Breaking News....Susan "Rat Face" Rice Had Better "Lawyer Up"

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

Keep in mind. Billy Jack had "script approval".

Billy Jack wrote, directed and starred in....same power as Im gonna have over nevergiveitathought!

He is just an extra in my game of life..


.


.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by WTF

Billy Jack wrote, directed and starred in....same power as Im gonna have over nevergiveitathought!


.

I would suggest you instead follow Tom Laughlin's lead in "The Ultimate Gunfighter", that goofy "Western" where they mixed Guns, Swords, and Kung Fu all into one silly plot.

He had all the bases covered. He could kick you silly, cut you to pieces, or blow your head off, all in no more time than it took to say "script approval".

[IIFFOFRDB]

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...b/#more-130878

UPDATE: Susan Rice Confirms Her “Unmasking Requests” Were for President Obama’s Daily Briefing (PDB)…

Posted on April 4, 2017 by sundance

With a general set of narrative ‘talking points’ in hand President Obama’s Former National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, appeared this morning on MSNBC for an interview with Andrea Mitchell. This is the ‘We-Have-To-Respond-phase‘, which necessitates the optic.

Andrea Mitchell is considered a trustworthy ally of the Clinton/Obama political networks; as such, it is not a surprise to see Mitchell selected as the interviewer. Mitchell’s use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.

You already know the routine. MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice. Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas) The full interview is below:



However, that said, there are some interesting aspects to the interview:

Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”

[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.

This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.


Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

Today, Susan Rice defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”….

So under Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB. And who was an Obama Deputy Secretary of Defense?

.


See how that works?


Susan Rice is admitting to “unmasking” names within intelligence reports to give her context for how they pertain to the overall briefing material. That briefing material is the PDB. That PDB goes to dozens of political people and political entities, including former Asst. Deputy of Defense, Evelyn Farkas.

Susan Rice unmasked names for the PDB which was also shared with Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by StandinStraight

Well ya of course Trump and his band of deplorables were unmasked, they are being investigated for treason, unmasking is the least of their problems, they should face a firing squad.

Funny, more and more evidence that Trump was spied upon and still NONE that Russia colluded with Trump.

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/03/un...mp-associates/


This bunch has played right into President Trump's hand. He's holding a straight flush, they have a pair of deuces.

President Trump knew exactly what he was doing on that Saturday morning when he tweeted about President Obama wiretapping him. The Democrats are too stupid to realize it.

There are republican lawyers who will tell you she was doing her job, nothing out of the norm. This just serves as a distraction from Trump's myriad of continually unraveling ties to the Kremlin.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...z&OCID=DELLDHP

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by WTF

Billy Jack wrote, directed and starred in....same power as Im gonna have over nevergiveitathought!

He is just an extra in my game of life..


.


.

Billy Jack had one heck of a round house kick.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Funny, more and more evidence that Trump was spied upon and still NONE that Russia colluded with Trump.

There has been no evidence that Trump was the target of any investigation....

[Prolongus]

So if Susan Rice decides to "lawyer up" and says she has a "story to tell" do you think she she'll ask for immunity??

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by WTF

There has been no evidence that Trump was the target of any investigation....

Exactly right for once, albeit in one of your patented nonsequiturs

susan rice and obama aren't investigators, well of a sort

[silverstate53]

HangEmHigh

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

A Civil War...? If so, "my militia" will be more than happy to hold siege to C N N headquarters till they cry "uncle". Once taken, I'm gonna personally find out if a bulldozer can do donuts in Wolf Blitzer's Situation Room...

the left refuses to accept the results of elections when they don't win

however important it was that hellary go to trump's inauguration, and she deserves credit for that, it didn't make a difference

the left refuses to accept the constitution, for a long time its been so

the left refuses to accept the supreme court when results don't go their way

the left refuses to vote for supreme court justices who follow the law and constitution, all the left has to do is pass a law that meets constitutional muster and should some related matter come before the court, gorsuch will rule accordingly, so why are they against him? because they don't like rulings based on law and the constitution, except their law


when there is no acceptance of one side's rights to speak and act and elect we are in, in essence, a civil war already

when there is no acceptance of half the people's (or more) rights, where does that lead?

its not going to stop, it will only get worse

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by Prolongus

So if Susan Rice decides to "lawyer up" and says she has a "story to tell" do you think she she'll ask for immunity??

She'll probably do a " Lois Lerner " and plead the 5th !

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

the left refuses to accept the results of elections when they don't win

however important it was that hellary go to trump's inauguration, and she deserves credit for that, it didn't make a difference

the left refuses to accept the constitution, for a long time its been so

the left refuses to accept the supreme court when results don't go their way

the left refuses to vote for supreme court justices who follow the law and constitution, all the left has to do is pass a law that meets constitutional muster and should some related matter come before the court, gorsuch will rule accordingly, so why are they against him? because they don't like rulings based on law and the constitution, except their law


when there is no acceptance of one side's rights to speak and act and elect we are in, in essence, a civil war already

when there is no acceptance of half the people's (or more) rights, where does that lead?

its not going to stop, it will only get worse

yes, its a slippery slope to tyranny. like what is happening in Venezeuala.

and maybe Bolivia as that country just recently elected a new president. the results of that race is also contested much like Venezeuala 15 years ago when Chavez was elected.

[Mr MojoRisin]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

That little cunt is nothing but trouble. If this administration wants to set itself apart from all others, especially the last one, some arrests need to be made. Otherwise the Trump administration is just another do nothing bums, just like the last one and all others before it.

Jim

[flghtr65]

Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

If this administration wants to set itself apart from all others, especially the last one, some arrests need to be made.

Jim

She won't get arrested.

A former lawyer for the National Security Council in a Republican administration backed up Rice's claim, telling U.S. News, "it is right, appropriate and legal to ask for U.S. identities in order to understand intelligence in the abstract."
In his experience, which also involved legal work for the State Department, such "unmasking" or "de-minimized" requests from top national security officials happened routinely, almost every couple of days.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...z&OCID=DELLDHP