Bill Clinton's Worst Nightmare - Monica Is Writing A Book

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer is serving as Odumbo's front man in swing states. In the Florida panhandle, Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer is featured in an Odumbo promo every fifteen minutes. Every vote sucked away from Odumbo by Lewinsky re-exposing Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer is a vote to the good.

Who did romney have as a front man You know it wasn't ryan. He doesn't come off too well to seniors. You know, those people who make up @35% of that 47% receiving entitlements. The ones that used to vote republican?

Bill Clinton is on a replay of the Daily Show right now.

What lies has he made in these ads you're bitching about? Should be easy to list them and show links to prove them.

Wasn't he acquitted by the Senate? A Senate made up of 55 republicans and 45 democrats?

If he was a sexual predator, for what appears to be his whole adult life, why are there so few women coming forth? And, if I'm not mistaken, none since it hasn't been politically adventageous to produce them?

Plus I hate to piss on your parade but;

"Monica Lewinsky was rumored to be receiving $12 million for a tell-all about her alleged affair with former president Bill Clinton, but others say she has no such plans."

http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0921/Monica-Lewinsky-Will-she-or-won-t-she-release-a-new-memoir

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Who did romney have as a front man You know it wasn't ryan. He doesn't come off too well to seniors. You know, those people who make up @35% of that 47% receiving entitlements. The ones that used to vote republican?

Bill Clinton is on a replay of the Daily Show right now.

What lies has he made in these ads you're bitching about? Should be easy to list them and show links to prove them.

Wasn't he acquitted by the Senate? A Senate made up of 55 republicans and 45 democrats?

If he was a sexual predator, for what appears to be his whole adult life, why are there so few women coming forth? And, if I'm not mistaken, none since it hasn't been politically adventageous to produce them?

Plus I hate to piss on your parade but;

"Monica Lewinsky was rumored to be receiving $12 million for a tell-all about her alleged affair with former president Bill Clinton, but others say she has no such plans."

http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0921/Monica-Lewinsky-Will-she-or-won-t-she-release-a-new-memoir

Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer lies when he disavows participating in in the deregulation -- blaming it all on Republicans -- that brought on the current financial crisis. Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer signed the Financial Services Modernization Act under the advisement of his Treasury Secretary, Larry Summers (who also served as one of Odumbo's financial advisers), which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act which regulated speculation by banks. And let's not forget the role played in the financial meltdown by Odumbo's appointee and Summer's protege, Timothy Geithner. Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer is a convicted liar.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatch...ical-obama-ad/

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Kudos, Ekim the Inbred! Evidently you've mastered sucking and stroking on your Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer dildo and typing at the same time. That's a level of coordination you have not demonstrated before.

word has it you can change hands and gain a stroke..Kinda like strok'n and token..

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ekim008

word has it you can change hands and gain a stroke..Kinda like strok'n and token..

You heard or -- more likely -- you didn't understand, Ekim the Inbred, but damn, it sounds like you've discovered you are proficient at certain skills.

[Dawgs]

Clinton is a has committed perjury, so one has to assume that every thing that he says is a lie unless it can be verified by outside resources. His words in a court of law no longer mean anything.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by acp5762

Clinton's past won't have any impact on Obama. .

The real issue is will obama's present have any impact on obama

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

you would have thought he would have paid off lewinsky with an ironclad non disclosure few millions thrown her way agreement a long time ago ....

The is no such thing as an "ironclad non disclosure" ... and Bill tried that with the ladies he sexually harassed while Governor ... and that didn't work.... which is why he got disbarred in Arkansas .. for perjury ... after the Federal Judge in Arkansas so found. And for the "justifiers" he was lying under oath about a blow job ... it was about his fucking in Governor's mansion. Remember? He had the highway patrol bringing them into the mansion for him like "take out"!

He's a predator. Any CEO in this country would be fired and suffer a judgment that would consume everything in sight they might own or ever own. But he gets a pass on the "boys will be boys" defense?

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You heard or -- more likely -- you didn't understand, Ekim the Inbred, but damn, it sounds like you've discovered you are proficient at certain skills.

No Idiot Boy I do women you are the closet homo whacking in the basement of your parents home watching gay porn.

[ElisabethWhispers]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

...

He's a predator. Any CEO in this country would be fired and suffer a judgment that would consume everything in sight they might own or ever own. But he gets a pass on the "boys will be boys" defense?

I doubt the ladies that were being sexually active with the man felt that they were being abused. Perhaps afterwards. I would sincerely think that Monica feels that she got the short end of that stick.

But historically, the other woman does.

And "any CEO in this country would be fired" for having extra marital affairs? Getting fired is feasible but let's think about the men that we see. Or at least many of the men that I see.

I've seen a few get in trouble with wives but not fired.

Be against Clinton, that's fine. But don't refer to him in the same way as one would a rapist, or someone who mauls helpless females.

Now, go watch a few episodes of "Mad Men" and see glossy television examples of how it used to be with women in the workforce. And for the most part, still is.

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

The real issue is will obama's present have any impact on obama

Thats a good question. I think it could.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers

I doubt the ladies that were being sexually active with the man felt that they were being abused. .

They were all subservient employees ... "intern" .... as such whether they were agreeable or not it is sexual harassment and any CEO would get canned for having sex with subordinate employees .... as Clarence Thomas said:

... "that's the law" consensual or otherwise.

"Now, go watch a few episodes of "Mad Men" and see glossy television examples of how it used to be with women in the workforce. And for the most part, still is."

With all due respect I avoid watching television for my understanding of law and its relationship to the "workforce,"

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers

Be against Clinton, that's fine. But don't refer to him in the same way as one would a rapist, or someone who mauls helpless females.

Now, go watch a few episodes of "Mad Men" and see glossy television examples of how it used to be with women in the workforce. And for the most part, still is.

Slick Willie the Sexual Predator Perjurer’s record with women in subordinate positions epitomizes the definition of “sexual predator”. The transgressions on "Mad Men" are fiction. The crimes committed by Slick Willie are real! He violated Paula Jones, and then he lied to block her right to justice.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers

Getting fired is feasible but let's think about the men that we see. Or at least many of the men that I see.

Not to be labor it, but to support the reality:

"Monica Lewinsky worked at the White House, first as an intern and then as an employee, from July 1995 to April 1996. With the assistance of family friend Walter Kaye, a prominent contributor to political causes, she obtained an internship starting in early July, when she was 21 years old.(131) She was assigned to work on correspondence in the office of Chief of Staff Leon Panetta in the Old Executive Office Building.(132) As her internship was winding down, Ms. Lewinsky applied for a paying job on the White House staff. She interviewed with Timothy Keating, Special Assistant to the President and Staff Director for Legislative Affairs.(133) Ms. Lewinsky accepted a position dealing with correspondence in the Office of Legislative Affairs on November 13, 1995, but did not start the job (and, thus, continued her internship) until November 26.(134) She remained a White House employee until April 1996, when -- in her view, because of her intimate relationship with the President -- she was dismissed from the White House and transferred to the Pentagon.(135) "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../6narritii.htm

He was her superior.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers

Getting fired is feasible but let's think about the men that we see.

Monica Lewinsky worked at the White House, first as an intern and then as an employee, from July 1995 to April 1996. With the assistance of family friend Walter Kaye, a prominent contributor to political causes, she obtained an internship starting in early July, when she was 21 years old.(131) She was assigned to work on correspondence in the office of Chief of Staff Leon Panetta in the Old Executive Office Building.(132) As her internship was winding down, Ms. Lewinsky applied for a paying job on the White House staff. She interviewed with Timothy Keating, Special Assistant to the President and Staff Director for Legislative Affairs.(133) Ms. Lewinsky accepted a position dealing with correspondence in the Office of Legislative Affairs on November 13, 1995, but did not start the job (and, thus, continued her internship) until November 26.(134) She remained a White House employee until April 1996, when -- in her view, because of her intimate relationship with the President -- she was dismissed from the White House and transferred to the Pentagon.(135)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../6narritii.htm

Obviously, if some guy hands out a sign for an LLC and calls himself the CEO to impress .... ladies he dates ... he won't be firing himself .....

I'm talking about CEO's of major stockholder companies that might even approach the size of the Federal Government ....

... for the same behavior Clinton would have been fired, because the lawsuit against the company would be a slam dunk and it wouldn't matter if the subordinate employees got on their knees and begged him to let them give him a blow job!

He's a sexual predator. He's got a problem.

Hillary almost dumped him over the Arkansas mess when he was governor and made a deal with him. She would get a role in the administration if she didn't divorce him. That didn't work out once he got in the WH. She demonstrated her lack of competence. He was headed for a one-term Presidency.

I think she was thinking .. Clinton, Gore, Clinton.

Now she has really shot herself in the foot, with the Secretary of State!

[ElisabethWhispers]

Jeesh. Alright. The "Mad Men" reference was tongue in cheek. But I guess that I do come across so seriously most of the time that no one "got it".

I actually revised the really snarky comments that I was going to post when mentioning that show!

Whatever else is debated with regard to my above statement is fine. All good points.