They're coming (and they said it would never happen)

[CJ7]

OK then, its not ANY politician.


correct ... hes the ONLY politician to place a Permanent Ban on guns

[CuteOldGuy]

But not all guns, is that right, CBJ7? Which ones were banned, and which ones were allowed? Simple question. Why are you avoiding it?

[CJ7]

it matters what guns to a constitutionalist such as yourself?

[CuteOldGuy]

Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know.

some 18 or 19 different models that fit the definition of assault weapons ... specifically, I cant name them all ..

the 94 legislation excluded any assault weapons and clips made before 1994, and kept them legal to own .. to the best of my knowledge, those are now included in the 04 legislation Romney passed and are now illegal.

[CuteOldGuy]

How is Romney's ban different from what Clinton passed, and what Obama will likely pass?

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

How is Romney's ban different from what Clinton passed, and what Obama will likely pass?

willards ban was PERMANENT (the 94 laws had a sunset clause) and included weapons that the 94 legislation didnt


why are you asking stupid questions that Ive already answered?

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Just asking, CBJ7. If you don't know, you don't know.

That never stopped you from blurting out a StupidOldFart response to a question that you know absolutely nothing about!

Originally Posted by CJ7

why are you asking stupid questions that Ive already answered?

Perhaps it is because he is a StupidOldFart!

[JD Barleycorn]

Okay this should be simple. What Romney passed only affected Massachusetts which does not have 2nd amendment protection on the state level. What Obama will be trying to do runs completely counter to the US Constutition which he swear an oath to protect.

[CJ7]

Massachusetts is exempt from the constitution?


and you carry a handgun to class ?


well, teach ... youre dismissed.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Okay this should be simple.

Ut oh, that should eliminate JD, StupidOldFart, I B Lying&Crying, Whirly and Joe the Bloehard from the conversation.

Next topic?

[Little Stevie]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Stevie, stevie, stevie... The Brady Bill brought us the instant background check. The Assault Weapon Ban was another bill. Ronald Reagan was supporting the Brady Bill three years (check the date) before the AWB was passed. No assault weapon was used the day that Reagan and Brady were shot. It was a .22 caliber revolver. When the AWB was signed the house, the senate, and the White House were controlled by democrats. You know the party that tried to disarm black people with weapon bans in the 1860s, 1870s, and 1880s. It makes it too hard for the white democrat racist to lynch an innocent black person if they have guns.

Idiot! The articles were clearly about TWO SEPARATE BILLS, both of which REAGAN SUPPORTED!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

...Massachusetts which does not have 2nd amendment protection on the state level. What Obama will be trying to do runs completely counter to the US Constutition which he swear an oath to protect.

uh.... the 2nd amendment applies to the State via the 14th amendment ...

McDonald v. Chicago, 561 US 3025 (2010)

[CuteOldGuy]

So what if the bills have a sunset clause. It is still a ban. And, CBJ7, you still haven't told me how Romney's bill is different from what has been law, and what is being proposed.

Besides, couldn't the Massachusetts legislature reverse the ban at any time? Then it wasn't permanent.

Gawd, it's such a simple question.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Gawd, it's such a simple question.

As I clearly stated earlier, that eliminates you!

Please pay closer attention!