Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 278
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163220
Yssup Rider60924
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42569
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid36980
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2012, 03:24 AM   #46
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Please link to the articles he wrote in the Harvard Law Review, WDF.
Can you not understand the written word? My point was that some of you nuts now think he was not President of Harvard Law Review.Just like some think he was not born in this country, you know birthers.... I said nothing about how many articles he wrote....WTF is wrong with you. You gone senile?
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 06:55 AM   #47
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
I think the largest scam in history is the war on poverty started under LBJ. Over 17 trillion dollars transfered from those that made to those that need it. We have more people living in poverty than we did back in 1967. Imagaine, $17 trillion and I got was this lousy T-shirt (and the bill).


By the way, here is the link to a 1990 New York Times article that says Harvard Law Review presidents ARE NOT chosen by their grades. They are chosen as part of a popularity contest it seems. Grades are part of it, other things (like race) are another part of it. Seems that women and other minorites got elected before the first black person at Harvard. What a liberal bunch.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/06/us...anted=2&src=pm
So the president of Harvard Law Review is chosen by a popularity contest. We've been told over and over again that being president of Harvard Law Review is proof positive of Obama's great intelligence. I don't remember any Dimo's pointing out that it was just a popularity contest.

This is just another indication that Obama is a fraud, an imposter. I still want to see his transcripts. His poor writing skills are not consistant with graduating manga cum laude from Harvard Law, unless they grade based on popularity.

Unfortunately, politics is essentially a popularity contest. More often than not, the more likeable candidate beats the more competent candidate. If Obama beats Romney, it will probably be because people thought he was a cool guy.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 07:12 AM   #48
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
That was my point, Joe. He didn't write anything. An editor of a law review, with no writing. That is extremely rare. Normally it is the quality of your writing that gets a person on the editorial board. To become the editor after having written nothing of significance (case comments are the easy way out) is very strange.

Imagine. The smartest person to ever graduate Harvard Law School never wrote anything of any substance. Amazing.
I just wanted to be completely accurate about Obama's role at Harvard Law Review. Technically, his contribution wasn't nothing; it was almost nothing.

JD says that Obama was chosen for president of Harvard Law Review by a popularity contest. If that's the case, he was more of a mascot than a functioning writer or editor. Why would you let someone, chosen by popularity, edit the work of people chosen for their knowledge of the law? Popularity over excellence is certainly a terrible way to chose a president of a law review, or a country.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 07:42 AM   #49
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

It's like saying "He was a Homecoming King, I'll be he'd be a good president."
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 08:24 AM   #50
Seedy
Valued Poster
 
Seedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 23, 2010
Location: houston texas
Posts: 10,174
Encounters: 38
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman View Post
It figures. You have nothing so you demand something. You feel entitled. OK then. Suck my dick while you apologize for your failings as a human being.



What a loser. When iifuckoff is done, take your turn.
Yo, fuckwad, if I want any lip from you, I'll scrape it off my zipper.....
Seedy is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 08:25 AM   #51
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

To be completely honest, minus the snarkiness, the president of the Harvard Law Review is based on many things. In the 70s (according to the NYT article) presidents were chosen by their grade point average. In the 80s and beyond other intangibles became part of the process. This was done to allow minority and female candidates. Seems they couldn't make the cut on just grades. So your writing ability played a part, your subclass (race, sex, etc), your personal popularity, and anything else that could sway your fellow classmates. The important point to take away is just because Obama got elected it was not about grades. So the argument that Obama must have been brilliant is a bogus argument according to the NYT.
The president is expected to publish a major article to be published in the Review every month. That means there should be no less than 12 articles authored by Barack Obama. There is one that is acknowledged and that one seems to be embargoed. Comments on the article published in the early 90s have not been complementary. So that is what we have to work with...a description of a shadow and we can't see the real object.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 08:32 AM   #52
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seedman55 View Post
Yo, fuckwad, if I want any lip from you, I'll scrape it off my zipper.....
Now I remember why I put munchmasterbater on ignore. What a creep.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 08:40 AM   #53
joe bloe
Valued Poster
 
joe bloe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 10, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,740
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
To be completely honest, minus the snarkiness, the president of the Harvard Law Review is based on many things. In the 70s (according to the NYT article) presidents were chosen by their grade point average. In the 80s and beyond other intangibles became part of the process. This was done to allow minority and female candidates. Seems they couldn't make the cut on just grades. So your writing ability played a part, your subclass (race, sex, etc), your personal popularity, and anything else that could sway your fellow classmates. The important point to take away is just because Obama got elected it was not about grades. So the argument that Obama must have been brilliant is a bogus argument according to the NYT.
The president is expected to publish a major article to be published in the Review every month. That means there should be no less than 12 articles authored by Barack Obama. There is one that is acknowledged and that one seems to be embargoed. Comments on the article published in the early 90s have not been complementary. So that is what we have to work with...a description of a shadow and we can't see the real object.
We never get the straight truth about anything in Obama's past. All his personal history is shrouded in mystery, half truths, lies and sealed records. This guy is an imposter. Obama can not be trusted. If the complete truth is ever told about Obama, I believe people will be shocked, even the Dimos. This guy makes Frank Abagnale ("Catch Me If You Can") seem like an amatuer.
joe bloe is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 12:18 PM   #54
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe bloe View Post
We never get the straight truth about anything in Obama's past. All his personal history is shrouded in mystery, half truths, lies and sealed records. This guy is an imposter. Obama can not be trusted. If the complete truth is ever told about Obama, I believe people will be shocked, even the Dimos. This guy makes Frank Abagnale ("Catch Me If You Can") seem like an amatuer.
The same was said about George Bush by the far far left. Ya'll sound that idiotic
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 12:57 PM   #55
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Are you saying, WDF, that since we failed to learn some things about George W. Bush's past, we are therefore precluded from inquiring about President Obama's past? Even if those items may be directly relevant as to how President Obama desires to govern?
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved