Why aren't you angry?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by ekim008

Pimp mobile I can you never watch the news.you are excused if this is all the knowledge you have go sit in the corner..

Did you get that from Sesame Street?

It might help if you would start listening to the news rather than just watching it.

And to really get a grip on reality start LISTENING to a variety of sources and some actual sworn testimony before Congressional hearings rather than blogs and shrill campaign rhetoric.

"Pimp mobile" ... juvenile.

[i'va biggen]

Car of choice for pimps and drug dealers.Apparently you are the one lacking of news not knowing where the safe house and quick response team was...

[steamyromance]

Please gentleman, lets approach the issue from this angle...
1. Who reads this forum that thinks its safe in Libya, today, or before the attacks ?
And i mean safe enough to take my family there.. If you thought it was safe there then guess what, you are dummer than a box of rocks.
2. Security was cut BY the administration so there would be a lower profile, or security was cut because it was deemed not necessary ( it had nothing to do with budgets )
either scenario for weak security was fuckin bad.
3. The question is who was responsible for the decision , thats the only thing i want to know.
4. What penalty does the decision maker or policy maker pay for screwing up so bad.
5. Ask yourself this , do i need a CIA spook to tell me " hey shits bad here in Libya " FUCKIN NATIVES ARE RESTLESS " if they didnt already know that then we are really fucked...

[I B Hankering]

REP. JASON CHAFFETZ: "Look at the statements after the attack. You had Jay Carney, the White House spokesperson. You had the ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice. You have the State Department comments coming out. 

Now we come out to find that those were absolutely not true. They are somewhere between totally false and absolutely not true. . . . And when President Obama was asked directly on "The View" and on other situations, he led people to believe there was a video.

 Remember, we have a document that we . . . is now out there in the media, 230 security interests -- attacks and other threats against Western interests. Our facility there in Benghazi was bombed twice prior to this.

 How can you -- coming up on 9/11. We're in Libya. It's been bombed twice. The British ambassador there in Benghazi, an assassination attempt -- then we're led to believe that there was no reason to believe that we were under threat there in Benghazi?

 We have people testifying today that is not the case. When that intelligence information comes forward, it doesn't go just to the State Department. It also goes to the White House.

 That's why we have a National Security Council. So for the White House to claim ignorance on this is absolutely, totally not true."