Are you ready of the October surprise?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

My family is rich.

I will put my wealth ... aganist yours any day.

Yours or theirs?

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Proof you cannot read and comprehend.

How on Earth did you ever get your GED?

He can't spell Hillary either.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

He can't spell Hillary either.

The rich and famous don't need to spell ... correctly. They get a pass.

[CuteOldGuy]

Let's see. WDF's brains and his daddy's money against Kayla.

I'm taking Kayla. All the way.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

According to Dick Morris Obama is getting ready to launch the standard October surprise that has become part of the democratic play book. Morris predicts an announcement that Iran will stop trying to enrich uranium giving Obama a foreign policy victory...

Nobody believes the Iranians - even the Iranians.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

....
So, you (bt) spin time in Austin .....

LOL

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

LOL

I saw Austin under his avator, and apparently mistakenly assumed he was "schooling" with the "mullets" up there, but he's fishing for them down here!

Like a lot of "Austinites" ... they are just errr... temporary ...

.... but sounds good on the Liberal Action Group resume.

SDS when I was there....later on, of course.

Still puzzled how BT could be for McCain in 2000, but opposed McCain against Obaminable in 2008 .... was he upset because McCain was a loser?

Oh well, it can't be Lake Austin water either .. he's not up there enough.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

He can't spell Hillary either.

Forgive me....
I do not have wet dreams about her like LL does.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Yours or theirs?

Mine, I do not believe that she is wealthy nor very intelligent. I do not believe anybody that says very bright she is based on her posts. That includes you COCocksucker.

She was talking shit on her wealth and brains. I addressed that issue.

I also addressed her concern for my family's wealth.

They were two seperate issue, from my POV. So, you do not have to be wealthy nor very smart to be ahead of her IMHO and oh btw she raised those issues.

Originally Posted by WTF

So far we have you talking shit on wealth and brains, I will put my wealth and intelligence up aganist yours any day.
.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Mine,

There you go!

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

The October Surprise:

Romney Leads Ohio with 52% !

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ground-in-ohio

(Note To Obamazombies: The PPP poll is weighted +8 for Democrats...do the math, Obama is trailing in Ohio.)

How many votes have been counted, dildo?

We'll see in two weeks what happens.

I fully expect the president to be reelected.

But regardless the outcome, I also fully expect you boyz will keep whining!

and, you lying sack of shit, The Hill's story has POTUS still in the lead.

What a fucking doofus!

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ground-in-ohio

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

There you go!

Being richer or smarter than HatingKayla makes you neither rich nor smart. You seem to have trouble with that concept. Maybe because you think she is rich and smart?

[JD Barleycorn]

Whatzup? You don't know? This cycle they have all been talking about how the polls are weighted. +8 means that they included 8% more democrats in their poll than history warrants. So unless those democrats are voting for Romney (a likely possibility) you are giving Romney a handicap like in golf. So if a poll like this says Romney is 1% behind in reality he is 7% ahead. Now do you understand?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WTF

Being richer or smarter than HatingKayla makes you neither rich nor smart. You seem to have trouble with that concept. Maybe because you think she is rich and smart?

Assuming she is neither rich or smart, I do. Unfortunately for your point of view you have stated you AND your family are rich. I can safely conclude from your obsessive name calling of others within your posts in which you are attempting to belittle their intellectual capacities and/or ability to acquire facts and information and/or their ability to comprehend "concepts" you propose (see above as an example) that you perceive yourself as being intellectuall superior to just about everyone on the board ...

and my observation was, and is, that in my opinion that characteristic is consisent among liberals who regurgitate the philosophy that "government" is more qualified to run people's lives that the people themselves ... like "government" is some special collection of annointed intelligencia that has been blessed by some supreme power with sufficient knowledge, experience, and powers of logic to make better decisions that the taxpayers who pay their friggin salaries and retirement pensions ...

Obaminable comes to mind .. and the list is millions.

In fact the more you post ...

... the more I am beginning to think you work for the post office.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I can safely conclude from your obsessive name calling of others within your posts in which you are attempting to belittle their intellectual capacities...

LL, I can safely conclude from your obsessive (and idiotic) name calling (Obamanible is a prime example) of others within your posts in which you are attempting to belittle their intellectual capacities....

Originally Posted by LexusLover

....and my observation was, and is, that in my opinion that characteristic is consisent among liberals...

....and my observation was, and is, that in my opinion that characteristic is consistent among condescending, Far Right Wing Tea-Nuts who attempt to pass themselves off as Democrats.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bigtex

LL, I can safely conclude from your obsessive (and idiotic) name calling (Obamanible is a classic example) of others within your posts in which you are attempting to belittle their intellectual capacities....

....and my observation was, and is, that in my opinion that characteristic is consistent among condescending, Far Right Wing-Nuts who regularly try to pass themselves off as Democrats.

The prosecution rests.



"I can safely conclude from your obsessive name calling of others within your posts in which you are attempting to belittle their intellectual capacities...

and my observation was, and is, that in my opinion that characteristic is consisent among liberals..."

Now BT....????

Originally Posted by LexusLover
....

I suppose you supported and voted for McGovern then. Since you are "party" guy! He comes to mind because of his death.

Did you support and vote for LBJ?

Kennedy?

Carter?

Connally?

Still trying to get an answer .... BT on whether or not you voted for and/or supported

McGovern?
LBJ?
Kennedy?
Carter?
Connally?

We know you were a "McCain supporter" in 2000, but not in 2008.

BTW: You really shouldn't trash ANYONE who professes to be a Democrat, because regardless of how the upcoming election goes. The Democratic Party is going to need all the members it can muster up between 2012 and 2016 ... especially if your-girl Hillary decides to run in vain. Cuz years ago she was dodging bullets on the tarmac with her daughter in tow and now she has taken one for the boss! Where is Hillary's hubby any way on this issue!!!

Her only hope for 2016 is: Obaminable wins, but what she has factored is that by the end of four more years everyone is going to be so pissed at the Democrats that they won't be able to look at her long enough to spit on her, particularly after her opponents remind the voters of her ... err... history ..... has she ever been elected to anything yet?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

McGovern?
LBJ?
Kennedy?
Carter?
Connally?

We know you were a "McCain supporter" in 2000, but not in 2008.

Why does it matter?

That was then, this is now!