Gun Grabbers listen up

[Yssup Rider]

This proves that 7 out of 8 posters are IFFY!

In fact, so far, 20 of the first 45 posts in this thread are from IFFY.

Please let us know when you're done jerking yourself off, dipshit!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

This proves that 7 out of 8 posters are IFFY!

In fact, so far, 20 of the first 45 posts in this thread are from IFFY.

Please let us know when you're done jerking yourself off, dipshit!

20/45 = 7/8 -stupid pussy

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

20/45 = 7/8 -stupid pussy

At that point, you had posted 7 of 8 consecutive posts in the thread. Now you've posted 6 of the last 8, not counting the ones you deleted.

You wearing a green glove?

[redriverronin]

He through video evidence and highly detailed researched statistics proved that gun control doesn't work. You have proved that you are the king dipshit delusional dumbass of eccie and that is all you will ever prove.

[IIFFOFRDB]

ohaahhha y'all progfrogs really going to get mad now...fuck yaaaa...

[bojulay]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

ohaahhha y'all progfrogs really going to get mad now...fuck yaaaa...

Great stuff, some true Americans speaking there.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by Gotyour6

Also any place guns were banned crime went up.

Most statistics from gun deaths include suicides which make up 90% of the deaths.

Only 1% of crimes are done with what they are banning and again, most are self inflicted gunshot wounds.


The fact is, it doesn't make sense to ban something that looks evil. Most don't even know what they are banning when the bills are introduced. They know the general population of American Idol watchers are all for it because you dont need a hundred rounds of "bullets" to kill bambi.

If you ask the people that protect the ones what they carry you will see that they carry what they are banning. They say that the criminals are out gunning the citizens. Now they are taking away from the people that didn't do anything.

Just because some nut goes on a tangent doesn't justify you disarming me. I want to stop this guy just like the cops do.

Prostitution is not legal because of sex slavery. Are you telling me you are into sex slavery? No? Then lets get behind the bill to make more laws to stop this. Get it?

2010:
Firearm Homicides @11000
Firearm Suicides @ 19000


That's about 65% not 90%.


http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/suicide.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm

[IIFFOFRDB]

[IIFFOFRDB]

I bet that chick could whoop Assup. LOL

[IIFFOFRDB]

I know this chick would bitch slap his punk Assup.

[JD Barleycorn]

Missouri House bill 545.

http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking...ro/HB0545I.HTM

[bojulay]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Missouri House bill 545.

http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking...ro/HB0545I.HTM

Well they asked for it and here it is, a true gun grabbing bill.
It would actually make a person a criminal for being in possession
of a firearm that they legally purchased and had the right to own.

People would be forced to forfeit their legally purchased property
that they paid a great deal of money for or face criminal prosecution.

One of the most basic rights that we have in this country being
turned into a criminal offence.

How generous of them wanting to give you 90 days before you
become a fugitive from justice. Unfreaking believable!!

The war against the Constitution continues.

[Yssup Rider]

Did it pass? Was it signed into law? Was it even sent to committee?

Or is it one of the thousands of bills filed during the session?

Like bills to keep ihorses out of city squares ... Declaring war on Kansas ... Banning 60th trimester abortion ... Putting a surcharge on bus station loitering?

Obviously you have no fucking clue about the legislative process.

[CuteOldGuy]

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Good info here.


Citation

"Gun Control Facts." By James D. Agresti and Reid K. Smith. Just Facts, September 13, 2010. Revised 2/11/13. http://justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp

Finding What You Want

» Click on the footnote numbers for meticulous documentation of each fact.


* Of 1,662 murders committed in New York City during 2003-2005, more than 90% were committed by people with criminal records.[32]

You have these assholes who try to overwhelm you with a mountain of "iffy" data. I found one pile of bullshit in less than 3 minutes. That means there are more.


Just facts? Not hardly.
As a 2nd amendment supporter and ex-NRA member, it pisses me off that the “help” we get is from wack jobs and fringe types. People who oppose background checks (Fed info from checks is stored 3 days), people who insist we need armor piercing ammo, (so many criminals wear body armor), etc. High capacity magazines? Too many out there to even begin to collect them. Plus nothing funnier than watching a moron burn 2, 30 rnd mags through their ARs and then they touch the barrel. Except for watching them burn 4 mags through a rifle which fucks up the lands.

Then we have these guys. I checked one of their facts. Just one. In it they lied and mis-represented the information. Don’t take my word for it. I post links. In this case they posted the link themselves.
Because they know the low-brows won’t read it and if they did they wouldn’t catch the lie. If I extrapolate out their credibility based on that fact using their method of calculating some of their statements, guess where that puts them? That’s right, douche-bag land

Add in the fact that they have made no attempt to correct this bullshit. I remember y’all squealing like little girls when Obama didn’t correct something that had a single printing and wasn’t written by him.. Don’t get me started.

Oh, and jd? There won’t be a test.

First they say:

• Of 1,662 murders committed in New York City during 2003-2005, more than 90% were committed by people with criminal records.[32]

They even add a footnote! From the linked article.





"Five people eliminated a boss; 10 others murdered co-workers. Males who killed favored firearms, while women and girls chose knives as often as guns. More homicides occurred in Brooklyn than in any other borough. More happened on Saturday. And roughly a third are unsolved.

From 2003 through 2005, 1,662 murders were committed in New York. No information, beyond an occasional physical description, is available on the killers in the unsolved cases"

The article clearly states that @1/3 of the murders are unsolved and that they have no real information about the killers.
Just facts says 90% of the killers are criminals when only 90% of 66% are (@63% of the total)
Then they have the balls to put this in:


Many aspects of the gun control issue are best measured and sometimes can only be measured through surveys,[1] but the accuracy of such surveys depends upon respondents providing truthful answers to questions that are sometimes controversial and potentially incriminating.[2] Thus, Just Facts uses such data critically, citing the best-designed surveys we find, detailing their inner workings in our footnotes, and using the most cautious plausible interpretations of the results.

There are many surveys they did not cite. They are selective of supporting info and just like kayla


They have a vagenda.



Here is their footnote.


[32] Article: "New York Killers, and Those Killed, by Numbers." By Jo Craven Mcginty. New York Times, April 28, 2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/ny...homicide.html?...

"From 2003 through 2005, 1,662 murders were committed in New York. ... More than 90 percent of the killers had criminal records; and of those who wound up killed, more than half had them."

Again, no mention of that @550 unknown killers.

I'm sure the rest of their data is fine.

Right, pluck, fuck, and then suck out the duck?