34 murders in Baltimore since Freddy Grays's Death

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Hugh's cunt is malignant? I guess that means he has rectal cancer from you raping him with your worm.

The fact that you don't know the difference between a rectum and a cunt, says it all. Is that the excuse you tell your wife for why you're constantly getting caught with strange men in the park after dark?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Can you believe it, and he keeps calling the Republicans/Conservatives stupid, at least conservatives speak some kind sense and/or sensibility, not all non-sensical expletives, due to lack of literacy.

You know WR, if one wishes for anyone to take one seriously, one must learn words that have more than 2 syllables and how to put those words into sentences properly and possibly even assembling a paragraph, otherwise that person is deemed to be uneducated at best. At worst, one could be considered sub-human with such gutter speak.

I'm not sure I've ever seen so many words used to say so little. If one wishes to be taken seriously, one must use language indicative of one's station in life. There, I've boiled your entire paragraph down into one sentence. It's obvious you are uneducated. Those who are educated rarely speak of it or reference it. I'm completely capable of speaking like an inflated douchebag, I simply choose not to. It's taxing, and unnecessary. I prefer to be judged by the content of what I say and not how I say it. As you have no content, your fixation on the form is understandable.

Now go fuck off

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

It's obvious you are uneducated. Those who are educated rarely speak of it or reference it.

I've heard the same said about money and big dicks.

Which one were you bragging about? And your GF dumped you?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I've heard the same said about money and big dicks.

Which one were you bragging about? And your GF dumped you?

I don't believe I've mentioned either of those things. And your continued fixation/obsession with a former gf of mine is quite troubling. And more than a little bit creepy. I've moved on, perhaps you should too.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't believe I've mentioned either of those things. And your continued fixation/obsession with a former gf of mine is quite troubling. And more than a little bit creepy. I've moved on, perhaps you should too.

Does she have a NWA policy?

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

It's Not Race That Divides Us, But Culture


May 23, 2015
By Jeffrey T. Brown

The racialists in power have again called us to an “honest discussion” about race. As they foresee it, this honest discussion will involve those of us who do not practice racism, but are not black, to come forward, confess our inherent racism, and be duly chastised or punished. Dialogue is not going to be part of the process, since non-blacks have already been found guilty, and the president’s jury is not remotely interested in evidence.

The trap in the president’s faux invitation is that it focuses our attention on the wrong component. The emphasis on race assumes too much, but does so because it advances the agenda of dividing us on grand scales, which is more conducive to the illusion of victimhood and the cure of entitlement. To divide by race in the way practiced by the president and the left enables them to hide one set of social realities from scrutiny, while predetermining the fault of another social set, based entirely on the colors of their skin, as long as it is understood that the guilty are not black. How is it possible that two or more groups, coincidentally divided by skin color, live in the same country but do not live in the same reality?



To hear our black, democratically elected president tell it, our dystopian nation is a hellhole of virulent racism. Thus, every thought, word or action that is critical of the president, and those who peddle racial victimhood and entitlement, is inherently racist. This is the rationale of a leftist, of a simpleton, because there is far too much history and evidence to the contrary to entertain it as serious. No nation on Earth more consciously ensures equality of treatment than ours.

So, if it’s not race that divides us, what is it? In a word, culture. For decades, a segment of the population that is black has drawn much attention, and critical scrutiny, for the culture that has become synonymous for many with what it is to be black. Not just what whites or non-blacks think constitutes blackness, but what many blacks think it is to be black. However, this is not true of all blacks, which is a critical distinction. There are many blacks who do not subscribe to black culture as it has been manifested in innumerable ways over the prior few decades. Even so, the ones who do, and whose practice of black culture is so visible and overt, make it easy for the lazy to think it is a representation of blackness in general, when it is not.

The president, for example, has no interest in representing the black citizens who live in stable family units, who work hard, provide for their children, encourage success, obey the laws, go to church, and try to do what’s right. He never speaks to their reality. His people, and Eric Holder’s people, are the ones who both celebrate and are imprisoned by a dysfunctional form of black culture. Within that culture there is self-segregation, hostility to other races, paranoia, anger, resentment, bitterness, victimhood, entitlement, crime, poverty, disinformation, deception, exploitation, broken families, destruction of religious faith, and failure.

At the same time within this country there are other cultures, successful social structures that are not afflicted with the same inherent flaws and imminent failure. What’s more, those cultures are not exclusive, because cultures embody the values and expectations of its members. You can subscribe to whichever culture you choose. For that reason, there are black Americans who have nothing to do with black culture as seen in the speeches of community disorganizers and race hustlers, in movies and music, and in videos of rioting in the name of whatever falsehood the left invented before the facts and evidence were made public. Those black Americans have accepted that there is an opportunity to advance and succeed, and create a family history of success and achievement, if they do not accept the invitation to the black culture that is championed by the likes of the president, Mr. Holder, Mr. Sharpton, and countless others whose power comes from using black culture to advance themselves while benefitting its practitioners nothing.

The clash of cultures is what primarily accounts for the divides that exist in reality even though, coincidentally, most of the subscribers to one culture may be black, and most of the subscribers to a competing culture are white or non-black. Race is a tool to inflame passions, using the lie that differences are the product of white and non-black hatred of blacks. Therefore, in black culture outsiders are not welcome. In non-black culture, however, skin color is irrelevant. Membership is defined, without reference to skin color, by one’s individual dignity, willingness to strive, adherence to rules of ethics and conduct, responsibility and accomplishments. In truth, the lines between the competing cultures can be crossed, but only one way.

Indeed, the biggest lie told in black culture is that to “act white” is to sell out other blacks, a fraud whereby some blacks define themselves and each other by loyalty to the culture, rather than to the potential and possibilities of the individual. In this way, membership in the culture that self-oppresses is ensured through coercion and shame. To join the other culture is betrayal and disloyalty, rather than an act of exasperation, or optimism. There is a way out, but it will cost many who try dearly in friendships and family ties.

Those of us who do not oppress but merely live our lives with respect for the dignity of others, regardless of skin color, hear and see how black culture describes and defines us, and we cannot pretend to agree or accept their branding. We see the despair, the anger and hatred, the violence of the mob that is literally a single event away from boiling over, and we shake our heads because the wounds are largely self-inflicted. Their choices, be they in culture, leadership, propaganda, beliefs, morals or otherwise, were not made for them by us. They are not forced to remain in their perceived distress, but have chosen by their leaders and ideology to remain there, stuck until a future Moses leads them out of a self-imposed darkness that is unnecessary.

If this were not true, and if ours was a racist nation, the countless foreign nationals who come legally to the United States from Africa, the Middle East, and Asia would all fail miserably, falling victims to the entrenched racism that simply doesn’t exist. A major reason those people succeed, seizing upon the opportunities that are there for the taking, is that they are not indoctrinated by a culture that lies to them about what their future is, or could be, in our amazing country. They succeed because no one is preventing them from doing so.

If we were ever to have that honest conversation about race, it would need to start with culture, and how that form of black culture which imprisons its subscribers condemns them to failure. The last thing the president wants is that conversation. If all those people freed themselves from the yoke of that culture, they might turn on the Democrats forever. Imagine that.

The racialists in power have again called us to an “honest discussion” about race. As they foresee it, this honest discussion will involve those of us who do not practice racism, but are not black, to come forward, confess our inherent racism, and be duly chastised or punished. Dialogue is not going to be part of the process, since non-blacks have already been found guilty, and the president’s jury is not remotely interested in evidence.

The trap in the president’s faux invitation is that it focuses our attention on the wrong component. The emphasis on race assumes too much, but does so because it advances the agenda of dividing us on grand scales, which is more conducive to the illusion of victimhood and the cure of entitlement. To divide by race in the way practiced by the president and the left enables them to hide one set of social realities from scrutiny, while predetermining the fault of another social set, based entirely on the colors of their skin, as long as it is understood that the guilty are not black. How is it possible that two or more groups, coincidentally divided by skin color, live in the same country but do not live in the same reality?



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...#ixzz3ay48dQJa
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook







.

Excellent article.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't believe I've mentioned either of those things.

When someone lies it is difficult for them to remember their lies.

"My name doesn't have anything to do with baby killing you cum guzzler. It's the name of a porno. Large dicks get up in guts, hence womb raider. You wouldn't know anything about kidney shifting, pea shooter." Nancy Reagan Wants Hillary to Win. Post #24. 04/26/2015.

The only thing possibly "troubling" is reminding you of your obsession. Your "forum persona" is to attack others' delivery and ability in order to create an appearance that you have a superior intellect. You consistently preference any substantive remark with some homosexual comment or lame ass attempt at ridicule. Putting others down does not increase your qualities. It diminishes them.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't believe I've mentioned either of those things. And your continued fixation/obsession with a former gf of mine is quite troubling. And more than a little bit creepy. I've moved on, perhaps you should too.

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Does she have a NWA policy?

Originally Posted by LexusLover

When someone lies it is difficult for them to remember their lies.

"My name doesn't have anything to do with baby killing you cum guzzler. It's the name of a porno. Large dicks get up in guts, hence womb raider. You wouldn't know anything about kidney shifting, pea shooter." Nancy Reagan Wants Hillary to Win. Post #24. 04/26/2015.

The only thing possibly "troubling" is reminding you of your obsession. Your "forum persona" is to attack others' delivery and ability in order to create an appearance that you have a superior intellect. You consistently preference any substantive remark with some homosexual comment or lame ass attempt at ridicule. Putting others down does not increase your qualities. It diminishes them.

Crickets.

You also apparently "forgot" you brought up your "former" Black GF as "proof" that you are not a "racist." It's amazing how folks post on here about their personal lives then whine when it is later thrown in their face to demonstrate their inconsistencies ... You are no exception.

So ... every time you post using your current handle you are claiming..

... you have a "LARGE DICK"!!! (Do you also drive a "large" pickup?)

Just like the poster below .... "i'va biggen" ... Is he talking about his mouth?

[CaptCroakers]

I just spoke with an insider yesterday who told me drug busts in Bmore used to be in the 3 digits per month prior to the incident. That number has now plummeted to the low low 2 digits. Cops want nothing to do with it anymore.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by CaptCroakers

I just spoke with an insider yesterday who told me drug busts in Bmore used to be in the 3 digits per month prior to the incident. That number has now plummeted to the low low 2 digits. Cops want nothing to do with it anymore.

That is what I advocate. Aside from a very,very few, all of these shootings of young black men were the result of these men being engaged in some type of criminal activity. So, the simple solution is, stay the fuck out of these nieghborhoods. Let them have at it.

Let them steal from each other, sell their drugs, and lay around being boils on the butt of humanity. Let the Black elected officials handle it the best way they can, as long as it doesn't involve Police Officers being put in a position that could ruin their lives.

The current trend in "poverty pimp land" seems to be, "let the inmates run the asylum". Have at it.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

That is what I advocate.

The current trend in "poverty pimp land" seems to be, "let the inmates run the asylum". Have at it.

Don't fund it with Federal tax dollars then. Once the locals have to rely on the local tax base, property, income, and/or sales tax, the "powers to be" will start cleaning up the area and assuring that property values and income will increase.

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by CaptCroakers

...Cops want nothing to do with it anymore.

As Marion Barry used to say, "You can't fight city hall."

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Don't fund it with Federal tax dollars then. Once the locals have to rely on the local tax base, property, income, and/or sales tax, the "powers to be" will start cleaning up the area and assuring that property values and income will increase.

I believe you wrong in this scenario. You are under the "rational mind" syndrome. What would happen is Baltimore would turn into a quasi-war zone and governor would ask for more Federal money and interdiction.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

I believe you wrong in this scenario. You are under the "rational mind" syndrome. What would happen is Baltimore would turn into a quasi-war zone and governor would ask for more Federal money and interdiction.

Just establish a perimeter with checkpoints to assure no contraband is removed. Allow it to implode. With no subsidies or grants the Mayor "on down" will lack the incentive to remain in office. After the residents remaining burn all the shit down, there will be plenty of "shovel ready" projects for a well-experienced "community organizer" to work when he starts looking for a real job.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Just establish a perimeter with checkpoints to assure no contraband is removed. Allow it to implode. With no subsidies or grants the Mayor "on down" will lack the incentive to remain in office. After the residents remaining burn all the shit down, there will be plenty of "shovel ready" projects for a well-experienced "community organizer" to work when he starts looking for a real job.

I completely agree. The rational police officer at this point should engage in a sit down strike, which is essentially giving the critics the bird by giving them what they really want - no white men as police. Let's give it a try in those cities and see what happens over the next ten years, if they get no outside help.