Low Volume Provider

[ErectionDemolitionSpclst]

Originally Posted by tbone2u

I need to make sure I am keeping up with this thread. So FG.....it's ok to call the ladies bitches? That pretty much sums up how I see you refer to them in other threads but I would like to advise you it's probably not in your best interest to continue to refer to the ladies as bitches. As far as the "code"......you didn't share ALL your magic code phrases with us so maybe the guy above was just pulling your leg...so to speak.

Dear Mister Gentleman ECCIElonian tbone2u,

Oh my golly gee, I'm not a man, I swearrrrr! But with the right make-up and prosthetics, I could sooooo play one on T.V. - Ahahahahahahaha!

Love & Light,

Mary Magdalene

[82Vinny]

Wrote in my own answer:
3-4 gentlemen/ month. I have a job; I consider this a hobby, too . It keeps it fun for me.

Yes Indeed, and agreed

[Fast Gunn]

@ the bone.

Why is that those least qualified to give advice are the first to do?

I already have you on ignore hoping you would take the hint, but you keep yammering.

. . . I would suggest that you first work on basic gender identification before you try to lecture me on conduct.

Originally Posted by ErectionDemolitionSpclst

Dear Mister Gentleman ECCIElonian tbone2u,

Oh my golly gee, I'm not a man, I swearrrrr! But with the right make-up and prosthetics, I could sooooo play one on T.V. - Ahahahahahahaha!

Love & Light,

Mary Magdalene

[tbone2u]

Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

@ the bone.

Why is that those least qualified to give advice are the first to do?

I already have you on ignore hoping you would take the hint, but you keep yammering.

. . . I would suggest that you first work on basic gender identification before you try to lecture me on conduct.

What makes you think I am the least qualified?? I don't refer to the ladies as "bitches" like you do in so many of your threads. Your problem is Narcissism and you will remain this way the rest of your life.

[Exotic Beauty]

I like this thread.I guess I can now understand the pros and cons and the views and opinions of the replies of "Low Volume" as I have posted myself in this category due to having a Monday-Friday class and a part time job. I rarely travel so when I do I stay longer and pace out dates.One day may be one gent and a multi hour or full day date. If I was to be on a travel also I have just paced out like a Morning and then maybe a eve gent at an hour each. I do not like to stack dates.I am pretty non rushed and have not mastered the 30 min. sessions at all.

On a normal no travel week I am home based and exclusive with P411 so I basically post in ad boards there and let the gents give me a day ahead notice for a Incall or Outcall date and make that my only one for that day.

On my variety menu I also pace out and never stack. So I am not sure the Non-rushed,no stacking and one date per day or travel dates being one in a day or one early and one late a "Low volume" if I am wrong I may need to say I am a "Non rushed Companion" etc. and re define "Low Volume" due to very awesome replies One thing for sure is there will never be a gent having to pass with another and feel like they are in a "assembly line". Guess the variety of having a class,part time jobs,cam shows at random and travels very limited this is helping me to better learn what I may need to explain of myself.

Thanks for reading and thanks for the OP since I really read this thread and want to make sure in all my years with Hobby,Eccie and P411 I do not confuse any gents by my postings.
~Exotic Beauty~

[zerodahero]

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

what if she "REFUSES"?

But I got the "joke".

[OBringer]

I too think a provider is doing this as her second job when I see "low volume". I also think I'll have better luck pre-booking her, since she may not be very accessible.

Then again, I also get cynical and think that "low volume" is a soft sell for "hurry and book me while you can because I am not available very much." And truthfully, we'll never know. I don't care how high volume a provider is so long as I don't feel my session is rushed and she makes me feel like I am the center of her universe during our time together.

Now...Exotic Beauty brought up "date stacking"...definitely a bad thing, and I appreciate that she doesn't so that! I saw one K-girl in L.A. who obviously was seeing alot of gents. When I did DATY, I could tell from how hollow she was that someone must have seen her just before I got there, lol. I won't return to someone who makes me feel like I am on the assembly line.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Exotic Beauty

I like this thread.I guess I can now understand the pros and cons and the views and opinions of the replies of "Low Volume" as I have posted myself in this category due to having a Monday-Friday class and a part time job. I rarely travel so when I do I stay longer and pace out dates.One day may be one gent and a multi hour or full day date. If I was to be on a travel also I have just paced out like a Morning and then maybe a eve gent at an hour each. I do not like to stack dates.I am pretty non rushed and have not mastered the 30 min. sessions at all.

On a normal no travel week I am home based and exclusive with P411 so I basically post in ad boards there and let the gents give me a day ahead notice for a Incall or Outcall date and make that my only one for that day.

On my variety menu I also pace out and never stack. So I am not sure the Non-rushed,no stacking and one date per day or travel dates being one in a day or one early and one late a "Low volume" if I am wrong I may need to say I am a "Non rushed Companion" etc. and re define "Low Volume" due to very awesome replies One thing for sure is there will never be a gent having to pass with another and feel like they are in a "assembly line". Guess the variety of having a class,part time jobs,cam shows at random and travels very limited this is helping me to better learn what I may need to explain of myself.

Thanks for reading and thanks for the OP since I really read this thread and want to make sure in all my years with Hobby,Eccie and P411 I do not confuse any gents by my postings.
~Exotic Beauty~

Dear lady, do not feel obliged to change how you describe yourself. There really is no "official" definition. "Low volume" is very much like "New & Improved", or "World Famous". If you provide a no-rush enjoyable personal touch date for some luck guys, it is none of their business if you saw some one 8 hours before or 8 days before. Never let any guy convince you otherwise.

[canuckvic]

Is that the amount of cum she's swallowed before I add to her protein level?

[Fast Gunn]

Okay.

Do you hear that?

. . . That's the bullshit meter red lining the engine!

Originally Posted by Old-T

Dear lady, do not feel obliged to change how you describe yourself. There really is no "official" definition. "Low volume" is very much like "New & Improved", or "World Famous". If you provide a no-rush enjoyable personal touch date for some luck guys, it is none of their business if you saw some one 8 hours before or 8 days before. Never let any guy convince you otherwise.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by Fast Gunn

Okay.

Do you hear that?

. . . That's the bullshit meter red lining the engine!

FastGunn,

I am getting the sense that you don’t take very well to opinions that might be different than your own. A bit defensive and closed minded in other words.

My post was bullshit???

If you are going to throw down that gauntlet I’m going to ask you to elaborate. Tell me, what part of what I said fits your description of BS? Specifically.

Was it: “do not feel obliged to change how you describe yourself”? If you think that is BS, then you must think a lady should change her description of herself to please you. Why should she be obligated to change how she describes herself? Is there anything wrong with how she describes herself? Speak up man! Be specific!

If that isn’t the part you object to, what about: “There really is no "official" definition. "Low volume" is very much like "New & Improved", or "World Famous".” If THAT is the part you think is BS, then that means you believe there IS an official definition for these terms. Not YOUR personal definition—unless you are saying we need to all follow you as the beacon of true definitions—but a generally accepted definition. I think your own poll shows there is not.

So then about the only part you could remotely object to is: “it is none of their business if you saw some one 8 hours before or 8 days before.”If you have an appointment to see a lady at 6 PM do you really ask her, “Hey, did you have an appointment this morning?” Do you think it’s fine for her to ask you, “Hey Gunn, how many women have you slept with in the past 48hrs? In the past week?” If you are paying for her company from 6 to 8 PM, what she did that morning—or the day before or the week before—is none of your business. Why do YOU think it is?

I expect dumb, ego driven comments when I dip my toes into the Political Forum. In this forum I don't, and I try to be well behaved. You made a very unsubstantiated, ill defined, and wrong accusation about my post so now I am calling you out to explain just what you meant.

[pyramider]

Why are you surprised?

[Old-T]

Not surprised really, but still thought he needed to be called on it.

Curious to see if/how he replies.

[tbone2u]

You are figuring him out Old-T. Whatever he comes back with....he will "know" much more than you.
He can't help it. It's just the way he is.

[Seedy]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Not surprised really, but still thought he needed to be called on it.

Curious to see if/how he replies.

OT, your just now finding out what kind of toad fg is? We in Houston have to put up with this decreped old farts bs, all the time. He has only one friend, and he is a snake also. Glad you've seen the light, fg never will.