I just heard this on Hannity, who can fact check it?

[CuteOldGuy]

Dipshit. You haven't proved anything. It's like the lawyer who argued that the defendant definitely committed the crime and said, "And in proof, here is the horse he rode."

In other words, you got nothin'. And neither does the horse you rode in on.

Bush wanted the tax cuts to be permanent. The sunset provision was a compromise.

Gawd, you're an idiot.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Dipshit. You haven't proved anything. It's like the lawyer who argued that the defendant definitely committed the crime and said, "And in proof, here is the horse he rode."

In other words, you got nothin'. And neither does the horse you rode in on.

Bush wanted the tax cuts to be permanent. The sunset provision was a compromise.

Gawd, you're an idiot.

dumbass ...

reconciliation made it mandatory the legislation has a 10 year time limit, there was no damn compromise .. yer dummer' n a fukn rock

go back to KMart and get another law degree ..




http://taxfoundation.org/article/fat...ion-approaches


Denny Crane

[CuteOldGuy]

Ok. This is where it gets fun. Not only do I get to prove that you are the second dumbest poster on here, I get to show you're a liar as well.

You first said that W wanted the tax cuts to expire because he knew it was "good for the country", then you said they had to expire after 10 years due to the reconciliation process. Which is it?

The reason it was part of a reconciliation was because making permanent faced a sure filibuster.

If you're going to lie, you have to be smarter.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Ok. This is where it gets fun. Not only do I get to prove that you are the second dumbest poster on here, I get to show you're a liar as well.

You first said that W wanted the tax cuts to expire because he knew it was "good for the country", then you said they had to expire after 10 years due to the reconciliation process. Which is it?

The reason it was part of a reconciliation was because making permanent faced a sure filibuster.

If you're going to lie, you have to be smarter.

thats not telling a lie, that fishing for idgets in the shallow end of the gene pool .. the sooner you stop flappin your jaws the sooner the hook mark will heal .. you got your reconciliation ignorance shoved up your tired old butt, deal with it.

Denny "Having Fun" Crane

[CuteOldGuy]

You lose. Again. Dumbass.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You lose. Again. Dumbass.

classic

you get your ass handed to you and the preson youre debating is the loser.


COF>>> <<< Facts

[oktome]

I have to say it never ceases to amaze me when I read government debate threads how fing stupid the liberal mindset has become. Basic debate tactics include ad hominem attacks (ie where did you hear that fox news) to the ever popular arguement by dismissal. There really doesn't seem to be any correlation and causation understanding of the most basic topics. Literally if you scoured the net looking for debates such as these you can rarely find intelligent posts by liberals today. Why is that?

I'm sorry to say but the information available on the internet today has become a tragedy. People use information they find. like a drunk uses a lamp post, for support not illumination.

To the facts and I have crunched the numbers. True estimates considering job loss will bring in approx 65-72 billion per year. Considering the rubric of this bullshit arguement of fairness, it does nothing. It is equivalent of a 600 lb person say they are losing weight by cutting out one coke a day. Only worse they add 2 donuts when no one is watching. The real answer rests with spending. I have not heard one solid liberal argument in how raising taxes actually accomplishes anything. It is a feel good mechanism to divert from the real issue that the government is the human equivalent of a 450 credit score.

I detest both parties at this point, but cannot believe how they both have manipulated the American people. Idiocracy was supposed to represent the far off future not modern day.

[cptjohnstone]

good post

[HoustonMilfDebbie]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

He said regarding the Bush Tax Cuts. If they expire, the amount of revenue garnered from the increase in taxes to the Federal Government for one year would operate the Federal Government for just 8 days.

Can that possibly be true?

Yes, especially if Boehner gets his perks!!!

Obama is for the "Average American"...he is not trying to control anything. The Tea Party is the extreme Right Wing that reminds me of "communisism" in every sense of the word!

Are you not just a little mad you couuld not control the elections, this time?

[acp5762]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

He said regarding the Bush Tax Cuts. If they expire, the amount of revenue garnered from the increase in taxes to the Federal Government for one year would operate the Federal Government for just 8 days.

Can that possibly be true?

I would give it 8 hours tops,lol.

[Chica Chaser]

Debbie is pretty adept at sliding in a threAD.
Its working for me....Houston huh?

[oktome]

I hate to pick on a nice looking lady, but this post makes so little sense it hurts. Did you see my post just above on cause and correlation? Obama is for himself, he is a politician. Define "right wing" and communism? Tea party and communism? If you are serious you may want to read a bit.

Originally Posted by HoustonMilfDebbie

Yes, especially if Boehner gets his perks!!!

Obama is for the "Average American"...he is not trying to control anything. The Tea Party is the extreme Right Wing that reminds me of "communisism" in every sense of the word!

Are you not just a little mad you couuld not control the elections, this time?