Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

RickO'shayRabbitt · 02-01-2010, 11:03 AM

Since I am new, maybe I don't have the requisite experience to answer intelligently. I think I came into this whit a very naive delusion about what this experience might be like.

Based on your definition in the initial post, Lily, I would say that is very close to what I was seeking and what I thought would happen. What I have found, in my very, very limited experience is something which bears no resemblance to what you describe.

What you describe, for comparison purposes, sounds very much like a visit to a five star restaurant, where the food is excellent, but the dining experience surpasses even the food.
What I have experienced thus far more closely resembles a drive thru at Jack-in-the-Box after the bar has closed at 2 am. Cars in front of me, cars behind me, so hurry up and get thru the line, pay your bill, and move on.

Guest020510 · 02-01-2010, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thais

I suspect we are having two monologues with our own assumptions here, as opposed to an actual conversation with another person.

Well: go for it. After all, if I don't like your sentiments, I can simply cut and paste the above. Right?

Thais · 02-01-2010, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nineveh

Well: go for it. After all, if I don't like your sentiments, I can simply cut and paste the above. Right?

I am more confused by your sentiments and don't understand where they came from, than don't like them (although true, I don't like them). Which is why I said "we" rather than "you" in terms of assumptions. Go for it - for what??

sofiaofhouston · 02-01-2010, 11:46 AM

For those who are "allergic" to the term "elitist"...There in lies a great contradiction, for this very forum attracts only those you seem to be allergic to.........

Guest020510 · 02-01-2010, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thais

I am more confused by your sentiments and don't understand where they came from, than don't like them (although true, I don't like them). Which is why I said "we" rather than "you" in terms of assumptions. Go for it - for what??

What is confusing you, Thais?

Thais · 02-01-2010, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston

For those who are "allergic" to the term "elitist"...There in lies a great contradiction, for this very forum attracts only those you seem to be allergic to.........

ASPD was the place I learned about connection, multiple-hour dates, engagement at physical and mental levels, and how to pursue that model. It emphasized that everybody sharing an interest in those concepts was welcome. It was also acknowledged that the title of the forum did not reflect all the unique conversations and contributors.

Right now, I see elitism as a side-dish that could be pushed aside to focus on the content. When I stop seeing it this way, I will be out of here.

Thais · 02-01-2010, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nineveh

Glad to know you extend such courtly benevolence to potentially unelites...Where would I be without your potential sympathy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nineveh

What is confusing you, Thais?

Just count me with the self-serving outsiders, rather than the cool kids who have sympathies to extend.

P.S. Imho, this it turning into a hi-jack... If you want to continue talking, PMs would be better.

WTF · 02-01-2010, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lauren Summerhill

The study by Liza Crihfield is also excellent. She was famed for being the only westerner to live as a geiko, however, they never let her go through the official ceremonies.

Western women can live as Geisha all they want, the Donna want Japanese women. They're white, and a pleasant novelty as entertainers, but they'll never be truly embraced into the shadow world.

If no westerner will ever be accepted or let in... just how are we having a conversation where one knows just what is going on in their world?. Did you read the book? I really ;liked it too.

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_of_a_Geisha[/ame]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thais

ASPD. . .

. . . Right now, I see elitism as a side-dish that could be pushed aside to focus on the content. When I stop seeing it this way, I will be out of here.

What happened to the tried and true model of banning posters that joke with the poor downtrodden elite? I'm confused, have you changed sides?

Marcus Aurelius · 02-01-2010, 01:40 PM

Or another thread because I agree with Thais.

guest051510-1 · 02-01-2010, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camille

If you do some digging into thesis and the like where people have actually done substantial research into courtesans, you will find that a courtesan is a woman who wishes to maintain a lifestyle to which she has become accustomed, not create such a lifestyle. That is why so many self-proclaimed courtesans are dismissed, regardless of how successful they may be at securing the trappings of wealth. You would be maintaining a the kind of privileged life you were born into. Women who traditionally became courtesans were those with brothers who would inherit the wealth upon the parents death and who did not wish to marry to secure their wealth.

C

OK, I'm curious about this post. Camille please explain if you could. I was born into money. My first car when I was 16 was a Porsche, I had my own personal maid and my own driver as well as my nannies. When I became a young woman, I married a man that had money. When we divorced, after 9 years of marriage and two children I let him keep 90% of the estate even though I was entitle to half because I didn't want his money, I had my own. I was never as wealthy as my father, at my peek I was only worth a couple of million - pennies compared to the empire I came from. But, I have also hit rock bottom and at one point was next to homeless living on food stamps. And guess what, my only brother inherited the bulk of my father's estate. Yet all this does not and would not entitle me to be called a Courtesan, it is a title I would have to earn IMO.

WTF · 02-01-2010, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius

Or another thread because I agree with Thais.

It would be nice if you and Thais would let us in on just what you agree on. So far all I have seen is "On one hand" followed by "On the other hand".

ps...Niv , do as you wish but I got zero out of the pm route in another place and time.

Guest012211-3 · 02-01-2010, 02:07 PM

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtesan[/ame]

Does anyone have a time machine?

Exotic Lily · 02-01-2010, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barneyrubble

Based on your definition in the initial post, Lily, I would say that is very close to what I was seeking and what I thought would happen. What I have found, in my very, very limited experience is something which bears no resemblance to what you describe.

If a gentlemen chooses a Courtesan by gaining valuable information from her website, which express most of the wonderful qualities i've mentioned, he would never fail. However, most men choose by sexual stimulation instead of mental stimulation... and it is what it is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sofiaofhouston

For those who are "allergic" to the term "elitist"...There in lies a great contradiction, for this very forum attracts only those you seem to be allergic to.........

And that is why I frequent the General Discussion Board so I won't be deemed a hypocrite.

WTF · 02-01-2010, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicole Preston

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtesan

Does anyone have a time machine?

Why Yes I Do.

WTF · 02-01-2010, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicolette Bordeauxva

Yet all this does not and would not entitle me to be called a Courtesan, it is a title I would have to earn IMO.

Nic, I think the key word is ''maintaining''.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camille

. You would be maintaining a the kind of priveleged life you were born into.

C