Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

SA Angel · 01-29-2015, 08:27 PM

Do I think you capable of it based on what I have seen?

No.

Do I think it's a poor choice for this venue?

Yes.

To put it in perspective, it the equivalent of me using a gif of the scene in "Rent" where Mimi and Roger find out that each other has AIDS and holding hands with the caption "True Romance". It's just not a great choice if the audience is familiar with the reference.

Stella Dearborn · 01-29-2015, 09:04 PM

Damn, where is the humor? It's funny! It's the "I'm the shit" move, pointing at yourself in the mirror while getting it on. Yes, the movie was graphic but even IT was made with a comedic tone. Lighten up- and back to the subject of hot, pulled together women, please! If you're not throwing your hat in the ring it just sounds like you're trolling.

Stella Dearborn · 01-29-2015, 09:08 PM

And the AIDS reference was REALLY uncalled for. Thanks for your input, has left me all warm and fuzzy this evening...

Guest062217 · 01-30-2015, 07:22 AM

Thank you Stella.....you're definitely a 1%-er xoxo......Meanwhile back on topic and not allowing the other provider whom I would never see derail this....

I just wanted to say thank you very much. I am definitely a very luck man. I've had the pleasure of meeting some absolutely wonderful ladies in my travels.

Many of you (and you know who you are) have turned into great friends who I care for very much...so thank you for being so much fun, classy, intelligent, sexy and just being you!

Every provider is a girl...but fewer are a "woman"...which is what I love and appreciate...

Xoxo
SNL...

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNL9933

Mods - If I have posted in the wrong forum - sorry.

I am spending way too much time searching through showcases, P411 and Eros looking for upscale providers with decent reviews. I know it's part of being a hobbyist but it's difficult looking for a specific type of provider.

I stay in the $300 to $500 ph.

Here's the wish list:

-Upscale Incall residence or 3/4 star hotel (no motels)
-Age range: 35 to 50
-Hair color
-Body type: Fit, Curvy or Rubenesque (no BBW's)
-Ethnicity: Caucasian, AA,
-No tattoos (or very few)
-DD+
-Classy courtesan type
-FS, PSE, GFE, BI-SEXUAL, DOUBLES, FEMALE CONDOM FRIENDLY,
-BBBJ only... (no CBJ providers)
-Pics must be clear and accurate. If I find the pictures are not accurate I will probably not go forward with the session.

Thank you

Old-T · 01-30-2015, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stella Dearborn

Damn, where is the humor? It's funny! It's the "I'm the shit" move, pointing at yourself in the mirror while getting it on. Yes, the movie was graphic but even IT was made with a comedic tone. Lighten up- and back to the subject of hot, pulled together women, please! If you're not throwing your hat in the ring it just sounds like you're trolling.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stella Dearborn

And the AIDS reference was REALLY uncalled for. Thanks for your input, has left me all warm and fuzzy this evening...

Stella, I suggest you go back and look at these two posts of yours with an objective set of eyes if you can.

In one you scold Angel for finding the gif offensive.

In the other you turn around and find her HIV reference offensive.

Sorry, but it cuts both ways. Neither you nor anyone else is the perfect purveyor of what is or is not offensive. "Funny" often looks very different to others.

But the most ridiculous part of your post is implying that she is "trolling". Suggest you read a lot more of someone's posting history before tossing out snide comments.

Guest062217 · 01-30-2015, 09:06 AM

T - I think what SD was conveying was that she wasn't putting her hat in the ring and admittedly did not fit the criteria which made it 'appear' to or sound like trolling...

Roxane · 01-30-2015, 09:11 AM

But the most ridiculous part of your post is implying that she is "trolling". Suggest you read a lot more of someone's posting history before tossing out snide comments.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the advice. I'd have to say yes, she trolls, based on her posting history. And if you find something offensive but don't believe it means what you worry you think it might mean though acknowledging you don't believe it means that...well by all means troll on. Smh.

You can't be everyone's type. If SNL contacts you then doesn't book it's because he decided your looks didn't match up to the personality or you claimed to be more than you are. Just because you contact someone doesn't mean you're obligated to book with them. Js. Some men here crave more than just a body type.

I can understand your frustration SNL. Happy hunting though. You know I adore you.

Stella Dearborn · 01-30-2015, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

Stella, I suggest you go back and look at these two posts of yours with an objective set of eyes if you can.

In one you scold Angel for finding the gif offensive.

In the other you turn around and find her HIV reference offensive.

Sorry, but it cuts both ways. Neither you nor anyone else is the perfect purveyor of what is or is not offensive. "Funny" often looks very different to others.

But the most ridiculous part of your post is implying that she is "trolling". Suggest you read a lot more of someone's posting history before tossing out snide comments.

With an objective eye- as in fact based? Or subjective - as in based on my opinion? I was reading an interesting thread and (in my SUBJECTIVE opinion) someone took it off topic to throw in her offensive and unsolicited opinion of someone's gif- wtf? I (after using my OBJECTIVE eye and thoroughly rereading my posts) still think that she is in fact- trolling. The avatar was funny, unobtrusive, the depiction she provided was crude and unnecessary. You know- in my SUBJECTIVE OPINION. Maybe she can act out "train spotting" for us next?

Old T- Thank you for busting out your "big words".

Stella Dearborn · 01-30-2015, 11:06 AM

And now, technically I have helped derail this thread as well. The subject is interesting and useful, we should return to it. Xo

Old-T · 01-30-2015, 02:46 PM

SNL, tried to send a reply to the PM you sent me, but your mailbox is full.

Old-T · 01-30-2015, 03:51 PM

Stella (and Roxan),

I am sure you would like it to work that way. You get to lob a few barbs and then decree “Time’s up! No backsies!” That was Roller Derby and tag in grade school recess.

I am sorry you seem to have gotten your feelings hurt—that is rarely my intent, I typically assume one can disagree on here without getting insulting—however since you clearly feel the need to escalate the hostilities then I feel obliged to defend myself.

I have never met Angel, or you, or Roxane, or SNL. And since my travels rarely take me to Houston I suspect I am unlikely to meet any of you three ladies. However I am familiar with SNL’s posts and Angel’s posts—at least a lot of what they both write—and I consider both of them generally well spoken, interesting, and worth reading.

Conversely, going by Roxane’s and your posts on this thread both of you come across as attack dogs. I didn’t remember either one of you ever posting in here (the entire D&T section) before, and a quick search seemed to confirm that. So without too much brainpower the obvious question that pops to mind is “why would two ladies from Houston all of a sudden jump into this particular discussion?” Obviously I don’t know if it is true or not, but the initial though that comes to mind is maybe you two have a less than pleasant history with Angel and decided to let it spill over on here. I can think of other reasons you both instantly appeared, but that seems the most plausible one. Yes, attack dogs seems to fit, even upon further review. You a haughty one, Roxane a quick to judge one since she only joined Eccie this month.

But back to the original point you made without yet comprehending what you were saying:

--People are supposed to refrain from criticizing a gif because YOU think it is humorous and acceptable,

--Yet people are also supposed to criticize a movie reference as unacceptable because YOU find it objectionable.

And you see nothing disingenuous (look there! A "big word") about that? Why, might I ask? I neither approved nor disapproved of either so don’t waste your time trying that tactic. Personally I don’t find either particularly humorous, nor do I find either unduly offensive.

Moving on to your next two points, it is nice of you to string together forty words or so that have little to do with the issue of “trolling” and then sound like you somehow defended your statement. Actually, you didn’t. It comes across as “Why, but, well, and then, moreover, and so yes, she is trolling.” The data shows she has made far more substantive, contributing posts on D&T, as well as on the Main forum than you and Roxane combined. That does not prove or even imply that you two are more troll-like, but months of seeing her posts I saw no posts on those boards that were thinly veiled ads or self-promoting posts. Thus to me your “trolling” comment comes across as another hollow gripe and once more makes me wonder your actual reason for showing up on this particular thread.

Lastly—just a small piece of advice if you are trying to portray yourself as a high priced lady (which you may well be): don't tell people that you think my previous post was littered with “big words”. That does not say a lot for your vocabulary level. There was nary a "big" word in that entire post.

Oh, and before I forget (that is almost a fib, I was nowhere near forgetting), we have this comment by Roxane

“You can't be everyone's type. If SNL contacts you then doesn't book it's because he decided your looks didn't match up to the personality or you claimed to be more than you are. Just because you contact someone doesn't mean you're obligated to book with them. Js. Some men here crave more than just a body type.”

I actually agree with the comment—everyone has different likes—but don’t you find it amazingly odd for that comment to come out of nowhere (I was about to say it was a non sequitur but I am trying very hard not to litter this post with "big words" for you)? Do you see any precursor (OK, maybe some would think that a “big word”, but actually I don’t) to that comment in the entire thread? I didn’t see one. Did you? If so, please educate me where it was—I may have missed it. No, what is SEEMS to be is the final piece of evidence that neither you nor Roxan came to this thread “accidentally”. That you are a two-person hunting pack with an agenda.

NOW if you wish to get back to the original topic, I for one would be happy to.

Roxane · 01-30-2015, 05:03 PM

My opinion is the girl who commented is trolling. I have no idea who she is or care. I only glanced at her post as someone suggested. Rest assured i don't get my feelings hurt because someone doesn't agree with me. So no apology is needed. You assume too much. And miss quite a lot. But I just don't have any need to inform you on where your guesses fell short. Or direct you to the comment my comment was directed to.
SNL I really enjoyed lunch with you yesterday and I think you're the bees knees. Promise I'll stay in touch and not go M.I.A. again. Now hopefully people can let your thread get back on topic.

Guest062217 · 01-30-2015, 05:26 PM

^^^thanks sweetie......it was so good to see you as well....you're the cat's meow for sure...muah.

If anyone cares to GET BACK ON THE TOPIC....by all means I'd love to hear from you...

Thanks...

Charleze Reina · 02-12-2015, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNL9933

Mods - If I have posted in the wrong forum - sorry.

I am spending way too much time searching through showcases, P411 and Eros looking for upscale providers with decent reviews. I know it's part of being a hobbyist but it's difficult looking for a specific type of provider.

I travel often and I would like to find a couple ATF's in each city I travel to.
Am I asking too much here?

I can spend $300 to $500 ph.

Here's the wish list:

-Upscale Incall residence or 3/4 star hotel (no motels)
-No upsell
-Age range: 25 to 50
-Hair color
-Body type: Fit, Curvy or Rubenesque (no BBW's)
-Ethnicity: Caucasian, AA, Latin or Mixed
-No tattoos (or very few)
-Non smoker
-DD+
-Classy courtesan type
-FS, PSE, GFE, BI-SEXUAL, DOUBLES, FEMALE CONDOM FRIENDLY,
-BBBJ only... (no CBJ providers)
-Pics must be clear and accurate. If I find the pictures are not accurate I will probably not go forward with the session.

Thank you

Hello
SORRY YOU ARE having a hard time finding the right upscale companion. I just realized your post is old but if you're still looking, my website has more info. http://glamorousgwengushes.gfefiles.com/

Kelly512 · 02-18-2015, 06:10 AM

I agree about wanting to find an upscale provider.
When I see some of the girls in person I'm like eww...I can't believe we both get paid for this lol. Either way I've said this a hundred different ways, go CBJ all the way. Why any man would put his penis near any lady of the night uncovered is beyond me lol.
I guess some people still live in the 70s before they had proper health and sexual education.
Its 2015, wrap it up or die for a few hundred bucks? No thanks. I'm worth more. Also this isn't EBay :-P If you like it, then go for it. Also if you find a provider you like, then just stick with her don't get greedy.

Cheers