Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockydoc
The OP has the right to request a thread to be closed.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginger Doll
Quote:
Originally Posted by arealone
And don't hijack my thread. In the OP and within my rights have requested it be closed.
|
Then don’t hijack my status.
Thank you, babe.
Appreciate ya. 
|
A few points of order to help clarify some issues.
The OP absolutely has the right to request his thread be closed.
Quote:
#21 - ECCIE Staff will go to great lengths to avoid editing, deleting, or censoring our members posts or threads...unless absolutely necessary. Forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will be removed from public view. Controversial, troublesome, or objectionable posts may draw staff attention or in some cases disciplinary action, but the offending post will not be removed from the view of our membership in any but the most extreme cases. Often times you will find directions, footnotes, or other guidance from staff edited INTO posts which draw our attention. These are for the purpose of educating the readers of what is and what is not acceptable as well as informing others about how these issues have been dealt with. Members are encouraged to RTM posts which include rule infractions or objectionable material if it appears that staff has not already become involved with the thread or post in particular.
Note: Staff will consider a request from the original poster to remove a thread/post they have made provided it was recently posted and not replied to. As a general rule, staff will not consider such requests once a thread or post has been visible for at least 4 hours or received 2 or more replies. In these cases, a request from the OP to lock the thread is more appropriate and will receive consideration.
|
The request to close or lock this thread has received consideration by more than one Member of Staff. The Staff Members found that the parameters of your discussion have been discussed and individual posts have been replied to. It has almost completely been on subject.
As to the accusations of the Thread being Hijacked. A number of Staff Members have reviewed the reported posts and each has been dealt with IAW the Eccie Guidelines. As noted in the above paragraph, the thread has been almost completely on subject/topic.
As to the Ginger's claimed status being Hijacked. The claim as posted is not factual. While it is true that Ginger Doll is the Most Reviewed "Active" Eccie Provider, another Eccie Provider account has many more posted reviews. A suggestion to resolve this argument would be to amend your Signature line to read #1 reviewed Active Eccie provider in the country". This statement is factual and cannot be disputed unless another Provider surpasses the Number of Reviews posted for Ginger Doll.
