Oath Keepers

[lostincypress]

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

It is Article 1 Section 8 ................not 2.

And the reality of your hypothetical would have so many constitutional issues swirling around that it is impossible to say what the prevailing facts would be in (legal or illegal) order to put down said "insurrection."

It would have to work it's way thru the courts and SCOTUS before anyone can say such an order would be legal and constitutional. Are you psychic to know how some unknown SCOTUS would rule ?

At that point I don't think anyone would give a shit what 9 people in robes had to say.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

All good now. and i won't bill you either.

Thanks, There is this other matter, though...LOL

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Thanks, There is this other matter, though...LOL

well come now sport. spill the beans! inquiring hooktards want to know!

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

well come now sport. spill the beans! inquiring hooktards want to know!

I'm good but our brothers will need you when the Jack Boots show up.

[Whirlaway]

You are probably right.

Originally Posted by lostincypress

At that point I don't think anyone would give a shit what 9 people in robes had to say.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

I'm good

Not according to Hanoi COG. He says his ATF IIFFY's "Sweet Ass" is "Sweet."

His words, not mine!