn't read did you Dipshit.

That's ok, I love it when a debate happens and your guy loses and the best you have is a bayonet count.

Oh, and why didn't Romney attack Obama on Benghazi DIPSHIT?

Here's why..

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...falling-apart/

When you are ahead in a ball game and know a win is eminent, why pile on and run the score up.

[Yssup Rider]

"I LIKE AMERICAN CARS!" -- Mitt Romney.

Boy did he stick his foot in his mouth tonight on that one!

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

No, marks-rocks-with-pee, Odumbo lied when he said there were not as many bayonets today as there were in 1916. There are nearly 765,000 soldiers and Marines today, whereas there were fewer than 250,000 in June 1916. In both instances, the soldiers and Marines were ISSUED bayonets.

FUCKING LIARS! YOU ALL MISCOUNTED THE BAYONETS!!

How about the Horses, assholes?

[Yssup Rider]

OH and how about ALL the snap polls?

CRICKETS????

I know, it was Schieffers fault! Frankly he sucked. He should have given Romney more time to agree with POTUS.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by markroxny

You didn't read did you Dipshit.

That's ok, I love it when a debate happens and your guy loses and the best you have is a bayonet count.

Oh, and why didn't Romney attack Obama on Benghazi DIPSHIT?

Here's why..

http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...falling-apart/

Didn't have to read that article -- carried bayonet for duration of Afghanistan deployment! The U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corp still train with the bayonet. The Marines still train to use the bayonet mounted on a weapon; whereas the army now trains soldiers to use the bayonet in close combat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M9_bayonet

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

How about the Horses, assholes?

Horses were REPLACED by vehicles, dumbass. Already explained that Odumbo was too ignorant to acknowledge that there are more vehicles today than there were horses in 1916 so Odumbo had no point.

[CuteOldGuy]

They have still used horses in Afghanistan.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Horses were REPLACED by vehicles, dumbass. Already explained that Odumbo was too ignorant to acknowledge that there are more vehicles today than there were horses in 1916 so Odumbo had no point.

REALLY?

REALLY??


You may be the biggest dipshit in HISTORY!!!

I, too, had a bayonet. But I never had a horse. Of course your mama was probably sucking cock at the CYO at that time! You served? Must have been before the repeal of don't ask don't tell! I'm gonna go out on a limb here and says that the prospect of you protecting our country is slightly unsettling ...

don't mean to be disrespectful to US vets. Just you, shit for brains.