Trump legal going ons

[elghund]

Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

Well hello R.M. my fellow west TX friend

Texans migrating North to Upset? I thought we had laws against illegal immigrants…..


elg…..

[woodywouldpekher]

Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

It’s certainly possible that Cannon gets removed from the case. From what I’ve been reading tho, there doesn’t seem to be very many judges, if any that have experience in this type of case.

All the court needs is a judge with enough "experience" to realize that a 50 ton anchor isn't necessary to hold a 2 man rowboat in place in the middle of a small backyard pond.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by woodywouldpekher

All the court needs is a judge with enough "experience" to realize that a 50 ton anchor isn't necessary to hold a 2 man rowboat in place in the middle of a small backyard pond.

you agree that the Jackass's legal problems are BS ????

[FBSMLUVR]

Originally Posted by elghund

I need to do more research, but from what I have seen no one should have voted for her to be on the Federal bench.

elg…..

I looked it up yesterday, and unless my count is off, that’s what I came up with.

[FBSMLUVR]

Originally Posted by elghund

Texans migrating North to Upset? I thought we had laws against illegal immigrants…..


elg…..

Fuck off lol

[clmc]

Taylor Wilson, USA TODAY Wed, June 26, 2024

The Florida federal judge in charge of former president Donald Trump's classified documents case appears set to allow prosecutors to use documents seized by the FBI from the former president's private club. Trump's legal team has argued that the FBI might have lost its court request for a search warrant if the bureau had disclosed that its officials debated asking Trump's lawyers for permission to search his Mar-a-Lago Club.
But Judge Aileen Cannon indicated at a hearing yesterday that she did not see the significance of such debate. Cannon was skeptical of Trump's argument despite having been criticized by experts for multiple previous Trump friendly rulings that appeared to deviate from legal norms, that included temporarily blocking investigators from examining seized documents before the charges were brought. The decision was reversed by a panel of three Republican appointed appellate judges. Trump nominated Cannon in 2020. Meanwhile, Monica Lewinsky says she hopes Judge Cannon is impeached because she's upset the case still has not moved forward to trial. You can read more with a link in today's show notes.

[FBSMLUVR]

Monica Lewinsky?

She’s now a legal expert?

I understand the article and the concern about Judge Cannon, but wtf does Monica Lewinsky have to do with any of this? She has a Masters Degree in Psychology. Her being quoted in this article only takes away from any validity IMO.

[elghund]

Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

Fuck off lol

elg……

[woodywouldpekher]

Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

Whore Mongers?

We’re now legal experts?

I understand the concern about Judge Cannon, but wtf do Whore Mongers have to do with any of this?

FIFY lol

[elghund]

Originally Posted by FBSMLUVR

Monica Lewinsky?

She’s now a legal expert?

I understand the article and the concern about Judge Cannon, but wtf does Monica Lewinsky have to do with any of this? She has a Masters Degree in Psychology. Her being quoted in this article only takes away from any validity IMO.

Actually, she was the first victim of our current Right/Left divide.

The fuckwad Republicans used, exploited and villainized a young girl for political purposes….they tied to destroy her in their quest to get Clinton.

And, all you left leaning people, don’t think the Democrats wouldn’t do the same thing. They would.

Overcoming what was done to her by Clinton and the GOP, she has made herself eminently knowledgeable to be able to comment on this case. She has a point, and her comments are pertinent.

elg……

[R.M.]

So whats the difference between Paula Jones and Stormy Daniels?

[elghund]

Originally Posted by R.M.

So whats the difference between Paula Jones and Stormy Daniels?

Nothing. They were both exploited for political means.

Clinton never should have been in a position to run anyway based on his history of sexual abuse. Trump never should have been either.

We as a country lost our moral compass decades ago. Just look at what we accept in the process of electing our leaders.


elg…..

[clmc]

[clmc]

[FBSMLUVR]

clmc

Your cartoon posts mean absolutely nothing. The Supreme Court's decision applies too ALL presidents. And truth be known, Biden I'm sure is happy about this decision as well. Oh wait....he took secret documents when he was a Senator...before he was a thoughtful old man with a bad memory. I guess, that's ok tho.

Keep in mind, Senators have to view these documents in a SCIF. And they're not allowed to remove them from said SCIF. Biden did.