Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
The Sandbox - AustinThe Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here
Since Trump's loyalists are out and about let's ask a question:
Remember when Trump talked about Michelle Obama not wearing a scarf when visiting Saudi Arabia, neither Ivanka or Melanie wore one. Nothing to say?
Oh remember when Trump talked about Clinton accepting money from Saudi Arabia for her foundation. Ivan is just took 10 times as much from them. Nothing to say there?
Or wait wait, remember Obama was weak because he didn't say Radical Islamic Terrorists? Trump is the big tough guy remember? He's a pussy. He didn't say it. He caved in. What's up with that?
"Saudi Arabia and many of the countries that gave vast amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation want women as slaves and to kill gays. Hillary must return all money from such countries!"
fast forward to yesterday:
IVANKA TRUMP'S FOUNDATION ACCEPTS $100 MILLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA AND UAE.
Should Ivanka not accept the money or should apologies be sent to the Clinton Foundation? OR do we just ignore/forget it because it's a Trump and its ok when a Trump does it?
Also, do we factually know what Donald Trump's financial ties are to Saudi Arabia?
Never happened? So you know for a fact that no one involved in the campaign was colluding with Russia? Please tell me how you know that? Give us the evidence it didn't happen.
Even if they were colluding with Russia. Where is the law against it?
The Obama administration colluded with a foreign government to influence Israel's election. No law against that either.
No Russia didn't hack machines to change votes. But you can't say it didn't factor into someone who may have voted for Clinton deciding to sit the election out. Also, if the stuff that was leaked by Russia via WikiLeaks wasn't effecting voters, why did Trump read all them every time at rallies? Why did he talk about them more on debates and in public than he did policies?
It had an effect on some. Keep pretending it didn't. That it was leaked just to be leaked by a foreign government.
If it had an effect on some then they didn't have the strength of their own convictions in the first place.
Hey millsy... er (cough, cough), I mean, Austin Dude... have you even thought this whole thing through? What if, for the sake of argument, we assume the worst about the 2016 Trump campaign? What if someone (Russian or otherwise) DID approach Mike Flynn, let him know they had John Podesta's DNC emails, and asked if they should publish them? What exactly is the crime? Was Flynn supposed to say "No! You mustn't publish any embarrassing dirt on our political opponent!" LOL! What law was broken here?
Did hildebeest's campaign tell NBC and the other major networks not to disclose that secret 11-year-old Access Hollywood tape? Or did they collude with their media friends to have it released at the most opportune moment, 3-1/2 weeks before Election Day? Did hildebeest decline to take advantage of those offers from CNN's Donna Brazile to be supplied with debate questions in advance? You know the answers.
Right now there is no evidence of any "collusion" between the Trump campaign and the "Russians". But even if such evidence does emerge, so what? While the libtard media would do everything possible to maximize the political embarrassment to Trump, at the end of the day there would be no crime or impeachable offense.
Here is respected Harvard Constitutional Law Professor Alan Dershowitz (a "proud" hildebeest voter) addressing the questions you and your hyperventilating libtard co-conspirators haven't even given a thought to:
Well, I'll address the head scarfs - Saudi Arabia said they welcome foreign visitors no matter what they wear.
And so we have evolved to not wearing them. Which I think is a good thing. I think the welcome that President Trump is getting from Saudi Arabia is awesome. And I don't use that word that much. And how about that fly over with the smoke coming out red,white and blue. They love Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin Dude
Since Trump's loyalists are out and about let's ask a question:
Remember when Trump talked about Michelle Obama not wearing a scarf when visiting Saudi Arabia, neither Ivanka or Melanie wore one. Nothing to say?
Oh remember when Trump talked about Clinton accepting money from Saudi Arabia for her foundation. Ivan is just took 10 times as much from them. Nothing to say there?
Or wait wait, remember Obama was weak because he didn't say Radical Islamic Terrorists? Trump is the big tough guy remember? He's a pussy. He didn't say it. He caved in. What's up with that?
A little early in the day to be hitting the bottle, isn't it?
Must be millsy reincarnated.
No it's not if I was. It's a Sunday in Austin, plenty of people are out. Sorry if you have no friends.
But tell me where is the drunken statement? You said that someone wouldn't have strength of their own conviction if they let WikiLeaks change their opinion. Trump "changed" his opinion on Syria because of "pictures". Nevermind the fact that the previous attack was worse and also had pictures. Yet then they didn't effect him and he said we would stay out of Syria. Sounds like not only does he like strength of conviction; apparently his was talking about things over his head.
But yeah I guess when it's obvious that he's doing what you said voters would have been doing, go with drinking.
No it's not if I was. It's a Sunday in Austin, plenty of people are out. Sorry if you have no friends.
But tell me where is the drunken statement? You said that someone wouldn't have strength of their own conviction if they let WikiLeaks change their opinion. Trump "changed" his opinion on Syria because of "pictures". Nevermind the fact that the previous attack was worse and also had pictures. Yet then they didn't effect him and he said we would stay out of Syria. Sounds like not only does he like strength of conviction; apparently his was talking about things over his head.
But yeah I guess when it's obvious that he's doing what you said voters would have been doing, go with drinking.
