Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163313
Yssup Rider61032
gman4453296
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48678
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42769
CryptKicker37222
The_Waco_Kid37117
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-18-2014, 01:19 AM   #46
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,670
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Now tell everyone what the Ukraine was forced to give up for this "protection".
They weren't "forced" to give up anything. It seemed like a good idea for Ukraine to eliminate its nuclear weapons back in 1994. This rid them of the Russian military personnel needed to operate and maintain them. After Chernobyl the Ukrainians didn't trust nuclear technology anyway. They received economic aid from the US and Russia in return. Furthermore, they knew when they signed it that the memorandum didn't "guarantee" their security since it wasn't a treaty and contained no enforcement provisions. The only way for Ukraine to obtain a military guarantee of their borders/security would have been to join NATO but that wasn't an option.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 01:43 AM   #47
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

So, JD, how SHOULD the US respond to this situation?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 09:08 AM   #48
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,032
Encounters: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
They weren't "forced" to give up anything. It seemed like a good idea for Ukraine to eliminate its nuclear weapons back in 1994. This rid them of the Russian military personnel needed to operate and maintain them. After Chernobyl the Ukrainians didn't trust nuclear technology anyway. They received economic aid from the US and Russia in return. Furthermore, they knew when they signed it that the memorandum didn't "guarantee" their security since it wasn't a treaty and contained no enforcement provisions. The only way for Ukraine to obtain a military guarantee of their borders/security would have been to join NATO but that wasn't an option.
This is a hooker board. People come here to talk about hookers. Get it, LLIdiotJr?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 06:38 PM   #49
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,670
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
This is a hooker board. People come here to talk about hookers. Get it, LLIdiotJr?
Move along, assup, this is the POLITICAL forum so you're clearly out of your league... Go start a thread about drugstores. Put it in the IRRELEVANT/WHO GIVES A FUCK forum.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 03:00 AM   #50
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Considering if I stepped into this mess now after Obama has screwed the pooch, you are right that there is no direct military possibility if I wanted to do that. On a side note I would propose that the house pass a bill creating a 450 ship navy as requested by the CNO. As for Russia, since all the money has been taken back to Russia after Obama telegraphed his intentions we can still apply sanctions. The US has to open the oil and gas wells to supply Europe (and we can make some money at the same time) if Russia cuts them off. We should push to remove Russia from any world body, save the UN, until they change. We are going to have to become more proactive in the Ukraine to reverse the damage that Obama has done. That means money (yep, we're broke, Obama spent it all on this backers), people, and commercial connections. NATO units can go in to act as a trip wire to Russian aggression. The US Navy will have to do freedom of the seas cruises in the Black Sea. Any Russian contract will have to be suspended in the world. Fast track getting Ukraine into NATO and bring back the missile defense shield.
In other words, undue everything Obama has done and act like we have some balls.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 08:01 AM   #51
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

If the Europeans keep on trading and banking with Russia, and don't want your gas and oil you are a screwed pooch. NATO can't go in they are not a member.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 08:32 AM   #52
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Considering if I stepped into this mess now after Obama has screwed the pooch, you are right that there is no direct military possibility if I wanted to do that. On a side note I would propose that the house pass a bill creating a 450 ship navy as requested by the CNO. As for Russia, since all the money has been taken back to Russia after Obama telegraphed his intentions we can still apply sanctions. The US has to open the oil and gas wells to supply Europe (and we can make some money at the same time) if Russia cuts them off. That means money (yep, we're broke, Obama spent it all on this backers), people, and commercial connections. .
You want the US to start shipping our own oil and gas to Europe? You want a bigger Navy? You think we are broke?


Our country is not broke. Hello....wtf do you think all that new oil and gas means. This country is full of natural resources. But unless you work for special interest oil...we do not need to be shipping our oil and gas over to Europe.

You sound like you read Charles Krauthammer. He is a neo-conic shill for intervention all over the world while our own folks here at home go without. If I was in charge people like him would be shot. If you put other countries interest above this country, Firing squad for you.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 08:46 AM   #53
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
You want the US to start shipping our own oil and gas to Europe? You want a bigger Navy? You think we are broke?


Our country is not broke. Hello....wtf do you think all that new oil and gas means. This country is full of natural resources. But unless you work for special interest oil...we do not need to be shipping our oil and gas over to Europe.

You sound like you read Charles Krauthammer. He is a neo-conic shill for intervention all over the world while our own folks here at home go without. If I was in charge people like him would be shot. If you put other countries interest above this country, Firing squad for you.
Excuse me, asshole, but I put Israel's interest above the USA. Should I be shot for that?
In addition, you just criticized Krauthammer for advocating shooting all the foreigners who disagree with the US, but now you are demanding total obedience to our own dictator, you confused exploiter of your illegal workforce. (BTW, I agree we shouldn't be intervening in other countries except for one obvious exception)
Also, why should you get to abuse foreigners who work for you but we can't sell them oil and gas?
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:26 AM   #54
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default You should be shot or forced to give up your citizenship and move to the country whose interest you put above the USofA

Mexico has their own gas and oil dumbass.


Krauthammer does not want to shoot foreigners, he wants to exploit the situation in the interest of oil companies and Defense contractors.

WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:34 AM   #55
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Mexico has their own gas and oil dumbass.


Krauthammer does not want to shoot foreigners, he wants to exploit the situation in the interest of oil companies and Defense contractors.

Everyone knows Mexico has their own oil and gas, dumbass. I guess you equate foreigners with Mexicans?
What about those Mexicans who put the interest of Mexico above the US, and only work here to send money to their home country? Should all Mexicans who put the interest of Mexico above the US be shot or forced to move back?
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:41 AM   #56
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
Everyone knows Mexico has their own oil and gas, dumbass. I guess you equate foreigners with Mexicans?
What about those Mexicans who put the interest of Mexico above the US, and only work here to send money to their home country? Should all Mexicans who put the interest of Mexico above the US be shot or forced to move back?
The aren't citizens you dumbass. If you are a citizen of this country and you put another countries interest above this countries...you have a choice. Shot in the head(which in your case would be your ass) or shipped off to your favorite country.

I don't have a problem with Mexicans working in this country....I have a problem with lazy US citizen not working in this country and blaming it on Mexicans who work harder than our lazy citizens.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 09:49 AM   #57
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post

I don't have a problem with Mexicans working in this country....I have a problem with lazy US citizen not working in this country and blaming it on Mexicans who work harder than our lazy citizens.
Bingo!
Jackie S is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 10:25 AM   #58
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer View Post
Excuse me, asshole, but I put Israel's interest above the USA. Should I be shot for that?
No. Tarred and feathered, then deported would be sufficient.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 11:19 AM   #59
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
The aren't citizens you dumbass. If you are a citizen of this country and you put another countries interest above this countries...you have a choice. Shot in the head(which in your case would be your ass) or shipped off to your favorite country.

I don't have a problem with Mexicans working in this country....I have a problem with lazy US citizen not working in this country and blaming it on Mexicans who work harder than our lazy citizens.
In other words, they won't work for the slave wages that you pay. It is because of exploitative assholes like yourself that I support an increase in the minimum wage to 15 bucks per hour..
OK - so if a person born in Mexico who becomes a US citizen, or if they were born in India or China and become US citizens, if they are more loyal to the country they were born in than the US, you want to shoot them?
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 03-19-2014, 11:22 AM   #60
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
No. Tarred and feathered, then deported would be sufficient.
What about American Indian US citizens who are more loyal to their tribes - deport them, too?
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved