"Je Suis Nigeria"?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Of course you were waiting on me! Look at how quickly you respond to my posts (while on the contrary they are many of your useless posts on here I don't reply to at all).

Too bad you can't read, stupid bigoted IB. Just a few posts up I AGAIN stated that slave owners were morally wrong. ALL slave owners. Northerners, traitorous Confederates, Cherokees, Africans, Arabs, etc. ALL. Comprehend that little three letter word?

But you do not. You continue to support torture, servitude, murder, etc., ESPECIALLY when done by the confederate states. You know how to end this, but you won't. You can't bring yourself to admit the confederate was wrong about anything, and you would cut your tongue out before saying I was right even in something as blatantly obvious as this.

So be happy as a slave apologist. That's what you are.

In a slave society, a slave is regarded as a slave by all, Old-THUMPER, not just the owner. Hence, your WKing for the Cherokee while denigrating "European" southerners is hypocritical, Old-THUMPER, and your supercilious judgement of a nineteenth century society with a 21st century moral code is stupid, Old-THUMPER. And your self-conceit, Old-THUMPER, is exceeded only by your stupidity.

[Old-T]

Oh my! IB Full Meltdown Alert!

According to IBMassa' when I say that Cherokee slave owners were morally wrong he equates that to WKing for the Cherokee.

And, buy your stupid logic, in a slave society--let us say South Carolina in 1859--there could be no people speaking out for abolition since, according to you, everyone there would "recognize" the morally correctness of slavery. Sorry to inform you, that is not how it happened.

You are not only a liar, but a very stupid one at that.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Oh my! IB Full Meltdown Alert!

According to IBMassa' when I say that Cherokee slave owners were morally wrong he equates that to WKing for the Cherokee.

And, buy your stupid logic, in a slave society--let us say South Carolina in 1859--there could be no people speaking out for abolition since, according to you, everyone there would "recognize" the morally correctness of slavery. Sorry to inform you, that is not how it happened.

You are not only a liar, but a very stupid one at that.

You equivocate (AKA "lie") when you choose to focus on "slave owners" and ignore how Cherokee society during that period -- the society you are WKing for -- was a slave society, Old-THUMPER. Perhaps you would be gracious enough to cite for consultation abolitionist tracts written by a dozen or so notable Cherokee abolitionists from that period to prove you're not a hypocrite, Old-THUMPER?

[Old-T]

Now you claim the Confederaty was actually made up of nothing but Cherokee!

You are even stupider that I gave you credit for. And trust me, I thought you were VERY stupid.

But as I predicted, not a single admission from you that any confederate traitorous slave owner ever did anything wrong. At least you are consistent, IBBigot.

[shanm]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Now you claim the Confederaty was actually made up of nothing but Cherokee!

You are even stupider that I gave you credit for. And trust me, I thought you were VERY stupid.

But as I predicted, not a single admission from you that any confederate traitorous slave owner ever did anything wrong. At least you are consistent, IBBigot.

I think "very stupid" is a compliment when it comes to IB Wanker.

[shanm]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Now you claim the Confederaty was actually made up of nothing but Cherokee!

You are even stupider that I gave you credit for. And trust me, I thought you were VERY stupid.

But as I predicted, not a single admission from you that any confederate traitorous slave owner ever did anything wrong. At least you are consistent, IBBigot.

On a side note, don't expect to offend IB by calling him a bigot. He prides himself in being a racist, backward-minded cockwad.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by shanm

On a side note, don't expect to offend IB by calling him a bigot. He prides himself in being a racist, backward-minded cockwad.

So claims the dimwitted lib-retard, shamman, who has been factually bested in every exchange to date

Originally Posted by shanm

I think "very stupid" is a compliment when it comes to IB Wanker.

It's well established that you'd be among the "very, very stupid", shamman.

Originally Posted by Old-T

Now you claim the Confederaty was actually made up of nothing but Cherokee!

You are even stupider that I gave you credit for. And trust me, I thought you were VERY stupid.

But as I predicted, not a single admission from you that any confederate traitorous slave owner ever did anything wrong. At least you are consistent, IBBigot.

You thinking that you "thought" is yet another indication of your stupidity, Old-THUMPER. And you'd be the supercilious, judgmental hypocrite imposing 21st values on nineteenth century societies, Old-THUMPER; the same supercilious, judgmental hypocrite who cannot cite abolitionist tracts written by a dozen or so notable Cherokee abolitionists from that period to prove you're not a hypocrite. You'd also be the conspicuous liar who cannot substantiate where anyone claimed that the Confederacy was solely comprised of Cherokee, Old-THUMPER. What was said, you lying illiterate jackass, is that the majority of Cherokee were pro-Confederate.

[Old-T]

Poor brainless IB.

YOU are the one fixated on Cherokee slaves. But go back to what you said: in a slave so itsy ALL acknowledge the righteousness of slavery.

MY rebuttal of your argument was not about the Cherokee, but about the slave states. They were by definition a slave society. And within those slave state so Indies there were strong abolitionist voice especially. Thus your statement that all in the society supported slavery was wrong. Just like most your pathetic rants.

Get over it--you are an angry slave master wannabe, nothing more. Your grand and glorious southerners in the early to mid 1800s had flaws, just like every other civilization past or present. You are just too egotistical to admit it. And as much as you would like it to be otherwise, the guilt if Arabs and northerners and Cherokee and others doesn't make that confederate plantation owner any less guilty and morally corrupt.

Odd how so many who believe the demand side of drugs needs to be severely squashed and punished as evil, refuse to see the demand side of slavery the same way.

Rant on. It is so amusing to see you flail.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

"Account Disabled"! Look at who it was who walked away: the "#Grubered", cock-sucking, Odumbo Minion! Good show, lustylad!



By WKing for the Cherokee, Old-THUMPER, you've been caught WKing for slave-owning Confederates, Old-THUMPER. You're a wormy little hypocrite, Old-THUMPER. Squirm, Old-THUMPER, squirm like the wormy little troll you are.




Cite where that ever happened, shamman.



You still haven't explained why you lied and misrepresented Dr. Rothschild's position on syphilis like you are now lying and misrepresenting Mr. Lamb's position regarding the Crusades, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp.

54

[Yssup Rider]

It's frustrating for someone looking to debate politics with narrow minded, sotter robots like you and your Klan, errr, Clan, IBIdiot. I enjoyed the way UC thrashed you and your butt buddies. I hope he comes back, but if he seriously desires honest discourse, he won't.

It's like walking into a redneck honky think and screaming the N word. You boyz just lose it!

Great job, CHICKEN DICK.

[shanm]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So claims the dimwitted lib-retard, shamman, who has been factually bested in every exchange to date

Why don't you go ask your butt muncher LustyIdiot that?

BTW, did you learn "some grammar" yet?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Poor brainless IB.

YOU are the one fixated on Cherokee slaves. But go back to what you said: in a slave so itsy ALL acknowledge the righteousness of slavery.

MY rebuttal of your argument was not about the Cherokee, but about the slave states. They were by definition a slave society. And within those slave state so Indies there were strong abolitionist voice especially. Thus your statement that all in the society supported slavery was wrong. Just like most your pathetic rants.

Get over it--you are an angry slave master wannabe, nothing more. Your grand and glorious southerners in the early to mid 1800s had flaws, just like every other civilization past or present. You are just too egotistical to admit it. And as much as you would like it to be otherwise, the guilt if Arabs and northerners and Cherokee and others doesn't make that confederate plantation owner any less guilty and morally corrupt.

Odd how so many who believe the demand side of drugs needs to be severely squashed and punished as evil, refuse to see the demand side of slavery the same way.

Rant on. It is so amusing to see you flail.

It's amusing to see you pathetically flounder in your little pool of hypocrisy as you feebly try to deflect from how you were caught WKing for a 19th century slave society, Old-THUMPER.

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

54

Rumor has it, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp, you're so pathetic with math that you had to invite your cousins over in order to employ their fingers and toes in your count to 54. BTW, Stumpy the Inbred Chimp, with 54 squandered opportunities behind you now, you've never explained why you lied and misrepresented Dr. Rothschild's position on syphilis and Mr. Lamb's position in regards to the Crusades.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It's frustrating for someone looking to debate politics with narrow minded, sotter robots like you and your Klan, errr, Clan, IBIdiot. I enjoyed the way UC thrashed you and your butt buddies. I hope he comes back, but if he seriously desires honest discourse, he won't.

It's like walking into a redneck honky think and screaming the N word. You boyz just lose it!

Great job, CHICKEN DICK.

Hasa Diga, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. You're a profligate liar that's been refuted at every turn, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Originally Posted by shanm

Why don't you go ask your butt muncher LustyIdiot that?

BTW, did you learn "some grammar" yet?

Your improper use of grammar in your post exemplifies how you do not know enough about grammar to be a grammarian, shamman.

[Old-T]

You truly are a piece of work. Warped, but unique (fortunately).

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

You truly are a piece of work. Warped, but unique (fortunately).

You're sputtering, Old-THUMPER, as you flounder in your little pool of hypocrisy feebly trying to deflect from how you were caught WKing for a 19th century slave society.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I enjoyed the way UC pinch-hit for me so I didn't have to strike out all the time. I hope he comes back, because otherwise I know you will turn your indomitable intellects and rapier wits back to whooping my flaky libtard ass again.

FTFY.

Undercunt's free-lance contract with eccie was not renewed. He accepted a new job trolling an LGBT hook-up site and is reportedly much happier there.