Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Was it in a Court of Law....under cross examination?
their signed affidavits are signed under penalty of perjury
my information is they were subject to and withstood depositions by the notorious perkins coie law firm
go and watch them in their entirety if you have the fairness of mind to do so and wish to have any basis for decision making whatsoever, of which currently you have none but are guided only by prejudice and feelings
Nevada judge agrees to hear Trump campaign evidence of alleged voter fraud
The evidentiary hearing is set for Dec. 3.
A judge in Nevada has set a date in December to hear from Republicans alleging widespread voter fraud in the state.
Judge James Russell of the First Judicial District Court will hear from attorneys representing President Trump's campaign at an evidentiary hearing on Dec. 3, at which up to 15 witnesses may be deposed, Russell said.
"The complaint is kind of a very limited nature, challenging basically the machine used in Clark County," the judge also said.
Trump campaign attorney Jesse Binnall said that the bulk of the evidence in the case will come from deposed witnesses.
"We will have whistleblower testimony showing that overnight, the disks that were used to hold votes would magically have votes appear and reappear on the same desk," Binnall said.
Democrat Joe Biden beat President Trump in Nevada by about 33,000 votes. However, the Trump campaign alleges that there are thousands of provable instances of voter fraud in the state — possibly enough to overturn the statewide result of the vote.
"We now believe that Donald Trump won Nevada, once you take out the fraud and irregularities," Binnall said on Fox Business. "And these are instances of dead people voting, people voting in multiple jurisdictions."
American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp called the hearing "big news."
"A lot of people in the national media have said, 'If you have evidence of voter fraud, show it.' Well, we have thousands and thousands of examples of real people in real-life instances of voter illegality. I just think it's a great step that we're going to have a chance to present it in court," Schlapp said during an appearance on Fox News.
What if the court finds evidence of fraud and says Trump won Nevada! I know, I know, it won't change the outcome but "IF" actual fraud is proven in one court, the attorneys figure they have something they didn't have in other cases and if there is even enough time, take this set of facts ( if proven ) to other states.
Apparently, the fat lady hasn't sung yet but she is warming up.
This is so Lucy with the football. They just keep falling for and them BAM ball pulled away. It’s gotta fee bad at some point. I’m starting to feel bad for the voter fraud believers. Just suckers.
What "if" it's just more of the same? More "eyewitnesses" that don't understand what they are seeing, or claims they were excluded from observing the counting process..because there were already numerous repubs inside.
At what point is enough bullshit enough?
When do you people stop stuffing "the alpha male's" pockets?
I don't see a lot of the base accepting the results of the overall results. It doesn't matter if a whole herd of fat ladies sing. There are a lot if people making too much noise to hear her...or them.
Nevada judge agrees to hear Trump campaign evidence of alleged voter fraud
The evidentiary hearing is set for Dec. 3.
A judge in Nevada has set a date in December to hear from Republicans alleging widespread voter fraud in the state.
Judge James Russell of the First Judicial District Court will hear from attorneys representing President Trump's campaign at an evidentiary hearing on Dec. 3, at which up to 15 witnesses may be deposed, Russell said.
"The complaint is kind of a very limited nature, challenging basically the machine used in Clark County," the judge also said.
Trump campaign attorney Jesse Binnall said that the bulk of the evidence in the case will come from deposed witnesses.
"We will have whistleblower testimony showing that overnight, the disks that were used to hold votes would magically have votes appear and reappear on the same desk," Binnall said.
Democrat Joe Biden beat President Trump in Nevada by about 33,000 votes. However, the Trump campaign alleges that there are thousands of provable instances of voter fraud in the state — possibly enough to overturn the statewide result of the vote.
"We now believe that Donald Trump won Nevada, once you take out the fraud and irregularities," Binnall said on Fox Business. "And these are instances of dead people voting, people voting in multiple jurisdictions."
American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp called the hearing "big news."
"A lot of people in the national media have said, 'If you have evidence of voter fraud, show it.' Well, we have thousands and thousands of examples of real people in real-life instances of voter illegality. I just think it's a great step that we're going to have a chance to present it in court," Schlapp said during an appearance on Fox News.
What if the court finds evidence of fraud and says Trump won Nevada! I know, I know, it won't change the outcome but "IF" actual fraud is proven in one court, the attorneys figure they have something they didn't have in other cases and if there is even enough time, take this set of facts ( if proven ) to other states.
Apparently, the fat lady hasn't sung yet but she is warming up.
Overall you have to be pretty dumb to believe that in the 32nd lawsuit some proof will be presented. Oh not that one, the 33rd. Ooopss not that one, the 35th umm 36th. Uh well surely the37th.
Think about it. Every lawsuit ends the same way. “If only we had more time to come up with proof and oh we need more money.
just watch the eye witness testimonies, all under oath, which is the proof
unless you are afraid you might learn somehting
So what differences dose it make if they were "all under oath" like this BSC bitch has so proudly proclaimed? Was it "the proof" that people "might learn" you're not one of those BSC morons?
A star witness for the Trump campaign was unable to back up claims that fraudulent ballots were "injected" into the vote count in Georgia when questioned during a hearing on Thursday.
Retired Army Col. Phil Waldron, who was called to testify at the Georgia state Senate hearing by President Donald Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, could not confirm allegations that a video showing bags being "pulled from a table" by election workers contained fraudulent ballots when questioned by Democratic Senator Jen Jordan.
"Are you trying to say that, in the video, what you saw were ballots that were somehow not lawful, that weren't real, that weren't actually cast by registered voters in the state of Georgia?" Jordan asked Waldron during the hearing.
"We do have affidavits of people who trucked in ballots from out of state into other states," Waldron replied.
Jordan then asked Waldron to clarify if he was claiming that truckloads of ballots had been moved into Georgia.
"Not into Georgia," Waldron admitted.
Waldron agreed when Jordan pointed out that election laws and vote counting processes differ from state to state. The senator then pressed Waldron on whether he was claiming that illegal ballots had been trucked into Georgia based on claims from other states.
"So, your opinion is based on the fact that there are affidavits of other people from other states who have alleged that they trucked in ballots to other states?" Jordan asked. "Your testimony is saying that, ergo, these ballots in this video must have been trucked in from other states and are unlawful?"
