Wendy Davis Stamp?

[Hardallnight]

Whether I believe their policies or not I would love to have a threesome with Wendy Davis and Sarah Palin and eat their pussies

[General Feuerbacher]

Would that be a tramp stamp?

[Whirlaway]

She couldn't even win Texas women.

[Grace Preston]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

She couldn't even win Texas women.

Correction-- she couldn't win WHITE Texas women. For whatever reason.. when the stats were released, white women were given their own demographic, but women of any other race were not.. so the stats looked like this:

White Women-- 47%.. she won 47% of the white female vote.

Latinos-- Men and women combined-- she won 57% of the vote. Note that both genders are included

African American-- Men and women combined-- she won 93% of the vote. Yet again, both genders combined.


Abbott did not carry women voters in Texas. He carried white women. They didn't bother to include women separately in any other race... because it wouldn't make the numbers look as pretty as they'd like.

[Guest112916]

I will admit. I did not like Ann Richards. I voted for Clayton Williams. I still have the copy of Texas Monthly with Ann & Clayton Dancing Cheek to Cheek.

However, I will say I did like Ann Richards as a governor. If anyone would have become the first female president, Ann Richards would have and I believe would have made a great female president. I met her in Austin and when I shook her hand and apologized to her when I told her how I felt before the election and that if there were ever to be a first female president in my lifetime I hoped it would be her.

But no way I was gonna vote for Wendy Davis. She is hot, can't stop staring at that thing on her chin/cheek though. But she was a puppet this time around because of her antics last year with her filibuster.

[EZ.]

Grace, Single women tend to vote for Democrats while married women vote for Republicans. Wendy Davis might have got 93% of the black vote but they didn't turn out. I heard that he got 45% of the Hispanic vote which is huge compared to national statistics.
In 2008 and 2012 Barack Obama was elected with 73% of the voters being white. The Democratic party has been calling anyone that disagrees with his policies racists. Those racists are the ones that voted him in. The vote on Tuesday was 75% white. The alphabet media has been downplaying what happened. Republicans have the majority in both houses of Congress, the majority of Governors and the majority of the state houses. You have to go back 80 years to have as many Republicans in the House of Representatives. Much of ObamaCare was pushed out beyond the midterms. When people start seeing those effects, they are going to be even more outraged.
.

[Lust4xxxLife]

Originally Posted by GracePreston

Correction-- she couldn't win WHITE Texas women. For whatever reason.. when the stats were released, white women were given their own demographic, but women of any other race were not.. so the stats looked like this:

White Women-- 47%.. she won 47% of the white female vote.

Latinos-- Men and women combined-- she won 57% of the vote. Note that both genders are included

African American-- Men and women combined-- she won 93% of the vote. Yet again, both genders combined.


Abbott did not carry women voters in Texas. He carried white women. They didn't bother to include women separately in any other race... because it wouldn't make the numbers look as pretty as they'd like.

White Texas women tend to be white christian women which tend to vote the way their church and their husbands influence them to vote. Yes, yes, I know that this doesn't apply to all Texas white women but it's my view that it applies to too many. I'd love to be wrong, but I don't think I am.

[EZ.]

Originally Posted by Lust4xxxLife

White Texas women tend to be white christian women which tend to vote the way their church and their husbands influence them to vote. Yes, yes, I know that this doesn't apply to all Texas white women but it's my view that it applies to too many. I'd love to be wrong, but I don't think I am.

Married women, nationally, voted Republican. Is this more of that war on women shit? It is demeaning to women. I have two married daughters and they probably have more influence over their husbands than the other way around. I raised strong women and they can do their own thinking. Married women have more responsibilities. Most pay the bills. Middle class incomes have gone down, they see the rising cost of groceries and the cost of healthcare. People that bought into the Hope and Change crap see the reality. They ask themselves, are you better off today than six years ago?

[rew1256]

Originally Posted by GracePreston

I don't think that NO Democrat can win... but a female divorcee who admitted to have a "GASP" abortion has no chance. She had WAY too much against her to stand a chance. A femme in Texas has got to be ballsy as hell and morally clean as a whistle to stand a chance.

Ann Richards.

[EZ.]

Originally Posted by rew1256

Ann Richards.

Ann was a southern Democrat not to be confused with the "progressives" which are Marxist/Socialists. Texas is right of center and that is far left. I don't care how squeaky clean, that agenda will not fly in Texas or the rest of the country.

[zebra]

I'm going to beat Catbanger to the punch line.

If Wendy will take it in her Ass she will get my Vote.

[Lust4xxxLife]

Originally Posted by OldLRRP

Married women, nationally, voted Republican. Is this more of that war on women shit? It is demeaning to women. I have two married daughters and they probably have more influence over their husbands than the other way around. I raised strong women and they can do their own thinking. Married women have more responsibilities. Most pay the bills. Middle class incomes have gone down, they see the rising cost of groceries and the cost of healthcare. People that bought into the Hope and Change crap see the reality. They ask themselves, are you better off today than six years ago?

There is no question that they are better off than six years ago if you measure it by real estate values, 401k values, number of job opportunities, Gas prices, and/or access to health care. No question.

I notice you didn't mention anything about church. Are they church goers?

[EZ.]

Originally Posted by Lust4xxxLife

There is no question that they are better off than six years ago if you measure it by real estate values, 401k values, number of job opportunities, Gas prices, and/or access to health care. No question.

I notice you didn't mention anything about church. Are they church goers?

Texas never really felt the 2008 recession because we are a red state.

Their 401Ks took a serious hit in 2008 but with the Fed printing billions of dollars, each month, and keeping interest rates at nothing it has propped up the stock market. This is the reason why all of the other commodities have gone up. Want to know what caused the meltdown? read “Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon” This book names names. Some should be in jail.

Job opportunities? America has more people out of work than any time in history. Black unemployment is 11.4%. Recent college grads are looking at 8.5% but an underemployment rate of 16.8% (nearly half are working jobs they could have gotten without the degree). Millions have given up looking for jobs and guess where: blue states.

Gas prices going down? New technology has increased supply. Oil companies are producing on private lands because of this administration.

We actually have fewer people with healthcare than before ObamaCare. Most people get their healthcare through employers. Obviously, if you are unemployed or working part time, you don't get it. Wait until the employer mandate goes into effect. You will see it get much worse.

My daughters aren't Evangelical/Fundamentalist Christians. They were raised Catholic but only one attends.

[TexTushHog]

Originally Posted by OldLRRP

We actually have fewer people with healthcare than before ObamaCare. Most people get their healthcare through employers.

Largely untrue. More are covered now. You may be conflating persons covered versus percent. Yes, the percent was marginally higher in 2008, but the number covered now is higher. Second, current statistics don't cover the surge for the final sign up late last year for the ACA. Plus, the measuring criteria have changed.

See: http://www.gallup.com/poll/168248/un...west-2008.aspx

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...out-obamacare/

[EZ.]

Originally Posted by TexTushHog

Largely untrue. More are covered now. You may be conflating persons covered versus percent. Yes, the percent was marginally higher in 2008, but the number covered now is higher. Second, current statistics don't cover the surge for the final sign up late last year for the ACA. Plus, the measuring criteria have changed.

See: http://www.gallup.com/poll/168248/un...west-2008.aspx

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...out-obamacare/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapoth...overage-gains/