Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
I think we can all safely agree that the top two electioneering strategies are:
The Jan 6th sitcom and infomercial (Marxist show trial)
Abject and unmitigated violence (Domestic Terrorism)
The info from post #34 & #35 above along with the below makes clear their plan for escalating violence , threats and intimidation. Though I find it an odd conundrum that burning down a place that houses pregnant women and children seems like good optics to them, notwithstanding the fact that they are doing so while also advocating for killing infants, aka infanticide. Also, there is that weird contradiction, aka idiocy, that they consider a place that women choose to go to, to choose to carry a baby to term as being Anti-Choice. Too unreal....
Well... there they go again. Aren't they special? Nice little manifesto they got there. Isn't that usually a leading red flag indicator? BTW: link to their manifesto website in included in first line of the below
Quote:
Jane’s Revenge Plans Roe v. Wade Reveal ‘Night of Rage,’ ‘Carrying that Anger Out into the World Expressing it Physically’
The radical pro-abortion group, Jane’s Revenge, is planning more acts of domestic terrorism when the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade is revealed, dubbed a “Night of Rage: An Autonomous Call to Action Against Patriarchal Supremacy.”
The group posted its plans on the Anarchists Library website at the end of May in expectation of the ruling, expected sometime in June.
Here are some excerpts from the manifesto:
This is an event that should inspire rage in millions of people who can get pregnant…and yet, the response thus far has been tepid.
We have agonized over this apparent absence of indignation. Why is it that we are so afraid to unleash hell upon those who are destroying us? Fear of state repression is valid, but this goes deeper than that.
Whatever form your fury takes, the first step is feeling it.
The next step is carrying that anger out into the world and expressing it physically.
Consider this your call to action.
On the night the final ruling is issued——a specific date we cannot yet predict, but we know is arriving imminently——we are asking for courageous hearts to come out after dark.
Whoever you are and wherever you are, we are asking for you to do what you can to make your anger known.
We have selected a time of 8 pm for actions nationwide to begin, but know that this is a general guideline. There may be other considerations involved in planning time and place. We do not claim to speak for every community or crew. We are simply calling out to you. And we hope you answer our cries.
The manifesto says that if there are any “cis males allies” who want to take part, okay, “but Do not police us. Do not tell us what is and isn’t appropriate.”
The manifesto concludes, “To those who work to oppress us: If abortion isn’t safe, you aren’t either. We are everywhere.”
More than 100 Republicans have signed a letter asking Attorney General Merrick Garland to instruct the Department of Justice to investigate this group in relation to attacks on pro-life pregnancy centers across the country as domestic terrorists.
I'm adding the third leg of the stool now. I think we can all safely agree that the top three electioneering strategies are:
Ukraine (It's a Loser)
Abject and unmitigated violence (Domestic Terrorism)
The Jan 6th sitcom and infomercial (Marxist show trial)
I had figured that the plan would be to continue to escalate the effort to drive more fear and panic. Not to mention it's a heck of a swell place to dump a bunch of money we don't have. Besides, everyone loves a battle. Go! Win! Fight! and such or if you prefer a classic:
Boom-Chicka-Boom!, Boom-Chicka-Boom!
Boom-Chicka-Rikka-Chicka-Rickka-Chicka-Boom!
Boom-Shit-a-Rat-Trap, Finger in a Cat-Trap! Boom! Boom!
Cannon-Ball, Cannon_Ball! Siss-Boom-Bah!
Tamaqua High School, Rah! Rah! Rah!
However, it appears the ultimate end game is tossing in the towel. Seems even the Ministry of Truth can can no longer white-wash the inevitable conclusion: Ukraine is lost. Not sure how they are going spin, aka reveal, it just yet. But touching off WWIII may have to wait until World War III starts on November 23, 2023 at 6:05 pm after Russia launches an attack against Germany”. (According to Alexa, allegedly)
BTW: Lots of good links to other articles in the linked article's website
After lying for months, the media are preparing the public for Ukraine’s military collapse.
June 17, 2022|12:01 am
Douglas Macgregor
Diogenes, one of the ancient world’s illustrious philosophers, believed that lies were the currency of politics, and those lies were the ones he sought to expose and debase. To make his point, Diogenes occasionally carried a lit lantern through the streets of Athens in the daylight. If asked why, Diogenes would say he was searching for an honest man.
Finding an honest man today in Washington, D.C., is equally challenging. Diogenes would need a Xenon Searchlight in each hand.
Still, there are brief moments of clarity inside the Washington establishment. Having lied prolifically for months to the American public about the origins and conduct of the war in Ukraine, the media are now preparing the American, British, and other Western publics for Ukraine’s military collapse. It is long overdue.
The Western media did everything in its power to give the Ukrainian defense the appearance of far greater strength than it really possessed. Careful observers noted that the same video clips of Russian tanks under attack were shown repeatedly. Local counterattacks were reported as though they were operational maneuvers.
Russian errors were exaggerated out of all proportion to their significance. Russian losses and the true extent of Ukraine’s own losses were distorted, fabricated, or simply ignored. But conditions on the battlefield changed little over time. Once Ukrainian forces immobilized themselves in static defensive positions inside urban areas and the central Donbas, the Ukrainian position was hopeless. But this development was portrayed as failure by the Russians to gain “their objectives.”
Ground-combat forces that immobilize soldiers in prepared defenses will be identified, targeted, and destroyed from a distance. When persistent overhead intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets, whether manned or unmanned, are linked to precision guided-strike weapons or modern artillery systems informed by accurate targeting data, “holding ground” is fatal to any ground force. This is all the more true in Ukraine, because it was apparent from the first action that Moscow focused on the destruction of Ukrainian forces, not on the occupation of cities or the capture of Ukrainian territory west of the Dnieper River.
The result has been the piecemeal annihilation of Ukrainian forces. Only the episodic infusion of U.S. and allied weapons kept Kiev’s battered legions in the field; legions that are now dying in great numbers thanks to Washington’s proxy war.
Kiev’s war with Moscow is lost. Ukrainian forces are being bled white. Trained replacements do not exist in sufficient numbers to influence the battle, and the situation grows more desperate by the hour. No amount of U.S. and allied military aid or assistance short of direct military intervention by U.S. and NATO ground forces can change this harsh reality.
The problem today is not ceding territory and population to Moscow in Eastern Ukraine that Moscow already controls. The future of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions along with the Donbas is decided. Moscow is also likely to secure Kharkov and Odessa, two cities that are historically Russian and Russian-speaking, as well as the territory that adjoins them. These operations will extend the conflict through the summer. The problem now is how to stop the fighting.
Whether the fighting stops in the early fall will depend on two key factors. The first involves the leadership in Kiev. Will the Zelensky government consent to the Biden program for perpetual conflict with Russia?
If the Biden administration has its way, Kiev will continue to operate as a base for the buildup of new forces poised to threaten Moscow. In practice, this means Kiev must commit national suicide by exposing the Ukrainian heartland west of the Dnieper River to massive, devastating strikes by Russia’s long-range missile and rocket forces.
Of course, these developments are not inevitable. Berlin, Paris, Rome, Budapest, Bucharest, Sofia, Vilnius, Riga, Tallin, and, yes, even Warsaw, do not have to blindly follow Washington’s lead. Europeans, like most Americans, are already peering into the abyss of an all-encompassing economic downturn that Biden’s policies are creating at home. Unlike Americans who must cope with the consequences of Biden’s ill-conceived policies, European governments can opt out of Biden’s perpetual-war plan for Ukraine.
The second factor involves Washington itself. Having poured more than $60 billion or a little more than $18 billion a month in direct or indirect transfers into a Ukrainian state that is now crumbling, the important question is, what happens to millions of Ukrainians in the rest of the country that did not flee? And where will the funds come from to rebuild Ukraine’s shattered society in a developing global economic emergency?
When inflation costs the average American household an extra $460 per month to buy the same goods and services this year as they did last year, it is quite possible that Ukraine could sink quietly beneath the waves like the Titanic without evoking much concern in the American electorate. Experienced politicians know that the American span of attention to matters beyond America’s borders is so short that an admission of defeat in Ukraine would probably have little or no immediate consequences.
However, the effects of repeated strategic failures in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria are cumulative. In the 1980s, General Motors wanted to dictate the kind of automobiles Americans would buy, but American consumers had different ideas. That’s why G.M., which dominated the U.S. market for 77 years, lost its top spot to Toyota. Washington cannot dictate all outcomes, nor can Washington escape accountability for its profligate spending and having ruined American prosperity.
In November, Americans will go to the polls. The election itself will do more than test the integrity of the American electoral process. The election is also likely to ensure that Biden is remembered for his intransigence; his refusal to change course, like Herbert Hoover in 1932. Democrats will recall that their predecessors in the Democratic Party effectively ran against Hoover for more than a half century. Republicans may end up running against Joe Biden for the next 50 years.
The R vs W decision is expected soon. Perhaps as early as tomorrow, June 23, 2022. Time to decorate for the occasion and Jane's Revenge is on it, decorationg trash cans, benches and lamp posts across DC already. I wonder why people think they will start a riot? Well... I guess they have to now. Otherwise it would be false advertising.
I think what the idiots did on Jan. 6th ( entering the Capital, making threats and assaulting law enforcement ) was wrong but how is what they did any different than what Jane's revenge is calling for?
Quote:
The next step is carrying that anger out into the world and expressing it physically.
Isn't that exactly what the Proud Boys and others told their followers? They were wrong and now so is the Left.
Quote:
we are asking for courageous hearts to come out after dark.
Like cowards would do instead of the light of day.
Quote:
Whoever you are and wherever you are, we are asking for you to do what you can to make your anger known.
Again, exactly what the Proud Boys said. How is it possible, that a reasonably sane person can't see both sides and condemn both sides. To not, that would make you a hypocrite. I for one condemn all acts of violence. Call for nothing more than voting out the people you don't like and if you happen to fall within the minority opinion, make a better argument for your cause and if you can't, live with it.
Quote:
The manifesto concludes, “To those who work to oppress us: If abortion isn’t safe, you aren’t either. We are everywhere.”
I've got news for Jane, there are more of us, than there are of you.
I think what the idiots did on Jan. 6th ( entering the Capital, making threats and assaulting law enforcement ) was wrong but how is what they did any different than what Jane's revenge is calling for?...
I'm guessing the key difference is that the Federal law enforcement is not egging Jane's Song and Riot team on from the inside.
Rage on you Crazy Diamond
