Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!
FIND GIRLS
Shemales
HOT SEARCH
REGISTER
REPORT TRAFFICKING
Image Scrapbook
BROWSE BIO PAGES
Available Now
SEARCH LADIES
PAY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS
DISCOUNTED BANNER SUBSCRIPTIONS
SEARCH
M.ECCIE.NET

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
Reload this Page Time to impeach scotus judge Clarence thomas
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 267
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70798
biomed163388
Yssup Rider61077
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48710
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42878
The_Waco_Kid37233
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 3 4 5 6
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-04-2024, 04:44 PM   #61
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,639
Encounters: 1
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaliLama View Post
Prince Andrew yes, Trump…sorry no.
If you say so. Trump and Epstein were definitely friends.

https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/trump-and-epstein
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 04:49 PM   #62
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,639
Encounters: 1
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
From it's contents anyone with a clue wouldn't conclude Clarence Thomas did anything criminal.
Not if you read the statute on disclosures. It clearly states that a trip on a private jet that was a gift should be disclosed.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 06:23 PM   #63
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Not if you read the statute on disclosures. It clearly states that a trip on a private jet that was a gift should be disclosed.
What's the statute number?
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 07:11 PM   #64
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,935
Encounters: 46
Default
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7353



I would never address him as such because he has no honor. I'd just call him judge and the ladies their honor if I were before the court.
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 10:54 PM   #65
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,639
Encounters: 1
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
What's the statute number?
This is the statute number 5 U.S.C. § 13101(14). The link is in post #52 of this thread. You should be able to see it on page 28 of the document. You're welcome.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-04-2024, 11:28 PM   #66
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 10,687
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
This is the statute number 5 U.S.C. § 13101(14). The link is in post #52 of this thread. You should be able to see it on page 28 of the document. You're welcome.
He knows how to use google. It takes 15 seconds to find that statute. Levi is just sticking to his strawman argument bullshit and playing silly games as usual at this point. It is up to you to decide when you want to stop playing them with him.

I don't play back and forth silly games in this forum for a reason. Well, I would to be honest, but I don't think many of these blouses are worth getting banned over when I know that using objectivity and logic is a complete waste of time with many in here. LOL
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 12:14 PM   #67
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,639
Encounters: 1
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain View Post
He knows how to use google. It takes 15 seconds to find that statute. Levi is just sticking to his strawman argument bullshit and playing silly games as usual at this point. It is up to you to decide when you want to stop playing them with him.

I don't play back and forth silly games in this forum for a reason. Well, I would to be honest, but I don't think many of these blouses are worth getting banned over when I know that using objectivity and logic is a complete waste of time with many in here. LOL
You're right. Once in a while it's okay to go the extra mile to make a point.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 12:46 PM   #68
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
This is the statute number 5 U.S.C. § 13101(14). The link is in post #52 of this thread. You should be able to see it on page 28 of the document. You're welcome.
Ok, so that might be the only gift he was required to disclose and he failed to do so. The reason Federal Judges are required to disclose substantial gifts is to ensure that they aren't influenced by external sources. So to impeach any Federal Judge there would have to be something to indicate his decisions were based on personal gain rather than Law and facts. So failure to disclose a gift in and of itself may not be enough to impeach him.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 01:22 PM   #69
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,790
Encounters: 22
Default
It's clear Thomas is on the take.
Huge amounts of gifts from folks that Thomas will have an impact on thru their scotus cases. He will not recuse himself. Other big questions on ethic violations are being looked at. As his his failure to report and disclose all of his perks. Aka bribes
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 01:34 PM   #70
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie View Post
It's clear Thomas is on the take.
Huge amounts of gifts from folks that Thomas will have an impact on thru their scotus cases. He will not recuse himself. Other big questions on ethic violations are being looked at. As his his failure to report and disclose all of his perks. Aka bribes
Yeah, I bet you think he's the only one.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 04:39 PM   #71
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,193
Encounters: 25
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Yeah, I bet you think he's the only one.

I don't remember now which of the 3 liberal justices has some issues with a book she wrote. I think Sotomeir, but i could be wrong.
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 05:06 PM   #72
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmstud60 View Post
I don't remember now which of the 3 liberal justices has some issues with a book she wrote. I think Sotomeir, but i could be wrong.
I think this is what you are talking about.


https://apnews.com/article/supreme-c...29762cb8338c02
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 05:07 PM   #73
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,193
Encounters: 25
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
I think this is what you are talking about.


https://apnews.com/article/supreme-c...29762cb8338c02

That was it.
farmstud60 is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 05:11 PM   #74
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,790
Encounters: 22
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
Yeah, I bet you think he's the only one.
As far as being the most corrupt.
Biggly and hoogely not even close
He should be impeached immediately.
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 07-05-2024, 05:37 PM   #75
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie View Post
As far as being the most corrupt.
Biggly and hoogely not even close
He should be impeached immediately.
Well he probably won't. So don't lose any sleep over it.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Reply
Page 5 of 6 « First 3 4 5 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved

Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Forum Guidelines - Top