Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70795
biomed163280
Yssup Rider61003
gman4453295
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48665
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42682
CryptKicker37220
The_Waco_Kid37069
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2022, 03:27 PM   #31
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
What part do you not believe Levalex?

Do you not think someone went in and shot up a bunch of children? Do you think the parents were crisis actors and the children didn’t exist? Do you believe that the children weren’t actually killed?

What part was a hoax or what part of the narrative shouldn’t be believed.
It doesn't matter what I or anyone else believes, that's of minor importance. What's of major fucking importance is a Journalist like Alex Jones can put out information he believes through his own observation and research to be true without fear of repercussion.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 04:01 PM   #32
myeviltwin
Gaining Momentum
 
Join Date: Nov 12, 2011
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 64
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
a Journalist like Alex Jones can put out information he believes through his own observation and research to be true without fear of repercussion.
Apparently you did not pay any attention whatsoever to the trial. The main reason that he lost the suit and the plaintiffs were awarded such high damages is because he KNEW that what he was spreading was BS, and he was stating it as if it were fact. Alex Jones is not a victim, as much as he will continue to act like he is, just like his orange fuhrer.
myeviltwin is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 04:39 PM   #33
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myeviltwin View Post
Apparently you did not pay any attention whatsoever to the trial. The main reason that he lost the suit and the plaintiffs were awarded such high damages is because he KNEW that what he was spreading was BS, and he was stating it as if it were fact. Alex Jones is not a victim, as much as he will continue to act like he is, just like his orange fuhrer.
He's not the first journalist to do that.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 05:12 PM   #34
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,065
Encounters: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
It doesn't matter what I or anyone else believes, that's of minor importance. What's of major fucking importance is a Journalist like Alex Jones can put out information he believes through his own observation and research to be true without fear of repercussion.
Bullshit.

Anyway I presented to you some simple questions. You can’t answer them apparently.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 05:19 PM   #35
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,069
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
This.....

Waco, you're fucking up comparing Connecticut to Texas.

Just send Alex more money and he then might be able to pay it off. Take it from your burgeoning 401k!

not directly comparing Connecticut to Texas. i merely noted Texas does have statues limiting civil damages. his judgment in Texas was about 50 million but legal EXPERTS in that article state by Texas statues he'll probably only be liable for about 10 percent, about 5 million.

i also said it's unlikely Connecticut has similar statues. a quick googie search didn't bring up anything conclusive and since i don't care i didn't waste more time on it.


as i recall it's G Bushy II that Jones has to thank for that statue limiting civil damages in Texas.


imagine that. bahahahaaaaa


i also say this 965 million judgement won't hold up. it will get significantly reduced, most of the time they do. and it might not "wipe Jones out" either, no matter how much it is when it's all said and done. some types of investments can't be touched for civil judgements. case in point. OJ Simpson. he also famously got hit with a huge civil judgement for something like 40 million by the Goldman family. they never got a dime, not even his Heisman i don't think. OJ still has about 3 million dollars and it can't be touched. he put about 3 million in an Actor's guild pension fund back when he took up acting after football and was still loaded big time. to him at the time it was just a small investment, now it's still letting him be a millionaire.


Jones has had years as these cases were going through all the usual legal hoops. does anyone here think he hasn't been hiding his money? legally or otherwise? if the dude sent the bulk of anywhere between 100 - 270 million depending on who's numbers you believe he's really worth, he'll still be rich no matter what. btw fellow posters it IS legal to put money in offshore accounts (not reporting it to the IRS notwithstanding).


and this judgement will be a Pyrrhic victory. just like the Juice.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 07:49 PM   #36
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

All this banter about Jonseys money and how he can hide it or avoid paying cum dodges the most important point...what he said and did was wrong and as previously pointed out, he knew it was wrong while he did it...he is NOT a journalist, he is a propagandist and by admitting he new what he spread was false, a liar. Wake up and smell the fucking roses, there are many more like him...hate to bust any bubbles but Kennedy is dead in the Real World....
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 08:26 PM   #37
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Bullshit.

Anyway I presented to you some simple questions. You can’t answer them apparently.
You apparently don't understand the 1st Amendment. It's the only Amendment that protects the Media. Alex Jones is a member of the Media even if he isn't of a Main Stream Media outlet.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 09:41 PM   #38
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,065
Encounters: 41
Default

Still haven’t answered the questions.

I suspect you don’t understand the 1st amendment or it’s limitations.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 09:58 PM   #39
Lucas McCain
Valued Poster
 
Lucas McCain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 7, 2010
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 10,667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
You apparently don't understand the 1st Amendment. It's the only Amendment that protects the Media. Alex Jones is a member of the Media even if he isn't of a Main Stream Media outlet.
Maybe you should explain the 1st amendment to his lawyers. I'm sure they never thought about that as a legal defense.

Some of you guys are too fucking funny. LOL
Lucas McCain is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 10:27 PM   #40
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Still haven’t answered the questions.

I suspect you don’t understand the 1st amendment or it’s limitations.
What's your big itching question.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2022, 10:31 PM   #41
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas McCain View Post
Maybe you should explain the 1st amendment to his lawyers. I'm sure they never thought about that as a legal defense.

Some of you guys are too fucking funny. LOL
Well they better start filing law suits because Alex Jones isn't the only journalist that has doubts about Sandy Hook.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2022, 12:20 PM   #42
reddog1951
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2010
Location: mo
Posts: 1,550
Encounters: 3
Default

Jones's statements were ruled defamatory and therefore not covered by the 1st. He admitted as such himself.
reddog1951 is offline   Quote
Old 10-17-2022, 11:22 AM   #43
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,914
Encounters: 46
Default

eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Old 10-17-2022, 11:30 AM   #44
Levianon17
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500 View Post
I don't get this Robbie Parker.He appears more broken up over this defamation trial than he did ten years ago when his child was killed.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 10-17-2022, 11:43 AM   #45
eccieuser9500
Valued Poster
 
eccieuser9500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 29, 2013
Location: Milky Way
Posts: 10,914
Encounters: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levianon17 View Post
I don't get this Robbie Parker.He appears more broken up over this defamation trial than he did ten years ago when his child was killed.

How so? Would you explain? Please.
eccieuser9500 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved