Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Mr MojoRisin · 02-28-2014, 08:13 PM

What a stupid bitch. She quits a job that has a future for a good retirement and starts a business that has a questionable retirement future at best, just to have a cheap Healthcare Policy.

Jim

LexusLover · 03-01-2014, 03:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frenchybruno18

#1: Now about the death panels, seriously?

I remember obamacare was originally a republican idea drafted by the heritage foundation.

Aren’t you proud to be a republican now, thanks to you guys, we now have obamacare.

#1: You might want to read the ACA. OF COURSE, the ACA doesn't use the phrase "Death Panel" ... there is a regional board established to which denials of coverage by a carrier are appealed and that board decides whether one gets coverage or not. Those decisions are customarily "LIFE AND DEATH" decisions (just like in Medicare/Medicaid decisions) because more serious (expensive) treatments are customarily the ones denied by carriers who do not want to spend the money.

#2: You are parroting the socialistic, monarchy talking points again ... did you read the article published in the Heritage Foundation rag ... or just quote bullshit from other bullshitters? The "problem" with the proposal in the Foundation article .. it applies to ALL citizens and ALL employers ... across the board .. EVERYONE is on the same page. FAR DIFFERENT from the reality of ACA, plus the article suggests methodology for PAYING FOR THE SUPPLEMENTS WITH TAXING ADJUSTMENTS has built into ... APPLICABLE TO EVERYONE. No exemptions, no delays. On paper. I would not have gotten through Congress ... any more than HILLARY-CARE.

#3: I don't think you will find a lot of "Republican" pronouncements in support ...

Moynihan's suggesting of "privatizing" social security with private accounts fits into that "mold" ... the socialists like you didn't clamor for it and leap at the opportunity.

And I didn't read anything about Executive Exemptions and tax penalties for not signing up.

There were suggestions which were apparently ignored ... substantial changes in the taxing and deducting of medial costs ... which amounted to a substantial tax increase.

You might want to "revisit" HILLARY-CARE ... or just give it a year .. it will be in the news.

WTF · 03-01-2014, 06:10 AM

LL does not seem to mind the fact that I paid for his kids public education. If he has any...

LexusLover · 03-01-2014, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

LL does not seem to mind the fact that I paid for his kids public education. If he has any...

You didn't. So, I don't need to "mind" anything. So, not only are you demonstrating one post at a time that you just make this shit up you post, but you are also proving you are a liar.

That is called a "two-fer"!

WTF · 03-01-2014, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You didn't. So, I don't need to "mind" anything. So, not only are you demonstrating one post at a time that you just make this shit up you post, but you are also proving you are a liar.

That is called a "two-fer"!

Should only people that have kids pay for their schooling? That is the question LL. Is it to hard for you to answer?

flghtr65 · 03-02-2014, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Astounding that the left thinks we should pay a subsidy so this individual can have the luxury to quit a job and start up a company......

The story in the link did not say that she received a subsidy. She can only qualify for a subsidy if she is single and makes less than $48,000 per year. A lot school teachers make more than that. The health insurance that she plans to purchase on the exchange will be portable. She plans to start her business with her own savings.

"Obamacare will allow me to be more comfortable at risking what I own."

LexusLover · 03-04-2014, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Should only people that have kids pay for their schooling? That is the question LL. Is it to hard for you to answer?

Your question really doesn't matter. Now does it? You didn't pay for my any of the education in my family .. extended or otherwise. For you it's a non-issue.

Is that concept too difficult for you to comprehend?

LexusLover · 03-04-2014, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flghtr65

The story in the link did not say that she received a subsidy. She can only qualify for a subsidy if she is single and makes less than $48,000 per year. A lot school teachers make more than that. The health insurance that she plans to purchase on the exchange will be portable. She plans to start her business with her own savings.

"Obamacare will allow me to be more comfortable at risking what I own."

#1: She quit teaching so she is not making "more than that"!!!
#2: She will have to "make" $48,000 or more a year in her business.
#3: She will not do #2.

So she qualifies for a subsidy .. that's why her premiums are so low.

Now back to the bullshit story, which according to Harry Reid is a LIE!

WTF · 03-04-2014, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Your question really doesn't matter. Now does it? You didn't pay for my any of the education in my family .. extended or otherwise. For you it's a non-issue.

Is that concept too difficult for you to comprehend?

Is the concept that people that do not have children pay school taxes for folks that do have children to hard for you to understand? Does your hypocritical ass think that only folks that have school age children pay school taxes? Should people that do not have kids be forced to subsidies folks that do? Do you understand this fact?

LexusLover · 03-04-2014, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Do you understand this fact?

What "fact"?

Be careful standing on your soap box too long.....it's getting old.

Like I have said to you before .... talk your talk to your Bimbos. Not me.

They (your Bimbos) have really got you dumbed-down keeping up with them.

WTF · 03-04-2014, 01:19 PM

The fact that folks that do not have kids....pay school taxes. Keep trying to change the subject like a bimbo.

LexusLover · 03-04-2014, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

The fact that folks that do not have kids....pay school taxes. Keep trying to change the subject like a bimbo.

I thought you were an expert on bimbos ... but ...

where did I say that folks without kids don't pay school taxes ...

or ...

is this one of those fake conversations you stir up to appear correct again?

That may work with your gaggle of bimbos, but not in the real world.

WTF · 03-04-2014, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

where did I say that folks without kids don't pay school taxes ...

.

Is that not a subsidy for one group of folks? Do you have a problem with that subsidy? Damn bimbos don't act as dumb as you are acting....or are you not acting?

LexusLover · 03-04-2014, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Is that not a subsidy for one group of folks?

No. It's not a "subsidy." But you are ok with "subsidizing" the teacher?

WTF · 03-04-2014, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

No. It's not a "subsidy." But you are ok with "subsidizing" the teacher?

What is it then? What is it when I pay for another parents kids education?