Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Read post 16 paragraph two. Technically only the Senate has the trial. The House made the case. Nothing about this was going to be fair.
For those who knew how it would play out, aside from Pelosi holding on to the articles, we had already accepted it. When all is said and done, to summarize what actually happened is not misrepresenting factual information nor making shit up. The only loose screws were in the Senate. Other than Romney. More, and new, information to come to a better decision is not a waste of time. Coverup.
The so called Articles of Impeachment weren't even impeachable offenses. The Senate isn't able to remove a sitting president from office when the information presented to them isn't substantiated by the Constitution. The Senate did their job. Romney is an idiot and just jealous of Trump. If Obama had the enemies Trump has not only would he be impeached and removed from office but he would have been sent off to Gitmo. Joe Biden is probably the main reason why that never happened, lol.
The so called Articles of Impeachment weren't even impeachable offenses. The Senate isn't able to remove a sitting president from office when the information presented to them isn't substantiated by the Constitution. The Senate did their job. Romney is an idiot and just jealous of Trump. If Obama had the enemies Trump has not only would he be impeached and removed from office but he would have been sent off to Gitmo. Joe Biden is probably the main reason why that never happened, lol.
"So-called"? You think they weren't real? Oh, weren't impeachable. Well. They both were. The Republican Senators just didn't have the balls to face the public if witnesses were called. That's why Romney is the only respectable one.
Quote:
The Senate turned its back on the truth. On a fair trial. On doing what the founding fathers would have wanted us to do.
But Democrats walked out of the Senate chamber with their heads held high. Because we sought the truth. We did everything we could to get the truth. The American people beleive that, and knew we were fighting for the truth. And know it to this day.
I'm very proud of my caucus. Every member voted his or her conscience. Every member cared about the fumdamental here - what I tried to talk about in my speech. The truth. The facts.
It was a day, a week - two weeks. Where the crucible of the nation was tested. A lot of people, including a Republican, passed the test. A lot of Republicans, leader McConnell, failed that test. Failed to live up. What this country is all about. Failed to live up to getting the truth.
Early in the process we defined what a fair trial was. Witnesses. Documents. We didn't know what the witnesses would say. We didn't try to have a long list of witnesses to be dilatory. We simply looked to the ones who were eyewitness to the account, and what they would say.
And now that our Republican colleagues have rejected a fair trial, truth is a giant asterisk next to the president's acquittal. The asterisk says "he was acquitted without facts. He was acquitted without a fair trial." And it means that his acquittal is virtually valueless.
So while leader McConnell may be cheering this as a win, history will view this as a Pyrrick victory.
"So-called"? You think they weren't real? Oh, weren't impeachable. Well. They both were. The Republican Senators just didn't have the balls to face the public if witnesses were called. That's why Romney is the only respectable one.
you mean two faced mitteats? okay ...
so go ahead and praise a two-faced fucktard like Mitteats as some virtuous hero of conscience
"So-called"? You think they weren't real? Oh, weren't impeachable. Well. They both were. The Republican Senators just didn't have the balls to face the public if witnesses were called. That's why Romney is the only respectable one.
It was all bullshit. The same kind of bullshit that was evident during the Kavenaugh hearings. They put the guy through all kinds of hell over fabricated allocations and he was still confirmed. Trump was put through the wringer and he wasn't removed from office. It's unacceptable to wheel your will through hatred and that's what the Democrats have done through out this whole administration.
It was all bullshit. The same kind of bullshit that was evident during the Kavenaugh hearings. They put the guy through all kinds of hell over fabricated allocations and he was still confirmed. Trump was put through the wringer and he wasn't removed from office. It's unacceptable to wheel your will through hatred and that's what the Democrats have done through out this whole administration.
It's not hate. It's called vetting. And it's perfectly acceptable.
It's not hate. It's called vetting. And it's perfectly acceptable.
vetting eh? for the sake of argument let's say Ford deliberately fabricated her story. is that vetting or perjury under oath? there is only one correct answer here.
Now,now - best to deal with your "reality" before commenting on others. Tell me - do you see other Candians in the room with you? Or do you feel the need to speak "Candian" when you are around other people? Let's start with that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoeHummer
Trumpholians can’t handles the truth or reality.
They have gone so far to the shit end of the stick, they forgot what real wood feels like.
Except for a couple, who routinely take wood up he bum, eh?
vetting eh? for the sake of argument let's say Ford deliberately fabricated her story. is that vetting or perjury under oath? there is only one correct answer here.
When dealing with hypotheticals, there are many answers.
Let's assume she told the truth. Is there a belligerent and alcoholic rapist sitting on the SCOTUS? There is only one answer here.
When dealing with hypotheticals, there are many answers.
Let's assume she told the truth. Is there a belligerent and alcoholic rapist sitting on the SCOTUS? There is only one answer here.
I take it your unwillimg to bet.
let me give you a lesson in probability .. there is a 50/50 probability that Ford lied. can you admit that the assumption that Ford lied is equally likely that she didn't?
