This so called President is nothing but a terrorist at best

[UnderConstruction]

Originally Posted by rioseco

And you would not get it because you are full of the same shit as all liberals.

That's all you got? Out of all that, that's the one thing you can say? Tell me why someone killing in the name of Islam is somehow worse than someone killing in the name of christianity? Just explain that to me. We can argue about the crusades and who attacked who first until we're blue in the face, but the crux of the matter is that both sides thought god was on their side and condoned their killing of another human being. That's fucked up. That's what religion reduces you to. Murdering another human being because they don't believe in the same fairytale as you. Just think about that for a minute and how fucking stupid that is.

[IIFFOFRDB]

[IIFFOFRDB]

[UnderConstruction]

Those cartoons are so informative... I almost changed my mind... almost.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by rioseco

Yeah, blah,blah blah......up yours too shit stain !

Truth hurts piss ant. Keep on hating.

[i'va biggen]

Whiffy is the biggest waste of bandwidth on the board.

[UnderConstruction]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Whiffy is the biggest waste of bandwidth on the board.

I don't know. I@##@%# is a close second, with all the fooking cartoons. He and LL should hook up.

[Cherie]

who have chosen to attack on appearance, ageism, sexism as a way to put me down as opposed to "intelligently" responding to my post, which was certainly on the provocative side, you have done nothing but shown how little, you either know on the subject, (that being polltics or markedly, international politics) or it makes you feel "superior" (there is only one reason we belittle another human, and that is to try and make ourselves feel better and part of a group, as we humans are tribal by nature) to be a misogynist, because, hey whats a woman doing in our playground (the Political Board), this is a "man's club". Yes I do recognize the fact, women’s speech is granted less authority, and that gentlemen, is sad, because you are the ones missing out on another point of view.

[UnderConstruction]

Originally Posted by Cherie

who have chosen to attack on appearance, ageism, sexism as a way to put me down as opposed to "intelligently" responding to my post, which was certainly on the provocative side, you have done nothing but shown how little, you either know on the subject, (that being polltics or markedly, international politics) or it makes you feel "superior" (there is only one reason we belittle another human, and that is to try and make ourselves feel better and part of a group, as we humans are tribal by nature) to be a misogynist, because, hey whats a woman doing in our playground (the Political Board), this is a "man's club". Yes I do recognize the fact, women’s speech is granted less authority, and that gentlemen, is sad, because you are the ones missing out on another point of view.

I completely agree with your sentiment in this post. You are a good-looking woman, that's beside the point. My problem is with the provocative nature of the post. We can debate policy but to begin the debate with the statement that the president is a terrorist isn't going to help move things along. I'm constantly championing a woman's right to control her body as well as those in the LGBT community and I'm called faggot and all manner of things. I don't give a shit. It's just wrong and most here have no interest in debate of any kind. It's more of a gotcha game. I welcome your point of view but it's hard to find common ground when you start out lobbing that kind of grenade into the room.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Being president of the USA requires you to deal with people that are not friends to us. Sometime negations are in order for the good of the country. In the past other presidents have had to deal with some countries that were not friendly to us. However it will not compute with you.

Originally Posted by Cherie

who have chosen to attack on appearance, ageism, sexism as a way to put me down as opposed to "intelligently" responding to my post, which was certainly on the provocative side, you have done nothing but shown how little, you either know on the subject, (that being polltics or markedly, international politics) or it makes you feel "superior" (there is only one reason we belittle another human, and that is to try and make ourselves feel better and part of a group, as we humans are tribal by nature) to be a misogynist, because, hey whats a woman doing in our playground (the Political Board), this is a "man's club". Yes I do recognize the fact, women’s speech is granted less authority, and that gentlemen, is sad, because you are the ones missing out on another point of view.

In case you missed it.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

I completely agree with your sentiment in this post. You are a good-looking woman, that's beside the point. My problem is with the provocative nature of the post. We can debate policy but to begin the debate with the statement that the president is a terrorist isn't going to help move things along. I'm constantly championing a woman's right to control her body as well as those in the LGBT community and I'm called faggot and all manner of things. I don't give a shit. It's just wrong and most here have no interest in debate of any kind. It's more of a gotcha game. I welcome your point of view but it's hard to find common ground when you start out lobbing that kind of grenade into the room.

And with that post, Sir, I'm sure even without common ground, we could have respect and an intelligent discussion/debate. Thank you, you can now call me Agent Provocateur

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

In case you missed it.

But, you see, I see it in a different light. The PRESIDENT of The United States of America is not in the business of negation (which BTW he has done very well, the negation of the Executive Office and of our Military has been reprehensible). And "deals"? Well, that just kinda conjures up the imagine of The Mob making a deal in a smokey back room. But now "negotiate" (which I'm not sure if that word is in Obama's vocabulary) thats a Regal word, and that is how the President of the USA should act for and about this great country, like a true "leader" would do, and a "true leader", could and would bring those "enemies to the "negotiating table" and work the deal.

[IIFFOFRDB]

[DSK]

Originally Posted by shanm

True.
Unfortunately I have a little cherokee in me from my grandma's side. That would probably disqualify me under her "NBA" policy. Racist bitch.

That's ridiculous. Partial Cherokee doesn't qualify you to whine about being barred by a 'no blacks allowed" policy!

[CuteOldGuy]

I'd like to hear from the families of the innocent men, women and children who have been killed and injured by US drone strikes on who they think terrorists are. When they blow up innocent people it's "terrorism". When we do it it's "national security". Bullshit. Terrorism is terrorism.

A "true" American does not justify or condone the wrongdoings of his/her government.