Arrest in Tarentum

[bambino]

Originally Posted by dj8rocks

No computer access at the moment, I’ll try to answer.

The first part of your question about posting a discussion about “hey look at the article in XYZ”. That is perfectly ok because there is no direct link on this board to the article that has a persons RL info posted. The members would have to hunt down the article themselves using other resources.

If it’s a general link discussing an amp bust with no clients names in the report, not much chance of exposing a members identity.

The mandate to edit links has been in place for a few years. I’m quite sure I’ve missed some here and there since I was assigned to the PA forums on 9-2018.

The main thing to remember is to ask this question. If I post this link, COULD it in any way be tied back to a member here? As y’all know, there are multiple hundreds of lurkers and people who don’t actively participate on the boards.

All it would take would be one RTM and a member saying that link has my RL name on it. Of course, we would ask a few questions in an attempt to validate the claim.

The point here is that I was simply trying to inform the members of the possible consequences of posting an actual arrest link. Once it’s posted, the OP has no control over what the other members may or may not say in subsequent comments or RTM’s.

Pretty straight forward.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by dj8rocks

No computer access at the moment, I’ll try to answer.

The first part of your question about posting a discussion about “hey look at the article in XYZ”. That is perfectly ok because there is no direct link on this board to the article that has a persons RL info posted. The members would have to hunt down the article themselves using other resources.

If it’s a general link discussing an amp bust with no clients names in the report, not much chance of exposing a members identity.

The mandate to edit links has been in place for a few years. I’m quite sure I’ve missed some here and there since I was assigned to the PA forums on 9-2018.

The main thing to remember is to ask this question. If I post this link, COULD it in any way be tied back to a member here? As y’all know, there are multiple hundreds of lurkers and people who don’t actively participate on the boards.

All it would take would be one RTM and a member saying that link has my RL name on it. Of course, we would ask a few questions in an attempt to validate the claim.

The point here is that I was simply trying to inform the members of the possible consequences of posting an actual arrest link. Once it’s posted, the OP has no control over what the other members may or may not say in subsequent comments or RTM’s.

Thanks for the detailed explanation. That is helpful

[eyecu2]

Thanks DJ8. Were glad for the detail and all!

[dj8rocks]

Most welcome. Here to assist in any way I can, feel free to reach out anytime with any questions on any board matters.

[Lexxxy]

That's really unfortunate and sad. We're turning into a country where women can't have male friends or go out to eat/drink alone anymore. The witch hunts are on again.

[bambino]

I really don’t feel the Fosta/Senna laws have hindered the hobby. What I do feel is the degradation of the hobby that’s been going on for years. The “hobby” is still around and isn’t going anywhere. Not too vibrant in a Pgh. But there is SA. That’s where it’s happening.

[Lexxxy]

Originally Posted by bambino

I really don’t feel the Fosta/Senna laws have hindered the hobby. What I do feel is the degradation of the hobby that’s been going on for years. The “hobby” is still around and isn’t going anywhere. Not too vibrant in a Pgh. But there is SA. That’s where it’s happening.

30% of my dates this trip are sa actually. 50% regulars through p411, indys, and eccie. The other 20% are twitter, switter, and tryst. Be careful with sa just like anywhere else. I've seen alerts and know a girl that walked into a place and their date is local le or fbi. A girl made a post saying they went through her phone, wrote some things down, and let her go because there was no evidence of her being trafficked. An sa guy also got arrested and they had him use his phone to set up dates with girls he's seen before.

[obnoxiousram]

I have always been skeptical about SA. Now I know why. I actually need to lay low in hobbying right now. I have been fortunate who I have found when I finally made up for lost time. Eccie keeps me safe needless to say.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by obnoxiousram

I have always been skeptical about SA. Now I know why. I actually need to lay low in hobbying right now. I have been fortunate who I have found when I finally made up for lost time. Eccie keeps me safe needless to say.

How does ECCIE keep you safe? No site keeps you safe. It’s ones responsibility to keep themselves safe. The provider that got busted in this thread was a popular Indy’s provider. She inquired about joining here. Looks like she never did. You never know.

[Dreamgurrl]

If I am not mistaken, Eccie requires providers to submit RL info including photo ID. Maybe that’s why she never completed her membership.

This woman’s bail is 15k. That is ridiculous. I will be putting a decent amount on her books, as I’m quite certain she doesn’t have many that would do this for her.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

This woman’s bail is 15k. That is ridiculous. I will be putting a decent amount on her books, as I’m quite certain she doesn’t have many that would do this for her.

Pimping ain't easy

[dj8rocks]

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

If I am not mistaken, Eccie requires providers to submit RL info including photo ID. Maybe that’s why she never completed her membership.

No RL info required, only a photo ID with everything covered/masked except the date of birth.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by dj8rocks

No RL info required, only a photo ID with everything covered/masked except the date of birth.

Correct. Less than DG wants for screening. But then again, I don’t think ECCIE ever extorted anyone.

[tannana]

Originally Posted by obnoxiousram

Eccie keeps me safe needless to say.

How you do that math? I mean, the ECCIE folks have been resilient as hell but the vast majority of what keeps you safe is between your ears.

Originally Posted by Dreamgurrl

This woman’s bail is 15k. That is ridiculous.

So, it's actually not straight bail. 10% of that. $1500. If she paid someone to bond her out, she'd be out $750 to the bondsman. She pays it herself, she'd get it back if she shows for court. The individual in question has both priors and an open restitution amount with the court both of which are probably why the raw number is 15k but the MDJ likely allowed the percentage due to the nature of the offense.

[Gabrielle]

Originally Posted by tannana

The individual in question has both priors and an open restitution amount with the court both of which are probably why the raw number is 15k

None of this was listed in the article. So...why ya digging to find sex workers personal real life info?
You know your stalkerish ways are why I broke up with you, right?

A Sex Workers personal life info is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS.



Now if anyone would like to contribute (as tannana suggested before lol) to the folks who are gonna try to bail her out...my DM box is open. Also when she gets out, she will have needs without a way to produce income...so y'all can donate to that as well. Bills...food...transportation. ..health care...etc.

Now...let's move this convo back to the COPS Googled the phone number and found REVIEWS and arrested her. REVIEWS ARE EVIDENCE.

Still insist on writing that review that will make you look like a porn star? Cause in all my years...I've had less than a dozen that were 100% accurate.

Like you fucked for an hour and made me cum how many times? Damn I wish I was there!