Trump and the anthem

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

No, I do not believe Roy Moore. I think Franklin is a douchbag and always has been so yes- I would believe his accussors.
And Bill Clinton - he admitted it too (after he lied about it,of course)
It is the ultimate hypocrisy that Franklin was "all about women's rights" and than you look at that picture - where she is sleeping,in a very vulnerable position and he is pretending to grab her breasts - no,just no.

You're all over the place here. It sounds like you pick when to believe accusers. 10 plus women have come out against Trump and you decide not believe any of them. Double digit accusers and your defense is well he denies it. That's fucking stupid. OJ Simpson denies killing anyone... I guess we must all believe OJ. I mean I have to because a proclamation of innocence is held in such high regards. And there have been two people that have come out against Franken and you're already predicting more. Your blindspot and hypocrisy for Trump is sad. You're sounding like those Democrats you're lambasting about who were defending Clinton.

It's the ultimate hypocrisy when a people complain about a man golfing and then goes on to golf way more than that man. It's the ultimate hypocrisy when a man says he will do more for HBCUs than the previous guy and then does less. It's the ultimate hypocrisy to accuse another person of vacationing too much on taxpayers dime and then constantly vacation on taxpayers dime to your own resort. Literally paying yourself. More hypocrisy... Trump calling Obama out on his using EOs too much and then doing it himself and bragging about it. That's only some of it. Yeah if you want to call out hypocrites, I will wait on you to call out Trump............

[Austin Ellen]

No, I'm not. Show me the pic where Trump is groping women-where's the proof? Not just words.
And did you forget that O.J. wrote a book on how he did it?
And yes, I'm partial to Trump - but if you showed me a picture like the one in which Al is in - than yes, I would have a problem with him. But there is no picture because it didn't happen. Or perhaps you know of some other evidence - such as DNA on a blue dress..
Actually, Hillary is one of the biggest hypocrites too (besides being a loser-I loved that tweet by Trump) for her to say she is a champion of women makes me gag.
And Predator Clinton - you are gonna see more women coming out against him - and very soon.

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

You're all over the place here. It sounds like you pick when to believe accusers. 10 plus women have come out against Trump and you decide not believe any of them. Double digit accusers and your defense is well he denies it. That's fucking stupid. OJ Simpson denies killing anyone... I guess we must all believe OJ. I mean I have to because a proclamation of innocence is held in such high regards. And there have been two people that have come out against Franken and you're already predicting more. Your blindspot and hypocrisy for Trump is sad. You're sounding like those Democrats you're lambasting about who were defending Clinton.

It's the ultimate hypocrisy when a people complain about a man golfing and then goes on to golf way more than that man. It's the ultimate hypocrisy when a man says he will do more for HBCUs than the previous guy and then does less. It's the ultimate hypocrisy to accuse another person of vacationing too much on taxpayers dime and then constantly vacation on taxpayers dime to your own resort. Literally paying yourself. More hypocrisy... Trump calling Obama out on his using EOs too much and then doing it himself and bragging about it. That's only some of it. Yeah if you want to call out hypocrites, I will wait on you to call out Trump............

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

No, I'm not. Show me the pic where Trump is groping women-where's the proof? Not just words.
And did you forget that O.J. wrote a book on how he did it?
And yes, I'm partial to Trump - but if you showed me a picture like the one in which Al is in - than yes, I would have a problem with him. But there is no picture because it didn't happen. Or perhaps you know of some other evidence - such as DNA on a blue dress..
Actually, Hillary is one of the biggest hypocrites too (besides being a loser-I loved that tweet by Trump) for her to say she is a champion of women makes me gag.
And Predator Clinton - you are gonna see more women coming out against him - and very soon.

Wow you guys are something else. So now words don't matter now either. A person can be caught on tape saying things that prove his predator nature and you say.. well there isn't a picture. You guys need to go tell all those people locked up because they were caught on a wire admitting to a crime that they need to appeal because audio isn't credible, only video/photo evidence. Words are more than enough proof. And if this weren't Trump and it some Democrat caught on tape admitting to something, those words would be all the proof in the world for you. Just admit that you don't want to believe the accusers because you like Trump. That's all it is.

Oh and maybe look up the facts. It wasn't written by OJ. And it was about if he had done it. But that's besides the point. We all have strong feeling that OJ killed someone, yet OJ til this day denies it. Yet you are claiming that because he is denying it, we should put onus on that.

Actually Hillary Clinton has done a lot for women. She is more an advocate for woman than Ivanka Trump who Trump people swear is the champion for women. That's utter bullshit. And again with the hypocrites yet I'm still waiting on you to call out old Donald for his hypocrisy. Please tell me your bubble isn't hiding that from you too? You just said you liked something he tweeted, he has plenty of past tweets that prove his hypocrisy. Maybe check it out when you get a chance.

So more woman are going to come out against Clinton? whoa he is going to be close to that Trump number soon. Maybe they can talk about it. Two presidents who like to prey on women.

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

Actually Hillary Clinton has done a lot for women.

Really???

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...y-gap-n2236085

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.3641170

Yeah, ladies. Don't worry. The dimretards have your six...

https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/...p1#.tuGw1wK26v





Answer.... "Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh."

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Really???

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...y-gap-n2236085

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.3641170

Yeah, ladies. Don't worry. The dimretards have your six...

https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/...p1#.tuGw1wK26v





Answer.... "Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh."

Yes really you moron…

Let’s see:

She was integral in the Violence Against Women Act.

She helped create the DOJ’s Office on Violence Against Women.

She helped create the Office of Global Women’s Issues when she ran the state department.

She started the International Council on Women’s Business Leadership.

She created the US National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security

She pushed for mandates that peace keeping missions protect women and girls from sexual violence during conflicts.

She had a policy of intertwining women’s rights in her policy as Sec of State.

Oh and just for the fun of it, she was the first presidential candidate for a major party in our country.

As to your links. Yeah ladies should know that Republicans will be there for them and their children. So long as they don’t accuse their politicians of anything. They can trust that Republicans all over this country will stand by them. Republicans like Roy Moore. Or this state senator:
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...y-to-child-sex

Oh and other fine Republicans like Bill O’Reilly, Donald Trump, Roger Ailes if he were here. All very prominent Republicans who have had multiple accusations against them. Other fine Republicans who will tell these ladies that they need to get an abortion and then publicly talk about being pro-choice. Fine Republicans who will push anti-LGBT legislation and then Snapchat with men to come meet them. Yeah good luck with having the Republicans behind you.

[gfejunkie]

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

Oh and just for the fun of it, she was the first presidential candidate for a major party in our country.

And, the first one to lose.

[Austin Ellen]

Give me a break - Yes, a ghost rider wrote the book in which OJ put forth a hypothetical description of the murders of Nicole and Ron. In which he accepted $600,000 dollars.
That's a fact and that imply's guilt.

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

Wow you guys are something else. So now words don't matter now either. A person can be caught on tape saying things that prove his predator nature and you say.. well there isn't a picture. You guys need to go tell all those people locked up because they were caught on a wire admitting to a crime that they need to appeal because audio isn't credible, only video/photo evidence. Words are more than enough proof. And if this weren't Trump and it some Democrat caught on tape admitting to something, those words would be all the proof in the world for you. Just admit that you don't want to believe the accusers because you like Trump. That's all it is.

Oh and maybe look up the facts. It wasn't written by OJ. And it was about if he had done it. But that's besides the point. We all have strong feeling that OJ killed someone, yet OJ til this day denies it. Yet you are claiming that because he is denying it, we should put onus on that.

Actually Hillary Clinton has done a lot for women. She is more an advocate for woman than Ivanka Trump who Trump people swear is the champion for women. That's utter bullshit. And again with the hypocrites yet I'm still waiting on you to call out old Donald for his hypocrisy. Please tell me your bubble isn't hiding that from you too? You just said you liked something he tweeted, he has plenty of past tweets that prove his hypocrisy. Maybe check it out when you get a chance.

So more woman are going to come out against Clinton? whoa he is going to be close to that Trump number soon. Maybe they can talk about it. Two presidents who like to prey on women.

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Give me a break - Yes, a ghost rider wrote the book in which OJ put forth a hypothetical description of the murders of Nicole and Ron. In which he accepted $600,000 dollars.
That's a fact and that imply's guilt.

He put forth hypothetical descriptions. But those are just words. Not even audio. Not pictures. And we know that pictures are what matter. How can we take his hypothetical words as guilt? I mean that would be like taking the words of a guy who is on tape talking about kissing women without their permission. That has to imply guilt right?

[Observing]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

No, I'm not. Show me the pic where Trump is groping women-where's the proof? Not just words.
And did you forget that O.J. wrote a book on how he did it?
And yes, I'm partial to Trump - but if you showed me a picture like the one in which Al is in - than yes, I would have a problem with him. But there is no picture because it didn't happen. Or perhaps you know of some other evidence - such as DNA on a blue dress..
Actually, Hillary is one of the biggest hypocrites too (besides being a loser-I loved that tweet by Trump) for her to say she is a champion of women makes me gag.
And Predator Clinton - you are gonna see more women coming out against him - and very soon.

"I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn't get there, and she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's now got the big phony tits and everything."
"I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

DONALD TRUMP

[Austin Ellen]

No, you don't get it. He took the $600,000 dollar payment. He signed off on the book via the payment.

Trump never took a payment as an admission of guilt on anything.

Can I make this any clearer for you?

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

He put forth hypothetical descriptions. But those are just words. Not even audio. Not pictures. And we know that pictures are what matter. How can we take his hypothetical words as guilt? I mean that would be like taking the words of a guy who is on tape talking about kissing women without their permission. That has to imply guilt right?

[Austin Ellen]

Show me the pic?

Originally Posted by Observing

"I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn't get there, and she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she's now got the big phony tits and everything."
"I'm automatically attracted to beautiful [women]—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."

DONALD TRUMP

[Austin Dude]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

No, you don't get it. He took the $600,000 dollar payment. He signed off on the book via the payment.

Trump never took a payment as an admission of guilt on anything.

Can I make this any clearer for you?

Oh ok let's do that then.. Trump paid out money in a lawsuit for defrauding people in the Trump U case. I guess he's guilty of fraud. Oh and he paid out money for discriminating against African Americans. I guess he's guilty of being a bigot. Trump signed off on those things via the payment he made to people making the claims. I mean an innocent person wouldn't make the payments.

Can I make that any clearer for you?

Or will you now say well paying out isn't guilt. Just like words in the form of audio isn't evidence like a picture. Until you want to use words in a book that you said was hypothetical as evidence. Then words matter. Pick one. Either the words someone wrote for OJ in a book are proof of guilt and words matter. Or we just need pictures.

Can I make that any clearer?

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Give me a break - Yes, a ghost rider wrote the book in which OJ put forth a hypothetical description of the murders of Nicole and Ron. In which he accepted $600,000 dollars.
That's a fact and that imply's guilt.

Yes, it is a fact. But it does not imply guilt. If somebody stole the painting of the Mona Lisa and, afterwards, I wrote a book on how one could have gone about stealing the Mona Lisa, would I be guilty of stealing it?

[Austin Ellen]

Trump did not TAKE money as admission of guilt. You are on a different scenario here. Innocent people can be found guilty of fraud if they are listed as the primary owner of a company. They do this because their COMPANY has been found liable and they are held responsible because their NAME is registered with the Secretary of States office as being the OWNER of the COMPANY.

O.J. took money. Read the book. It's clear he did the murders. He signed off on it. He took a payment. He is an individual. He is not a COMPANY.

Can you tell the difference now? Or do you just want to continue with bashing Trump?

Originally Posted by Austin Dude

Oh ok let's do that then.. Trump paid out money in a lawsuit for defrauding people in the Trump U case. I guess he's guilty of fraud. Oh and he paid out money for discriminating against African Americans. I guess he's guilty of being a bigot. Trump signed off on those things via the payment he made to people making the claims. I mean an innocent person wouldn't make the payments.

Can I make that any clearer for you?

Or will you now say well paying out isn't guilt. Just like words in the form of audio isn't evidence like a picture. Until you want to use words in a book that you said was hypothetical as evidence. Then words matter. Pick one. Either the words someone wrote for OJ in a book are proof of guilt and words matter. Or we just need pictures.

Can I make that any clearer?

[Austin Ellen]

Yes, it just imply's guilt. Not that you were found guilty in a court of law. But in OJ's book - he uses the word -I.
So the inference is that he is guilty.

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yes, it is a fact. But it does not imply guilt. If somebody stole the painting of the Mona Lisa and, afterwards, I wrote a book on how one could have gone about stealing the Mona Lisa, would I be guilty of stealing it?