Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!
FIND GIRLS
Shemales
HOT SEARCH
REGISTER
REPORT TRAFFICKING
Image Scrapbook
PAY FOR PREMIUM ACCESS
DISCOUNTED BANNER SUBSCRIPTIONS
SEARCH
M.ECCIE.NET

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
Reload this Page The Tea Party Is Dead. Long Live the Tea Party.
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 373
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 267
George Spelvin 255
sharkman29 253
Top Posters
DallasRain70506
biomed161205
Yssup Rider60189
gman4453069
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47860
pyramider46370
bambino40490
CryptKicker37112
Mokoa36487
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35624
Mojojo33117

Reply
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2012, 01:19 PM   #31
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Again,

Was the 2010 mid term election an ass kicking for the Democrats ?
sure ... why do you need to ask? everyone knows how obvious that was.


do you need to be reminded the republicans lost seats in the senate AND the house last month, trending DOWN?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 01:20 PM   #32
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
It's AssWipe. He doesn't know his own head from his ass. He doesn't know Liston from Frazier, he doesn't know a spoof on the news from the real news !

AssWipe is clueless.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 01:21 PM   #33
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
Your right; the 2010 election was an ass kicking. It caused a tremendous shift in the power structure in state and federal government. The 2012 Obama win was NOT an ass kicking. The power arrangement in Washington was unchanged by Obama's re-election.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7 View Post
sure ... why do you need to ask? everyone knows how obvious that was.


do you need to be reminded the republicans lost seats in the senate AND the house last month, trending DOWN?
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 01:27 PM   #34
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
Your right; the 2010 election was an ass kicking. It caused a tremendous shift in the power structure in state and federal government. The 2012 Obama win was NOT an ass kicking. The power arrangement in Washington was unchanged by Obama's re-election.
ass kicking or not matters not ... as they say in Tennessee.

since the power structure/arrangment in Washington was unchanged (from the republicans standpoint) what are you whining about
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:08 PM   #35
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
I am NOT whining; just pointing out that when nitwits like MarxNoSmarts claim November 2012 was an ass kicking, he is wrong.

Don't make life so difficult for your self CJ....accept that you are always one or two steps behind us.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:11 PM   #36
markroxny
Valued Poster
 
markroxny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 4, 2012
Location: Harlem
Posts: 1,614
Encounters: 3
Default
2012 was an asskicking on the presidential level. It's a fact.

What the republican party was offering on the national level was rejected. Now you can accept that or not. Doesn't change the facts.

The public had an option to change from Obama and didn't. Period.
markroxny is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:16 PM   #37
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
I am NOT whining; just pointing out that when nitwits like MarxNoSmarts claim November 2012 was an ass kicking, he is wrong.

Don't make life so difficult for your self CJ....accept that you are always one or two steps behind us.

as soon as you admit you are one trick pony
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:20 PM   #38
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
No it wasn't. Historically it wasn't even close to be an blowout.

In 1992 and 1996, Bill Clinton won with 370 electoral college votes and 379 electoral college votes, respectively. But those were relatively close electoral college stats compared to George H.W Bush's 426 electoral votes in 1988, and Ronald Reagan's 525 in 1984. In that election, Reagan narrowly beat out his 489 electoral votes in 1980. Dwight Eisenhower cruised with 442 and 457 electoral votes in 1952 and 1956.

The Obama 332 to 206 electoral college vote doesn't measure up to being a blow out. And his 51% to 47% popular vote was a squeaker of a win.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:23 PM   #39
Jackie S
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,845
Encounters: 15
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by markroxny View Post
2012 was an asskicking on the presidential level. It's a fact.

What the republican party was offering on the national level was rejected. Now you can accept that or not. Doesn't change the facts.

The public had an option to change from Obama and didn't. Period.
One of the great Democrats of our era was Tip O'Neill. The famous phrase he coined is why the Tea Party is not dead.

"All Politics are Local"

That is why the Republicans, ie Conservatives, will maintain controle over The House, and probably gain some Senate Seats in the 2014 mid terms.

The very voters that returned President Obama to the Whitehouse don't even realize that the true power, ie, the power to controle the purse strings, resides in The House. That is where nthe Tea Party will spend it's capitol, and that is where they will win.
Jackie S is online now   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:23 PM   #40
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
No it wasn't. Historically it wasn't even close to be an blowout.

In 1992 and 1996, Bill Clinton won with 370 electoral college votes and 379 electoral college votes, respectively. But those were relatively close electoral college stats compared to George H.W Bush's 426 electoral votes in 1988, and Ronald Reagan's 525 in 1984. In that election, Reagan narrowly beat out his 489 electoral votes in 1980. Dwight Eisenhower cruised with 442 and 457 electoral votes in 1952 and 1956.

The Obama 332 to 206 electoral college vote doesn't measure up to being a blow out. And his 51% to 47% popular vote was a squeaker of a win.

and at the end of the day this matters how?
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:27 PM   #41
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
No surprise you think history is useless. Just an illustration of what an electoral college blow out looks like....not the imaginary Obama 2012 "ass kicking."
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:48 PM   #42
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
No surprise you think history is useless. Just an illustration of what an electoral college blow out looks like....not the imaginary Obama 2012 "ass kicking."
so as usual youre splitting hairs, in this case, between a win and an asskicking ..

dont look now but the republicans are literally getting their ass kicked all over the congressional floor after a SLIGHT win by the dems
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:50 PM   #43
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
You make zero sense.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:52 PM   #44
CJ7
Valued Poster
 
CJ7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
You make zero sense.

LOL

then yu better tune in Rush and pay closer attention to Coulter while youre at it
CJ7 is offline   Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 03:03 PM   #45
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default
Again, you make zero sense. You bring up Rush and Coulter to prove your clarity of thought ???
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Reply
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved

Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Forum Guidelines - Top